From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1467406642.32358.39.camel@buserror.net> From: Scott Wood To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Russell King , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd Cc: Scott Wood , Yuantian Tang , Viresh Kumar , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Yang-Leo Li , Xiaofeng Ren Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 15:57:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1736057.IZk9ncTkZk@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1466058085-19353-1-git-send-email-oss@buserror.net> <3794032.AoZL3DhM7U@vostro.rjw.lan> <1467356146.32358.32.camel@buserror.net> <1736057.IZk9ncTkZk@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering possible parent clocks List-ID: On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 22:53 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, July 01, 2016 01:55:46 AM Scott Wood wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 15:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, June 30, 2016 05:46:42 AM Scott Wood wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 06/29/2016 10:02 PM, Yuantian Tang wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@rjwysocki.net] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:24 AM > > > > > > To: Yuantian Tang > > > > > > Cc: Scott Wood ; Russell King > > > > > g.uk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ; > > > > > > Michael Turquette ; Stephen Boyd > > > > > > ; Viresh Kumar ; > > > > > > linux- > > > > > > clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- > > > > > > dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo Li ; Xiaofeng > > > > > > Ren > > > > > > ; Scott Wood > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering > > > > > > possible > > > > > > parent clocks > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, June 30, 2016 01:47:09 AM Yuantian Tang wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@rjwysocki.net] > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:47 AM > > > > > > > > To: Yuantian Tang > > > > > > > > Cc: Scott Wood ; Russell King > > > > > > > > ; Michael Turquette > > > > > > > > ; Stephen Boyd > > > > > > > > ; > > > > > > > > Viresh Kumar ; linux- clk@vger.kernel > > > > > > > > .org > > > > > > > > ; > > > > > > > > linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > > > > > > > > Yang-Leo > > > > > > > > Li ; Xiaofeng Ren ; > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > Wood > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for > > > > > > > > discovering > > > > > > > > possible parent clocks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 05:50:26 AM Yuantian Tang wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch is acked by clock maintainer. If no comments from > > > > > > > > > anyone else, > > > > > > > > we will merge it in next week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a cpufreq commit depending on it.  Are you going to > > > > > > > > handle > > > > > > > > that one too? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That one has been acked by cpufreq maintainer. You can get this > > > > > > > from > > > > > > patch comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > I know that it has been ACKed. > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is whether or not you are going to apply it along the > > > > > > [1/2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, it will have to be deferred until the [1/2] is merged and > > > > > > then > > > > > > applied > > > > > > which may not be desirable. > > > > > > > > > > > I hope we can apply both at same time. Seems Scott has a few > > > > > concerns. > > > > > > > > > > What you think about this patch? Can you apply it? > > > > > If you have applied this patch, then I can push CPUfreq maintainer > > > > > to > > > > > apply another one which will be delayed. > > > > My only concern was getting an ack for this patch (1/2) -- did I miss > > > > it > > > > somewhere? > > > OK, so who's going to apply the series? > > Ideally it should go via the cpufreq tree. > OK, I'll apply both, then. > > Who exactly has ACKed the [1/2] from the clk side? That's the problem.  I'm not sure what ACK Yuantian is referring to.  The last I've heard from a clock maintainer was https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/18/816 des pite repeated attempts to get Russell King to respond as clock API maintainer. -Scott From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering possible parent clocks Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 15:57:22 -0500 Message-ID: <1467406642.32358.39.camel@buserror.net> References: <1466058085-19353-1-git-send-email-oss@buserror.net> <3794032.AoZL3DhM7U@vostro.rjw.lan> <1467356146.32358.32.camel@buserror.net> <1736057.IZk9ncTkZk@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from host.buserror.net ([209.198.135.123]:60399 "EHLO host.buserror.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752549AbcGAU5i (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2016 16:57:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1736057.IZk9ncTkZk@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Russell King , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd Cc: Scott Wood , Yuantian Tang , Viresh Kumar , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Yang-Leo Li , Xiaofeng Ren On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 22:53 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, July 01, 2016 01:55:46 AM Scott Wood wrote: > >=20 > > On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 15:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >=20 > > > On Thursday, June 30, 2016 05:46:42 AM Scott Wood wrote: > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > On 06/29/2016 10:02 PM, Yuantian Tang wrote: > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@rjwysocki.net] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:24 AM > > > > > > To: Yuantian Tang > > > > > > Cc: Scott Wood ; Russell King > > > > > g.uk > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > ; > > > > > > Michael Turquette ; Stephen Boyd > > > > > > ; Viresh Kumar ; > > > > > > linux- > > > > > > clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- > > > > > > dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo Li ; Xia= ofeng > > > > > > Ren > > > > > > ; Scott Wood > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for disc= overing > > > > > > possible > > > > > > parent clocks > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > On Thursday, June 30, 2016 01:47:09 AM Yuantian Tang wrote: > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@rjwysocki.net] > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:47 AM > > > > > > > > To: Yuantian Tang > > > > > > > > Cc: Scott Wood ; Russell King > > > > > > > > ; Michael Turquette > > > > > > > > ; Stephen Boyd > > > > > > > > ; > > > > > > > > Viresh Kumar ; linux- clk@vger= =2Ekernel > > > > > > > > .org > > > > > > > > ; > > > > > > > > linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- dev@lists.ozlabs.or= g; > > > > > > > > Yang-Leo > > > > > > > > Li ; Xiaofeng Ren ; > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > Wood > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for > > > > > > > > discovering > > > > > > > > possible parent clocks > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 05:50:26 AM Yuantian Tang w= rote: > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > This patch is acked by clock maintainer. If no commen= ts from > > > > > > > > > anyone else, > > > > > > > > we will merge it in next week. > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > There is a cpufreq commit depending on it.=C2=A0=C2=A0A= re you going to > > > > > > > > handle > > > > > > > > that one too? > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > That one has been acked by cpufreq maintainer. You can ge= t this > > > > > > > from > > > > > > patch comments. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I know that it has been ACKed. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > My question is whether or not you are going to apply it alo= ng the > > > > > > [1/2]. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > If not, it will have to be deferred until the [1/2] is merg= ed and > > > > > > then > > > > > > applied > > > > > > which may not be desirable. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > I hope we can apply both at same time. Seems Scott has a few > > > > > concerns. > > > > >=20 > > > > > What you think about this patch? Can you apply it? > > > > > If you have applied this patch, then I can push CPUfreq maint= ainer > > > > > to > > > > > apply another one which will be delayed. > > > > My only concern was getting an ack for this patch (1/2) -- did = I miss > > > > it > > > > somewhere? > > > OK, so who's going to apply the series? > > Ideally it should go via the cpufreq tree. > OK, I'll apply both, then. >=20 > Who exactly has ACKed the [1/2] from the clk side? That's the problem. =C2=A0I'm not sure what ACK Yuantian is referring t= o. =C2=A0The last I've heard from a clock maintainer was=C2=A0https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/= 9/18/816=C2=A0des pite repeated attempts to get Russell King to respond as clock API main= tainer. -Scott