From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c-i801: make it depend on CONFIG_X86 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:05:54 +0300 Message-ID: <1466190354.30123.163.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1465996923-76230-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20160616114915.0446f3a3@endymion> <1466155895.30123.153.camel@linux.intel.com> <20160617205936.74d3c6cd@endymion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:20990 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752021AbcFQTF6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:05:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160617205936.74d3c6cd@endymion> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 20:59 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:31:35 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 11:49 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > depends on X86 || IA64 || COMPILE_TEST > > > > I don't like this. (...) > > May I ask why? >>From my point of view it's not scalable. If new arch comes you have to add it here. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy