From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752183AbcHIH6e (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2016 03:58:34 -0400 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:37758 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751522AbcHIH6d (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2016 03:58:33 -0400 Message-ID: <1470729510.28531.13.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211/wlcore: Add ieee80211_hw variable to get_expected_throughput From: Johannes Berg To: "Altshul, Maxim" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Cc: "john.stultz@linaro.org" , Kalle Valo , Eliad Peller , "Machani, Yaniv" Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 09:58:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20160804124314.7636-1-maxim.altshul@ti.com> <20160804124314.7636-2-maxim.altshul@ti.com> <1470399762.2977.40.camel@sipsolutions.net> ,<1470399880.2977.41.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1470411261.2977.43.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1470636651.2597.10.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.2-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 10:42 +0000, Altshul, Maxim wrote: > Yes, exactly! Should I send the patch then so that we protect > get_expected_throughput? Yes please. > If so, then please have a look at my previous mesh patch (not yet > applied) "[PATCH v3] mac80211: mesh: Add support for HW RC > implementation". Looks ok, I just haven't applied it because net-next was closed until today :) > If you approve the mesh patch, then I will send two patches: > 1. Check for sta->uploaded in the drv wrapper (will change the drv > wrapper header to get sta_info) > 2. v4 for the mesh patch with respect to header change in patch 1. I don't think adding the check changes anything wrt. the mesh patch? johannes