From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] firmware_class: encapsulate firmware loading status
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:52:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472118723-22762-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> (raw)
From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
This version should address all comments from Luis. In the last patch
the fw_lock dependency is dropped. This only works if we garantee not
to race between the reader and the writer side in combination in going
to sleep and waking up. So here that should now be a good argument for
swait :)
cheers,
daniel
changes since v2:
- more splitting out
- first patch factors out all the bit ops into fw_status
- second patch gets rid of the bit ops
- third get rid of fw_lock by using swait
changes since v1:
- moved swait change into its own patch
- added ifdef section for FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
- updated commit message highlighting the mutex usage drop a bit
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/4/239
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Daniel Wagner (3):
firmware_class: encapsulate firmware loading status
firmware_class: Drop bit ops in favor of simple state machine
firmware_class: Do not use fw_lock for fw_status protection
drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 153 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-25 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-25 9:52 Daniel Wagner [this message]
2016-08-25 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] firmware_class: encapsulate firmware loading status Daniel Wagner
2016-08-25 17:50 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-08-29 9:50 ` Daniel Wagner
2016-08-29 14:18 ` Daniel Wagner
2016-08-30 19:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-08-31 7:13 ` Daniel Wagner
2016-09-07 0:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-08-25 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] firmware_class: Drop bit ops in favor of simple state machine Daniel Wagner
2016-08-25 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware_class: Do not use fw_lock for fw_status protection Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1472118723-22762-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org \
--to=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.