From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754861AbcG0JtK (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 05:49:10 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:5039 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754587AbcG0Jsu (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 05:48:50 -0400 Message-ID: <1469529774.4678.34.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701 From: YT Shen To: CK Hu CC: , Philipp Zabel , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "Russell King" , David Airlie , "Matthias Brugger" , Mao Huang , "Bibby Hsieh" , , , , , , "Sascha Hauer" , , , In-Reply-To: <1468997599.11841.49.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1468577274-6178-1-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> <1468577274-6178-5-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> <1468997599.11841.49.camel@mtksdaap41> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:42:54 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi CK, On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 14:53 +0800, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, YT: > > Some comments inline. > > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 18:07 +0800, YT Shen wrote: > > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem. > > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701. > > > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c | 6 ++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c | 6 ++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 7 +++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > 6 files changed, 92 insertions(+) > > > > [snip...] > > > > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_ddp_comp_dt_ids[] = { > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-ovl", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-rdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-rdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA }, > > Is WDMA different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma' because use > 'mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma' is enough. Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible 'mt2701-disp-wdma' > > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-color", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_COLOR }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-color", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_COLOR }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-aal", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_AAL}, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-gamma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_GAMMA, }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ufoe", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_UFOE }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-dsi", .data = (void *)MTK_DSI }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dsi", .data = (void *)MTK_DSI }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-dpi", .data = (void *)MTK_DPI }, > > Is DPI different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-dpi' because use > 'mediatek,mt8173-dpi' is enough. Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible 'mt2701-dpi' > > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi", .data = (void *)MTK_DPI }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_MUTEX }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_MUTEX }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-pwm", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_PWM }, > > Is pwm different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-pwm' because use > 'mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm' is enough. Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible 'mt2701-disp-pwm' Regards, yt.shen > > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_PWM }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-od", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OD }, > > { } > > @@ -514,6 +543,8 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mtk_drm_pm_ops, mtk_drm_sys_suspend, > > mtk_drm_sys_resume); > > > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_drm_of_ids[] = { > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-mmsys", > > + .data = &mt2701_mmsys_driver_data}, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-mmsys", > > .data = &mt8173_mmsys_driver_data}, > > { } > > Regards, > CK > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YT Shen Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:42:54 +0800 Message-ID: <1469529774.4678.34.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1468577274-6178-1-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> <1468577274-6178-5-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> <1468997599.11841.49.camel@mtksdaap41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1468997599.11841.49.camel@mtksdaap41> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+glpam-linux-mediatek=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: CK Hu Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Russell King , Bibby Hsieh , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , David Airlie , thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, emil.l.velikov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, Mao Huang , srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Philipp Zabel , Kumar Gala , Matthias Brugger , yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, Sascha Hauer , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi CK, On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 14:53 +0800, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, YT: > > Some comments inline. > > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 18:07 +0800, YT Shen wrote: > > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem. > > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701. > > > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c | 6 ++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c | 6 ++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 7 +++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > 6 files changed, 92 insertions(+) > > > > [snip...] > > > > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_ddp_comp_dt_ids[] = { > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-ovl", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-rdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-rdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA }, > > Is WDMA different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma' because use > 'mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma' is enough. Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible 'mt2701-disp-wdma' > > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-color", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_COLOR }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-color", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_COLOR }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-aal", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_AAL}, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-gamma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_GAMMA, }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ufoe", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_UFOE }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-dsi", .data = (void *)MTK_DSI }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dsi", .data = (void *)MTK_DSI }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-dpi", .data = (void *)MTK_DPI }, > > Is DPI different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-dpi' because use > 'mediatek,mt8173-dpi' is enough. Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible 'mt2701-dpi' > > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi", .data = (void *)MTK_DPI }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_MUTEX }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_MUTEX }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-pwm", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_PWM }, > > Is pwm different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-pwm' because use > 'mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm' is enough. Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible 'mt2701-disp-pwm' Regards, yt.shen > > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_PWM }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-od", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OD }, > > { } > > @@ -514,6 +543,8 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mtk_drm_pm_ops, mtk_drm_sys_suspend, > > mtk_drm_sys_resume); > > > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_drm_of_ids[] = { > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-mmsys", > > + .data = &mt2701_mmsys_driver_data}, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-mmsys", > > .data = &mt8173_mmsys_driver_data}, > > { } > > Regards, > CK > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yt.shen@mediatek.com (YT Shen) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:42:54 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701 In-Reply-To: <1468997599.11841.49.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1468577274-6178-1-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> <1468577274-6178-5-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> <1468997599.11841.49.camel@mtksdaap41> Message-ID: <1469529774.4678.34.camel@mtksdaap41> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi CK, On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 14:53 +0800, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, YT: > > Some comments inline. > > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 18:07 +0800, YT Shen wrote: > > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem. > > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701. > > > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c | 6 ++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c | 6 ++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 7 +++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > 6 files changed, 92 insertions(+) > > > > [snip...] > > > > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_ddp_comp_dt_ids[] = { > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-ovl", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-rdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-rdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA }, > > Is WDMA different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma' because use > 'mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma' is enough. Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible 'mt2701-disp-wdma' > > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-color", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_COLOR }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-color", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_COLOR }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-aal", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_AAL}, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-gamma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_GAMMA, }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ufoe", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_UFOE }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-dsi", .data = (void *)MTK_DSI }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dsi", .data = (void *)MTK_DSI }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-dpi", .data = (void *)MTK_DPI }, > > Is DPI different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-dpi' because use > 'mediatek,mt8173-dpi' is enough. Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible 'mt2701-dpi' > > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi", .data = (void *)MTK_DPI }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_MUTEX }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_MUTEX }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-pwm", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_PWM }, > > Is pwm different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-pwm' because use > 'mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm' is enough. Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible 'mt2701-disp-pwm' Regards, yt.shen > > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_PWM }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-od", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OD }, > > { } > > @@ -514,6 +543,8 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mtk_drm_pm_ops, mtk_drm_sys_suspend, > > mtk_drm_sys_resume); > > > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_drm_of_ids[] = { > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-mmsys", > > + .data = &mt2701_mmsys_driver_data}, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-mmsys", > > .data = &mt8173_mmsys_driver_data}, > > { } > > Regards, > CK >