From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D112A7AA for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [66.63.167.143]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FDD217 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204EA8EE2F8 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IhyUQSmZACOZ for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.232.161.213] (unknown [129.33.253.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7F5D8EE1C6 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1469727119.2295.25.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: James Bottomley To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 13:31:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1469726963.2295.23.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <1469726963.2295.23.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] self nomination List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 13:29 -0400, James Bottomley wrote: > I have been known to be OK with the occasional storage or obscure non > -x86 architecture or even the occasional mm issues. > > I'm principally interested in > > * Storage issues (not that these ever come up at the kernel summit) > * In kernel container technologies (gcroups, namespaces and how we > apply the granular virtualizations) since this has been one of my > foci for five years now. > * Security, keys and the TPM. I'm mostly working on this above the > kernel for a more secure cloud environment, but this means I have a > lot of TSS and TPM knowledge and I'd love to share the pain ... I suppose I should add that running a top level tree, I have an interest in process issues. I'd be somewhat interested in a stable tree discussion but only really to make sure it doesn't increase my maintainer workload ... James