All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	autofs mailing list <autofs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] autofs - make mountpoint checks namespace aware
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 08:11:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474675869.3078.3.camel@themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87oa3e8m2v.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>

On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 14:15 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> writes:
> 
> 2> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> writes:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > > Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> writes:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Eric, Mateusz, I appreciate your spending time on this and
> > > > > > particularly
> > > > > > pointing
> > > > > > out my embarrassingly stupid is_local_mountpoint() usage mistake.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Please accept my apology for the inconvenience.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If all goes well (in testing) I'll have follow up patches to correct
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > fairly
> > > > > > soon.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Related question.  Do you happen to know how many mounts per mount
> > > > > namespace tend to be used?  It looks like it is going to be wise to
> > > > > put
> > > > > a configurable limit on that number.  And I would like the default to
> > > > > be
> > > > > something high enough most people don't care.  I believe autofs is
> > > > > likely where people tend to use the most mounts.
> > 
> > Yes, I agree, I did want to try and avoid changing the parameters to
> > ->d_mamange() but passing a struct path pointer might be better in the long
> > run
> > anyway.
> 
> Given that there is exactly one implementation of d_manage in the tree I
> don't imagine it will be disruptive to change that.

Yes, but it could be used by external modules.

And there's also have_submounts().

I can update that using the existing d_walk() infrastructure or take it (mostly)
into the autofs module and get rid of have_submounts().

I'll go with the former to start with and see what people think.

> 
> Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-24  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-14  6:14 [PATCH 1/4] fs - make is_local_mountpoint() usable by others Ian Kent
2016-09-14  6:14 ` Ian Kent
2016-09-14  6:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] fs - add have_local_submounts() Ian Kent
2016-09-14  6:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] autofs - make mountpoint checks namespace aware Ian Kent
2016-09-14 17:28   ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-15  0:09     ` Ian Kent
2016-09-15  0:09       ` Ian Kent
2016-09-15  0:32       ` Omar Sandoval
2016-09-15  2:08       ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-15  2:08         ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-15  4:12         ` Ian Kent
2016-09-15  4:12           ` Ian Kent
2016-09-15  8:19           ` Ian Kent
2016-09-16  0:47           ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-16  0:47             ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-16  2:58             ` Ian Kent
2016-09-19  0:58               ` Ian Kent
2016-09-19  0:58                 ` Ian Kent
2016-09-20 16:09                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-20 16:09                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-15  1:03     ` Ian Kent
2016-09-15  1:03       ` Ian Kent
2016-09-16 21:14   ` Omar Sandoval
2016-09-16 21:14     ` Omar Sandoval
2016-09-17 20:10   ` Mateusz Guzik
2016-09-17 20:10     ` Mateusz Guzik
2016-09-19  1:36     ` Ian Kent
2016-09-19  1:36       ` Ian Kent
2016-09-20 16:50       ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-20 22:44         ` Ian Kent
2016-09-20 23:00           ` Ian Kent
2016-09-20 23:00             ` Ian Kent
2016-09-22  1:33             ` Ian Kent
2016-09-22  1:33               ` Ian Kent
2016-09-22 15:43               ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-23  0:55                 ` Ian Kent
2016-09-23  0:55                   ` Ian Kent
2016-09-23  1:37                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-23  4:26                     ` Ian Kent
2016-09-23 12:00                       ` Ian Kent
2016-09-28 10:18                         ` Ian Kent
2016-09-23 19:15                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-24  0:11                         ` Ian Kent [this message]
2016-09-26 16:05                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-27  1:52                             ` Ian Kent
2016-09-27  1:52                               ` Ian Kent
2016-09-27 13:14                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-27 13:14                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-09-28  0:19                                 ` Ian Kent
2016-09-28  0:19                                   ` Ian Kent
2016-09-14  6:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] fs - remove unused have_submounts() function Ian Kent
2016-09-14  6:14   ` Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1474675869.3078.3.camel@themaw.net \
    --to=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mguzik@redhat.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.