From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36004)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1bcjWD-0006ww-9N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:31:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1bcjWA-00074I-RJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:31:44 -0400
Message-ID: <1472088691.2246.62.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:31:31 +1000
In-Reply-To: <4a78a3a5-91ba-b3bd-a59c-d1ebf9f1470b@reactos.org>
References: <4a78a3a5-91ba-b3bd-a59c-d1ebf9f1470b@reactos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ppc: regression in 2.7.0-rc3 on rfi/rfid/hrfi
 instructions
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9?= Poussineau <hpoussin@reactos.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>

On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 20:39 +0200, Herv=C3=A9 Poussineau wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Following patch regresses Linux boot on PReP machine:
>=20
> commit a2e71b28e832346409efc795ecd1f0a2bcb705a3
> Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Date:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Tue Jun 21 23:48:46 2016 +0200
>=20
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation
>=20
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0This reworks emulation of the various "rf=
i" variants. I removed
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0some masking bits that I couldn't make se=
nse of, the only bit
> that

Interesting, the problem is only with 603, not 604. I think I might
have broken something with the 603 SW TLB loading stuff which is
a bit weird, I'll have a look. Thanks.

Cheers,
Ben.