From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933053AbcGENaF (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:30:05 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:34281 "EHLO metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932928AbcGENaA (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:30:00 -0400 Message-ID: <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver From: Philipp Zabel To: Gabriel Fernandez Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Maxime Coquelin , Russell King , patrice.chotard@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:29:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <577B61EA.5080703@st.com> References: <1467640052-6770-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467640052-6770-3-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467653810.2224.77.camel@pengutronix.de> <577B61EA.5080703@st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:96de:80ff:fec2:9969 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2016, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez: [...] > >> +static const struct reset_control_ops stm32_reset_ops = { > >> + .assert = stm32_reset_assert, > >> + .deassert = stm32_reset_deassert, > > Are the registers not readable, or did you choose not to > > implement .status on purpose? > We choose to not implement. Ok. Because of size issues or just because you don't need them in any of your drivers? regards Philipp From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Zabel Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:29:30 +0200 Message-ID: <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de> References: <1467640052-6770-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467640052-6770-3-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467653810.2224.77.camel@pengutronix.de> <577B61EA.5080703@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <577B61EA.5080703-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Gabriel Fernandez Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Maxime Coquelin , Russell King , patrice.chotard-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, alexandre.torgue-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2016, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez: [...] > >> +static const struct reset_control_ops stm32_reset_ops = { > >> + .assert = stm32_reset_assert, > >> + .deassert = stm32_reset_deassert, > > Are the registers not readable, or did you choose not to > > implement .status on purpose? > We choose to not implement. Ok. Because of size issues or just because you don't need them in any of your drivers? regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:29:30 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver In-Reply-To: <577B61EA.5080703@st.com> References: <1467640052-6770-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467640052-6770-3-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467653810.2224.77.camel@pengutronix.de> <577B61EA.5080703@st.com> Message-ID: <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2016, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez: [...] > >> +static const struct reset_control_ops stm32_reset_ops = { > >> + .assert = stm32_reset_assert, > >> + .deassert = stm32_reset_deassert, > > Are the registers not readable, or did you choose not to > > implement .status on purpose? > We choose to not implement. Ok. Because of size issues or just because you don't need them in any of your drivers? regards Philipp