All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: rename process_smi to enter_smm, process_smi_request to process_smi
Date: Wed,  1 Jun 2016 22:26:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464812761-28709-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464812761-28709-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Make the function names more similar between KVM_REQ_NMI and KVM_REQ_SMI.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 13e73a8badda..9b5a25fb7fa1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static u64 __read_mostly efer_reserved_bits = ~((u64)EFER_SCE);
 
 static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 static void process_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+static void enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 static void __kvm_set_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags);
 
 struct kvm_x86_ops *kvm_x86_ops __read_mostly;
@@ -6105,7 +6105,7 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool req_int_win)
 	/* try to inject new event if pending */
 	if (vcpu->arch.smi_pending && !is_smm(vcpu)) {
 		vcpu->arch.smi_pending = false;
-		process_smi(vcpu);
+		enter_smm(vcpu);
 	} else if (vcpu->arch.nmi_pending && kvm_x86_ops->nmi_allowed(vcpu)) {
 		--vcpu->arch.nmi_pending;
 		vcpu->arch.nmi_injected = true;
@@ -6129,6 +6129,7 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool req_int_win)
 			kvm_x86_ops->set_irq(vcpu);
 		}
 	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -6152,7 +6153,7 @@ static void process_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 #define put_smstate(type, buf, offset, val)			  \
 	*(type *)((buf) + (offset) - 0x7e00) = val
 
-static u32 process_smi_get_segment_flags(struct kvm_segment *seg)
+static u32 enter_smm_get_segment_flags(struct kvm_segment *seg)
 {
 	u32 flags = 0;
 	flags |= seg->g       << 23;
@@ -6166,7 +6167,7 @@ static u32 process_smi_get_segment_flags(struct kvm_segment *seg)
 	return flags;
 }
 
-static void process_smi_save_seg_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
+static void enter_smm_save_seg_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
 {
 	struct kvm_segment seg;
 	int offset;
@@ -6181,11 +6182,11 @@ static void process_smi_save_seg_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
 
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, offset + 8, seg.base);
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, offset + 4, seg.limit);
-	put_smstate(u32, buf, offset, process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg));
+	put_smstate(u32, buf, offset, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg));
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-static void process_smi_save_seg_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
+static void enter_smm_save_seg_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
 {
 	struct kvm_segment seg;
 	int offset;
@@ -6194,7 +6195,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_seg_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
 	kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, n);
 	offset = 0x7e00 + n * 16;
 
-	flags = process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8;
+	flags = enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8;
 	put_smstate(u16, buf, offset, seg.selector);
 	put_smstate(u16, buf, offset + 2, flags);
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, offset + 4, seg.limit);
@@ -6202,7 +6203,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_seg_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
 }
 #endif
 
-static void process_smi_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
+static void enter_smm_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
 {
 	struct desc_ptr dt;
 	struct kvm_segment seg;
@@ -6226,13 +6227,13 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7fc4, seg.selector);
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f64, seg.base);
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f60, seg.limit);
-	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f5c, process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg));
+	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f5c, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg));
 
 	kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, VCPU_SREG_LDTR);
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7fc0, seg.selector);
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f80, seg.base);
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f7c, seg.limit);
-	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f78, process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg));
+	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f78, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg));
 
 	kvm_x86_ops->get_gdt(vcpu, &dt);
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f74, dt.address);
@@ -6243,7 +6244,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f54, dt.size);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
-		process_smi_save_seg_32(vcpu, buf, i);
+		enter_smm_save_seg_32(vcpu, buf, i);
 
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f14, kvm_read_cr4(vcpu));
 
@@ -6252,7 +6253,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7ef8, vcpu->arch.smbase);
 }
 
-static void process_smi_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
+static void enter_smm_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	struct desc_ptr dt;
@@ -6284,7 +6285,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
 
 	kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, VCPU_SREG_TR);
 	put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e90, seg.selector);
-	put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e92, process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8);
+	put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e92, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8);
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7e94, seg.limit);
 	put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7e98, seg.base);
 
@@ -6294,7 +6295,7 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
 
 	kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, VCPU_SREG_LDTR);
 	put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e70, seg.selector);
-	put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e72, process_smi_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8);
+	put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e72, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8);
 	put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7e74, seg.limit);
 	put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7e78, seg.base);
 
@@ -6303,13 +6304,13 @@ static void process_smi_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
 	put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7e68, dt.address);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
-		process_smi_save_seg_64(vcpu, buf, i);
+		enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, buf, i);
 #else
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 #endif
 }
 
-static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_segment cs, ds;
 	struct desc_ptr dt;
@@ -6320,9 +6321,9 @@ static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->arch.hflags |= HF_SMM_MASK;
 	memset(buf, 0, 512);
 	if (guest_cpuid_has_longmode(vcpu))
-		process_smi_save_state_64(vcpu, buf);
+		enter_smm_save_state_64(vcpu, buf);
 	else
-		process_smi_save_state_32(vcpu, buf);
+		enter_smm_save_state_32(vcpu, buf);
 
 	kvm_vcpu_write_guest(vcpu, vcpu->arch.smbase + 0xfe00, buf, sizeof(buf));
 
@@ -6378,7 +6379,7 @@ static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	kvm_mmu_reset_context(vcpu);
 }
 
-static void process_smi_request(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	vcpu->arch.smi_pending = true;
 	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
@@ -6505,7 +6506,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_STEAL_UPDATE, vcpu))
 			record_steal_time(vcpu);
 		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SMI, vcpu))
-			process_smi_request(vcpu);
+			process_smi(vcpu);
 		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_NMI, vcpu))
 			process_nmi(vcpu);
 		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_PMU, vcpu))
-- 
2.5.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-01 20:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-01 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-01 20:26 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-06-02 14:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Radim Krčmář

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1464812761-28709-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.