All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	acme@kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, treeze.taeung@gmail.com,
	naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, markus@trippelsdorf.de,
	chris.ryder@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, jolsa@kernel.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/7] perf annotate: Add support for powerpc
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:59:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471584546-11080-4-git-send-email-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471584546-11080-1-git-send-email-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Current perf can disassemble annotated function but it does not have
parsing logic for powerpc instructions. So all navigation options are
not available for powerpc.

Apart from that, Powerpc has long list of branch instructions and
hardcoding them in table appears to be error-prone. So, add function
to find instruction instead of creating table. This function dynamically
create table (list of 'struct ins'), and instead of creating object
every time, first check if list already contain object for that
instruction.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changes in v5:
  - Removed hacks for instructions like bctr and bctrl from this patch.

 tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index deb9af0..0b64841 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -459,6 +459,11 @@ static struct ins instructions_arm[] = {
 	{ .name = "bne",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
 };
 
+struct instructions_powerpc {
+	struct ins *ins;
+	struct list_head list;
+};
+
 static int ins__key_cmp(const void *name, const void *insp)
 {
 	const struct ins *ins = insp;
@@ -474,6 +479,115 @@ static int ins__cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
 	return strcmp(ia->name, ib->name);
 }
 
+static struct ins *list_add__ins_powerpc(struct instructions_powerpc *head,
+					 const char *name, struct ins_ops *ops)
+{
+	struct instructions_powerpc *ins_powerpc;
+	struct ins *ins;
+
+	ins = zalloc(sizeof(struct ins));
+	if (!ins)
+		return NULL;
+
+	ins_powerpc = zalloc(sizeof(struct instructions_powerpc));
+	if (!ins_powerpc)
+		goto out_free_ins;
+
+	ins->name = strdup(name);
+	if (!ins->name)
+		goto out_free_ins_power;
+
+	ins->ops = ops;
+	ins_powerpc->ins = ins;
+	list_add_tail(&(ins_powerpc->list), &(head->list));
+
+	return ins;
+
+out_free_ins_power:
+	zfree(&ins_powerpc);
+out_free_ins:
+	zfree(&ins);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct ins *list_search__ins_powerpc(struct instructions_powerpc *head,
+					    const char *name)
+{
+	struct instructions_powerpc *pos;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(pos, &head->list, list) {
+		if (!strcmp(pos->ins->name, name))
+			return pos->ins;
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct ins *ins__find_powerpc(const char *name)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct ins *ins;
+	struct ins_ops *ops;
+	static struct instructions_powerpc head;
+	static bool list_initialized;
+
+	/*
+	 * - Interested only if instruction starts with 'b'.
+	 * - Few start with 'b', but aren't branch instructions.
+	 */
+	if (name[0] != 'b'             ||
+	    !strncmp(name, "bcd", 3)   ||
+	    !strncmp(name, "brinc", 5) ||
+	    !strncmp(name, "bper", 4))
+		return NULL;
+
+	if (!list_initialized) {
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&head.list);
+		list_initialized = true;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Return if we already have object of 'struct ins' for this instruction
+	 */
+	ins = list_search__ins_powerpc(&head, name);
+	if (ins)
+		return ins;
+
+	ops = &jump_ops;
+
+	i = strlen(name) - 1;
+	if (i < 0)
+		return NULL;
+
+	/* ignore optional hints at the end of the instructions */
+	if (name[i] == '+' || name[i] == '-')
+		i--;
+
+	if (name[i] == 'l' || (name[i] == 'a' && name[i-1] == 'l')) {
+		/*
+		 * if the instruction ends up with 'l' or 'la', then
+		 * those are considered 'calls' since they update LR.
+		 * ... except for 'bnl' which is branch if not less than
+		 * and the absolute form of the same.
+		 */
+		if (strcmp(name, "bnl") && strcmp(name, "bnl+") &&
+		    strcmp(name, "bnl-") && strcmp(name, "bnla") &&
+		    strcmp(name, "bnla+") && strcmp(name, "bnla-"))
+			ops = &call_ops;
+	}
+	if (name[i] == 'r' && name[i-1] == 'l')
+		/*
+		 * instructions ending with 'lr' are considered to be
+		 * return instructions
+		 */
+		ops = &ret_ops;
+
+	/*
+	 * Add instruction to list so next time no need to
+	 * allocate memory for it.
+	 */
+	return list_add__ins_powerpc(&head, name, ops);
+}
+
 static void ins__sort(struct ins *instructions, int nmemb)
 {
 	qsort(instructions, nmemb, sizeof(struct ins), ins__cmp);
@@ -509,6 +623,8 @@ static struct ins *ins__find(const char *name, const char *norm_arch)
 	} else if (!strcmp(norm_arch, NORM_ARM)) {
 		instructions = instructions_arm;
 		nmemb = ARRAY_SIZE(instructions_arm);
+	} else if (!strcmp(norm_arch, NORM_POWERPC)) {
+		return ins__find_powerpc(name);
 	} else {
 		pr_err("perf annotate not supported by %s arch\n", norm_arch);
 		return NULL;
-- 
2.5.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-19  5:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-19  5:28 [PATCH v5 0/7] perf: Cross arch annotate + few miscellaneous fixes Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] perf: Define macro for normalized arch names Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] perf annotate: Add cross arch annotate support Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19  7:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-19 10:39     ` Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19 10:48       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-19 11:33         ` Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19  5:29 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2016-08-19  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] perf annotate: Do not ignore call instruction with indirect target Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] perf annotate: Show raw form for jump " Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] perf annotate: Support jump instruction with target as second operand Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] perf annotate: Fix jump target outside of function address range Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1471584546-11080-4-git-send-email-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris.ryder@arm.com \
    --cc=hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=treeze.taeung@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.