From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-f177.google.com ([209.85.216.177]:34848 "EHLO mail-qt0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751468AbcIHVmn (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:42:43 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 93so31286635qtg.2 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 14:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1473370961.23262.16.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] nfs: add code to allow client to wait on lock callbacks From: Jeff Layton To: Anna Schumaker , trond.myklebust@primarydata.com Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 17:42:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <1473174760-29859-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <1473174760-29859-8-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 15:59 -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > On 09/06/2016 11:12 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > Add a waitqueue head to the client structure. Have clients set a > > wait > > on that queue prior to requesting a lock from the server. If the > > lock > > is blocked, then we can use that to wait for wakeups. > > > > Note that we do need to do this "manually" since we need to set the > > wait on the waitqueue prior to requesting the lock, but requesting > > a > > lock can involve activities that can block. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > > --- > >  fs/nfs/callback_proc.c    |  1 + > >  fs/nfs/nfs4client.c       |  1 + > >  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c         | 67 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > >  include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h |  1 + > >  4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c > > index a211af339f32..4ba6a8763f91 100644 > > --- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c > > +++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c > > @@ -645,6 +645,7 @@ __be32 nfs4_callback_notify_lock(struct > > cb_notify_lock_args *args, void *dummy, > >   fc_tbl = &cps->clp->cl_session->fc_slot_table; > >   > >   status = htonl(NFS4_OK); > > + __wake_up(&cps->clp->cl_lock_waitq, TASK_NORMAL, 0, &args- > > >cbnl_owner); > >   return status; > >  } > >  #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */ > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c > > index cd3b7cfdde16..89b7a794ff10 100644 > > --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c > > +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c > > @@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ struct nfs_client *nfs4_alloc_client(const > > struct nfs_client_initdata *cl_init) > >   clp->cl_minorversion = cl_init->minorversion; > >   clp->cl_mvops = nfs_v4_minor_ops[cl_init->minorversion]; > >   clp->cl_mig_gen = 1; > > + init_waitqueue_head(&clp->cl_lock_waitq); > >   return clp; > >   > >  error: > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c > > index 5573f19539a6..3a6669063c44 100644 > > --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c > > +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c > > @@ -5531,13 +5531,54 @@ int nfs4_proc_delegreturn(struct inode > > *inode, struct rpc_cred *cred, const nfs4 > >  #define NFS4_LOCK_MINTIMEOUT (1 * HZ) > >  #define NFS4_LOCK_MAXTIMEOUT (30 * HZ) > >   > > +struct nfs4_lock_waiter { > > + struct task_struct *task; > > + struct nfs_lowner *owner; > > + bool notified; > > +}; > > + > > +static int > > +nfs4_wake_lock_waiter(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned int mode, int > > flags, void *key) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + struct nfs4_lock_waiter *waiter = wait- > > >private; > > + struct nfs_lowner *lowner = key, *wowner = waiter- > > >owner; > > + > > + /* Don't wake anybody if the string looked bogus */ > > + if (!lowner->id && !lowner->s_dev) > > + return 0; > > + > > + /* Only wake if the callback was for the same owner */ > > + if (lowner->clientid != wowner->clientid || > > +     lowner->id != wowner->id  || > > +     lowner->s_dev != wowner->s_dev) > > + return 0; > > + > > + waiter->notified = true; > > + > > + /* override "private" so we can use default_wake_function > > */ > > + wait->private = waiter->task; > > + ret = autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, flags, key); > > + wait->private = waiter; > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > >  /*  > >   * sleep, with exponential backoff, and retry the LOCK operation.  > >   */ > >  static unsigned long > > -nfs4_set_lock_task_retry(unsigned long timeout) > > +nfs4_wait_for_lock_retry(unsigned long timeout, wait_queue_head_t > > *q, > > +  struct nfs4_lock_waiter *waiter) > >  { > > + unsigned long flags; > > + > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags); > > + if (waiter->notified) { > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags); > > + return timeout; > > + } > >   set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags); > >   freezable_schedule_timeout_unsafe(timeout); > >   timeout <<= 1; > >   if (timeout > NFS4_LOCK_MAXTIMEOUT) > > @@ -6232,10 +6273,30 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, > > struct file_lock *request) > >   return status; > >   > >   do { > > + struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp = request- > > >fl_u.nfs4_fl.owner; > > + struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(lsp- > > >ls_state->inode); > > + struct nfs_client *clp = server->nfs_client; > > + struct nfs_lowner owner = { .clientid = clp- > > >cl_clientid, > > +     .id = lsp- > > >ls_seqid.owner_id, > > +     .s_dev = server->s_dev > > }; > > + struct nfs4_lock_waiter waiter = { .task  = > > current, > > +    .owner = > > &owner, > > +    .notified = > > false }; > > + wait_queue_t wait; > > + > > + init_wait(&wait); > > + wait.private = &waiter; > > + wait.func = nfs4_wake_lock_waiter; > > + > > + add_wait_queue(&clp->cl_lock_waitq, &wait); > >   status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request); > > - if ((status != -EAGAIN) || IS_SETLK(cmd)) > > + if ((status != -EAGAIN) || IS_SETLK(cmd)) { > > + finish_wait(&clp->cl_lock_waitq, &wait); > >   break; > > - timeout = nfs4_set_lock_task_retry(timeout); > > + } > > + timeout = nfs4_wait_for_lock_retry(timeout, > > + &clp->cl_lock_waitq, > > &waiter); > > + finish_wait(&clp->cl_lock_waitq, &wait); > > I'm curious why you didn't turn everything in this do-while loop into > a new function?  This code might be cleaner that way :) > > Thanks, > Anna > I went through several iterations of this set before I found a scheme that would work. Your point is entirely valid. I'll move it into a helper function for the next posting. Thanks! > > > >   status = -ERESTARTSYS; > >   if (signalled()) > >   break; > > diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h > > index 14a762d2734d..fb2319a0ce65 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h > > +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h > > @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct nfs_client { > >  #define NFS_SP4_MACH_CRED_WRITE    5 /* WRITE */ > >  #define NFS_SP4_MACH_CRED_COMMIT   6 /* COMMIT */ > >  #define NFS_SP4_MACH_CRED_PNFS_CLEANUP  7 /* LAYOUTRETURN */ > > + wait_queue_head_t cl_lock_waitq; > >  #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4 */ > >   > >   /* Our own IP address, as a null-terminated string. > > > -- Jeff Layton