From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] xen/arm: support big.little SoC
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:31:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474561906.4393.395.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b87557d-39ee-0b1d-7163-00317571569f@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1720 bytes --]
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 12:24 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 22/09/16 09:43, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > Local migration basically --from the vcpu perspective-- means
> > create a
> > new vcpu, stop the original vcpu, copy the state from original to
> > new,
> > destroy the original vcpu and start the new one. My point is that
> > this
> > is not something that can be done within nor initiated by the
> > scheduler, e.g., during a context switch or a vcpu wakeup!
>
> By local migration, I meant from the perspective of the hypervisor.
> In
> the hypervisor you have to trap feature registers and other
> implementation defined registers to show the same value across all
> the
> physical CPUs.
>
You mean we trap feature registers during the (normal) execution of a
vcpu, because we want Xen to vet what's returned to the guest itself.
And that migration support, and hence the possibility that the guest
have been migrated to a cpu different than the one where it was
created, is already one of the reasons why this is necessary... right?
If yes, and if that's "all" we need, I think it should be fine.
> You don't need to recreate the vCPU every time you move from one set
> of
> CPUs to another one. Sorry for the confusion.
>
No, I am sorry... it's not you that you're making confusion, it's
probably me knowing to few about ARM, and did not think at the above
when you said "migration". :-)
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-22 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-19 2:08 [RFC 0/5] xen/arm: support big.little SoC van.freenix
2016-09-19 2:08 ` [RFC 1/5] xen/arm: domain_build: setting opt_dom0_max_vcpus according to cpupool0 info van.freenix
2016-09-19 2:08 ` [RFC 2/5] xen: cpupool: introduce cpupool_arch_info van.freenix
2016-09-19 2:08 ` [RFC 3/5] xen: cpupool: add arch cpupool hook van.freenix
2016-09-19 2:08 ` [RFC 4/5] xen/arm: move vpidr from arch_domain to arch_vcpu van.freenix
2016-09-19 2:08 ` [RFC 5/5] xen/arm: cpupool: implement arch_domain_cpupool_compatible van.freenix
2016-09-19 8:09 ` [RFC 0/5] xen/arm: support big.little SoC Julien Grall
2016-09-19 8:36 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-19 8:53 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-19 9:38 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-19 9:59 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-19 13:15 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-19 20:56 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-19 9:45 ` George Dunlap
2016-09-19 10:06 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-19 10:23 ` Juergen Gross
2016-09-19 17:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-19 21:03 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-19 22:55 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-20 0:01 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-20 0:54 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-20 10:03 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-20 10:27 ` George Dunlap
2016-09-20 15:34 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-20 17:24 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-20 19:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-20 19:41 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-20 20:17 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-21 8:38 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-21 9:22 ` George Dunlap
2016-09-21 12:35 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-21 15:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-21 10:15 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-21 12:28 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-21 15:06 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-22 9:45 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-22 11:21 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-23 2:38 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-21 10:09 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-21 10:22 ` George Dunlap
2016-09-21 13:06 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-21 15:45 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-21 19:28 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-22 6:16 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-22 8:43 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-22 11:24 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-22 16:31 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2016-09-23 13:56 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-21 18:13 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-21 19:11 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-21 19:21 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-21 23:45 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-22 6:49 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-22 8:50 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-22 9:27 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-22 9:51 ` George Dunlap
2016-09-22 10:09 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-22 10:39 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-22 10:13 ` Juergen Gross
2016-09-22 9:52 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-22 11:29 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-22 17:31 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-22 18:54 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-23 2:14 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-23 9:24 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-23 10:05 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-23 10:15 ` Julien Grall
2016-09-23 13:36 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-24 1:57 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-23 13:52 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-24 1:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-23 2:03 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-22 10:05 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-22 16:26 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-22 17:33 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-21 12:38 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-21 9:45 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-20 10:18 ` George Dunlap
2016-09-19 20:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-19 10:33 ` George Dunlap
2016-09-19 13:33 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-20 0:11 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-20 6:18 ` Peng Fan
2016-09-19 16:43 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-19 13:08 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1474561906.4393.395.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=van.freenix@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.