From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:07:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465920434.30123.87.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160614155835.GA29820@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or
> > > > twice
> > > > in some
> > > > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't
> > > > like to
> > > > use PMC
> > > > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other
> > > > variation of
> > > > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.
> > > >
> > > > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power
> > > > Management
> > > > framework
> > > > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which
> > > > will
> > > > have its own
> > > > driver in the future, so, can't use it either.
> > > >
> > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit)
> > > > —
> > > > one of them?
> > >
> > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> >
> > Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.
>
> Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?
Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-13 20:18 [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 13:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 15:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 15:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 15:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 16:07 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2016-06-14 17:26 ` David Cohen
2016-06-14 17:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 17:38 ` David Cohen
2016-06-14 17:37 ` David Cohen
2016-06-14 17:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1465920434.30123.87.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.