From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: guido@trentalancia.net (Guido Trentalancia)
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:42:06 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] gpg: public key signature verification in
 evolution
In-Reply-To: <09e0ed56-7f4d-71e8-d970-acecc18e2376@gmail.com>
References: <1472737946.17989.0.camel@trentalancia.net>
	<7958812d-93fe-ded7-fb23-6d02c150bcb3@ieee.org>
	<bc32fd38-c6d6-aa2e-bd61-44c9a99fb344@gmail.com>
	<1472815602.23008.8.camel@trentalancia.net>
	<09e0ed56-7f4d-71e8-d970-acecc18e2376@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1472827326.21408.7.camel@trentalancia.net>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Fri, 02/09/2016 at 15.48 +0200, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 01:26 PM, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> > 
> > Hello Dominick.
> > 
> > On Fri, 02/09/2016 at 10.48 +0200, Dominick Grift via refpolicy
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 09/02/2016 01:26 AM, Chris PeBenito via refpolicy wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On 09/01/16 09:52, Guido Trentalancia via refpolicy wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Let gpg verify public key signatures in the evolution mail
> > > > > client
> > > > > application.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Guido Trentalancia <guido@trentalancia.net>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > ?policy/modules/contrib/evolution.if |???21
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > ?policy/modules/contrib/gpg.te???????|????4 ++++
> > > > > ?2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- refpolicy-git-06082016-
> > > > > orig/policy/modules/contrib/evolution.if	2016-08-06
> > > > > 21:27:11.349094280 +0200
> > > > > +++ refpolicy-git-
> > > > > 06082016/policy/modules/contrib/evolution.if	
> > > > > 2016-09-01 15:33:27.072148930 +0200
> > > > > @@ -128,6 +128,27 @@ interface(`evolution_stream_connect',`
> > > > > 
> > > > > ?########################################
> > > > > ?## <summary>
> > > > > +##	Read evolution orbit temporary
> > > > > +##	files.
> > > > > +## </summary>
> > > > > +## <param name="domain">
> > > > > +##	<summary>
> > > > > +##	Domain allowed access.
> > > > > +##	</summary>
> > > > > +## </param>
> > > > > +#
> > > > > +interface(`evolution_read_orbit_tmp_t',`
> > > > 
> > > > evolution_read_orbit_tmp_files()
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > You dont have to mention "orbit" at all. There are only sockets
> > > in
> > > orbit, and push comes to show that's just a evolution socket.
> > > This
> > > file
> > > is outside of orbit and so it have nothing to do with orbit
> > > 
> > > so i would just use evolution_read_tmp_files()

There are different types of evolution temporary files, so it is
necessary to distinguish amongst them.

> > > however eventually it probably need rw instead of r, For example
> > > when
> > > you sign emails.
> > 
> > Let's try to sign this message and see if it also requires write
> > permissions...

It doesn't require write permissions, as it is evident in the new
version of the patch.

> is that PGP/MIME or in-line signing? I dont use evolution so not sure
> if
> it even support in-line signatures or PGP/MIME

It's PGP signing. SMIME signing does not use gpg.

> Either way, would be easy enough to adjust if and when someone needs
> it

It works as it is, without write permissions on that temporary file.
There is nothing to adjust.

> I still don't like the reference to orbit though

See above (different types of temporary files).

Originally I typed a wrong name by mistake (you know, copy and paste
the type name).

I have now amended the name, as kindly suggested by Christopher. See
version 2.

Regards,

Guido