From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751210AbcEIFhg (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 01:37:36 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:35107 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750964AbcEIFhe (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 01:37:34 -0400 Message-ID: <1462772246.5344.4.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] clk: mediatek: Add config options for MT2701 subsystem clocks From: James Liao To: Stephen Boyd CC: Matthias Brugger , Mike Turquette , Rob Herring , John Crispin , Arnd Bergmann , Sascha Hauer , Daniel Kurtz , Philipp Zabel , , , , , , Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 13:37:26 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20160506230214.GH3492@codeaurora.org> References: <1460621514-65191-1-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> <1460621514-65191-9-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> <20160506230214.GH3492@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org HI Stephen, On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 16:02 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/14, James Liao wrote: > > MT2701 subsystem clocks are optional and should be enabled only if > > their subsystem drivers are ready to control these clocks. > > > > Signed-off-by: James Liao > > --- > > Why is this patch split off from the patch that introduces the > file? I was looking for comments about how to make subsystem clocks optional. So I used a separated patch to do it. Is it an acceptable way to use config options to enable subsystem clock support? Best regards, James From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Liao Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] clk: mediatek: Add config options for MT2701 subsystem clocks Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 13:37:26 +0800 Message-ID: <1462772246.5344.4.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1460621514-65191-1-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> <1460621514-65191-9-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> <20160506230214.GH3492@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160506230214.GH3492-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Matthias Brugger , Mike Turquette , Rob Herring , John Crispin , Arnd Bergmann , Sascha Hauer , Daniel Kurtz , Philipp Zabel , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org HI Stephen, On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 16:02 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/14, James Liao wrote: > > MT2701 subsystem clocks are optional and should be enabled only if > > their subsystem drivers are ready to control these clocks. > > > > Signed-off-by: James Liao > > --- > > Why is this patch split off from the patch that introduces the > file? I was looking for comments about how to make subsystem clocks optional. So I used a separated patch to do it. Is it an acceptable way to use config options to enable subsystem clock support? Best regards, James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com (James Liao) Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 13:37:26 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v7 8/9] clk: mediatek: Add config options for MT2701 subsystem clocks In-Reply-To: <20160506230214.GH3492@codeaurora.org> References: <1460621514-65191-1-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> <1460621514-65191-9-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> <20160506230214.GH3492@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <1462772246.5344.4.camel@mtksdaap41> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org HI Stephen, On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 16:02 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/14, James Liao wrote: > > MT2701 subsystem clocks are optional and should be enabled only if > > their subsystem drivers are ready to control these clocks. > > > > Signed-off-by: James Liao > > --- > > Why is this patch split off from the patch that introduces the > file? I was looking for comments about how to make subsystem clocks optional. So I used a separated patch to do it. Is it an acceptable way to use config options to enable subsystem clock support? Best regards, James