All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	hmh@hmh.eng.br
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Report Intel platform_id in /proc/cpuinfo
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:23:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476833008-8293-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> (raw)

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

We have a need to distinguish systems based on their platform ID.
For example this is useful to distinguish systems with L4 cache
versus ones without.

There is a 3 bit identifier (also called processor flags) in
the IA32_PLATFORM_ID MSR that can give a more fine grained
identification of the CPU than just the model number/stepping.

IA32_PLATFORM_ID is architectural.

The MSR can be also accessed through /dev/cpu/*/msr, but that
requires root and is awkward.

The patch moves the reading of PLATFORM_INFO from the
(late) microcode driver code into the main intel CPU initialization
path and then also prints it in /proc/cpuinfo

v2: Handle 0 platform_id. Fix commit message.
v3: Move some code to cpu/intel.c
v4: Update description too.
v5: Move msr probe code out of line to workaround potential gcc 6 bug.
This fixes booting on all 0day systems.
Cc: hmh@hmh.eng.br
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h      |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c           | 15 +++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c |  8 ++------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c            |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 63def9537a2d..c1313b3f3e59 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
 	/* Index into per_cpu list: */
 	u16			cpu_index;
 	u32			microcode;
+	u32			platform_id;
+	u8			has_platform_id;
 };
 
 #define X86_VENDOR_INTEL	0
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index fcd484d2bb03..7da7f008cee0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -61,6 +61,19 @@ void check_mpx_erratum(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	}
 }
 
+/* noinline to work around problem with gcc 6.2 */
+static noinline void probe_platformid(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+	if ((c->x86_model >= 5) || (c->x86 > 6)) {
+		unsigned val[2];
+
+		/* get processor flags from MSR 0x17 */
+		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID, val[0], val[1]);
+		c->platform_id = (val[1] >> 18) & 7;
+		c->has_platform_id = true;
+	}
+}
+
 static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 	u64 misc_enable;
@@ -211,6 +224,8 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	}
 
 	check_mpx_erratum(c);
+
+	probe_platformid(c);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index cdc0deab00c9..fab07e49192e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -855,17 +855,13 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
 {
 	static struct cpu_signature prev;
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
-	unsigned int val[2];
 
 	memset(csig, 0, sizeof(*csig));
 
 	csig->sig = cpuid_eax(0x00000001);
 
-	if ((c->x86_model >= 5) || (c->x86 > 6)) {
-		/* get processor flags from MSR 0x17 */
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID, val[0], val[1]);
-		csig->pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
-	}
+	if (c->has_platform_id)
+		csig->pf = 1 << c->platform_id;
 
 	csig->rev = c->microcode;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index 18ca99f2798b..5345d50ed709 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		seq_puts(m, "stepping\t: unknown\n");
 	if (c->microcode)
 		seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode);
+	if (c->has_platform_id)
+		seq_printf(m, "platform_id\t: %d\n", c->platform_id);
 
 	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
 		unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
-- 
2.5.5

             reply	other threads:[~2016-10-18 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-18 23:23 Andi Kleen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-23 18:02 [PATCH] x86: Report Intel platform_id in /proc/cpuinfo Andi Kleen
2016-09-23  0:48 Andi Kleen
2016-09-23  8:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-06-02 15:51 Andi Kleen
2016-06-21 16:05 ` Andi Kleen
2016-06-22 11:54   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-09-21 12:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-05-31 21:24 Andi Kleen
2016-06-02 18:27 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-06-02 22:54   ` Andi Kleen
2016-05-05 10:12 Andi Kleen
2016-05-06 12:42 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1476833008-8293-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.