From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757097AbcJGVpF (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:45:05 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0220.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.220]:38676 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753178AbcJGVo5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:44:57 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:960:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:2904:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3868:3871:3872:3873:3874:4321:5007:6691:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11783:11914:12043:12296:12740:13069:13311:13357:13439:13894:14659:14721:21080:21451:30012:30054:30060:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: coal88_6138dab9efb4b X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1930 Message-ID: <1475876667.1945.28.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] trivial for 4.9 From: Joe Perches To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jiri Kosina , Colin Ian King , Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:44:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1475870688.1945.13.camel@perches.com> <1475871538.1945.15.camel@perches.com> <1475872401.1945.17.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.0-2ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 14:06 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > And btw, even without an explicit KERN_, you should still not > get any interleaving. Only an _explicit_ KERN_CONT should cause > interleaving, and dammit, if some interrupt does a KERN_CONT without > having had a non-cont printk before it, that code is buggy and should > damn well be fixed. That's not true. KERN_CONT is a no-op. Bare printks interleave. $ git grep KERN_CONT include/linux/kern_levels.h include/linux/kern_levels.h:#define KERN_CONT   "" I think it was like 2007 when I first suggested _not_ having newlines on the pr_ macros that were eventually added by Emil Medve.