[PATCH V4 0/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts

[PATCH V4 0/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts

[Sinan Kaya]

By the time ACPI gets initialized, this code tries to determine an
IRQ number based on penalty values in this array. It will try to locate
the IRQ with the least penalty assignment so that interrupt sharing is
avoided if possible.

A couple of notes about the external APIs:
1. These API can be called before the ACPI is started. Therefore, one
cannot assume that the PCI link objects are initialized for calculating
penalties.
2. The polarity and trigger information passed via the
acpi_penalize_sci_irq from the BIOS may not match what the IRQ subsystem
is reporting as the call might have been placed before the IRQ is
registered by the interrupt subsystem.

The reverted changes were in the direction to remove these external API and
try to calculate the penalties at runtime for the ISA, SCI as well as PCI
IRQS.
This didn't work out well with the existing platforms.

V4:
* Drop ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts
* A new patch to isolate early boot ISA penalty calculations from dynamic
penalty calculation by directly modifying the array members in
("ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages")
* Now that we isolated both SCI and ISA interrupts, revert commit ("Revert
"ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"") and commit
("487cf917ed0d
(Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()")
to share code between ISA and PCI penalties as originally intended.

V3:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg536208.html
* drop patch #1 as discussed with Bjorn
* add patch #3 to track SCI irq and penalty separately

V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/1/106
* Commit message updates

V1:
http://lists-archives.com/linux-kernel/28673954-revert-acpi-pci-irq-reduce-static-irq-array-size-to-16.html
* initial implementation

Sinan Kaya (3):
  ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages
  Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"
  Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
 arch/x86/pci/acpi.c         |  1 -
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 72 ++++++++++++---------------------------------
 include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |  1 -
 include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH V4 0/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts

[Sinan Kaya]

By the time ACPI gets initialized, this code tries to determine an
IRQ number based on penalty values in this array. It will try to locate
the IRQ with the least penalty assignment so that interrupt sharing is
avoided if possible.

A couple of notes about the external APIs:
1. These API can be called before the ACPI is started. Therefore, one
cannot assume that the PCI link objects are initialized for calculating
penalties.
2. The polarity and trigger information passed via the
acpi_penalize_sci_irq from the BIOS may not match what the IRQ subsystem
is reporting as the call might have been placed before the IRQ is
registered by the interrupt subsystem.

The reverted changes were in the direction to remove these external API and
try to calculate the penalties at runtime for the ISA, SCI as well as PCI
IRQS.
This didn't work out well with the existing platforms.

V4:
* Drop ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts
* A new patch to isolate early boot ISA penalty calculations from dynamic
penalty calculation by directly modifying the array members in
("ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages")
* Now that we isolated both SCI and ISA interrupts, revert commit ("Revert
"ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"") and commit
("487cf917ed0d
(Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()")
to share code between ISA and PCI penalties as originally intended.

V3:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg536208.html
* drop patch #1 as discussed with Bjorn
* add patch #3 to track SCI irq and penalty separately

V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/1/106
* Commit message updates

V1:
http://lists-archives.com/linux-kernel/28673954-revert-acpi-pci-irq-reduce-static-irq-array-size-to-16.html
* initial implementation

Sinan Kaya (3):
  ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages
  Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"
  Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
 arch/x86/pci/acpi.c         |  1 -
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 72 ++++++++++++---------------------------------
 include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |  1 -
 include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V4 0/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts

[Sinan Kaya]

By the time ACPI gets initialized, this code tries to determine an
IRQ number based on penalty values in this array. It will try to locate
the IRQ with the least penalty assignment so that interrupt sharing is
avoided if possible.

A couple of notes about the external APIs:
1. These API can be called before the ACPI is started. Therefore, one
cannot assume that the PCI link objects are initialized for calculating
penalties.
2. The polarity and trigger information passed via the
acpi_penalize_sci_irq from the BIOS may not match what the IRQ subsystem
is reporting as the call might have been placed before the IRQ is
registered by the interrupt subsystem.

The reverted changes were in the direction to remove these external API and
try to calculate the penalties at runtime for the ISA, SCI as well as PCI
IRQS.
This didn't work out well with the existing platforms.

V4:
* Drop ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts
* A new patch to isolate early boot ISA penalty calculations from dynamic
penalty calculation by directly modifying the array members in
("ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages")
* Now that we isolated both SCI and ISA interrupts, revert commit ("Revert
"ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"") and commit
("487cf917ed0d
(Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()")
to share code between ISA and PCI penalties as originally intended.

V3:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg536208.html
* drop patch #1 as discussed with Bjorn
* add patch #3 to track SCI irq and penalty separately

V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/1/106
* Commit message updates

V1:
http://lists-archives.com/linux-kernel/28673954-revert-acpi-pci-irq-reduce-static-irq-array-size-to-16.html
* initial implementation

Sinan Kaya (3):
  ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages
  Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"
  Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
 arch/x86/pci/acpi.c         |  1 -
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 72 ++++++++++++---------------------------------
 include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |  1 -
 include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Sinan Kaya]

The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
active parameter.
3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.

acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
before the ACPI subsystem is started.

These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
 			continue;
 
 		if (used)
-			new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+			new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
 					PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
 		else
 			new_penalty = 0;
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
 void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
 {
 	if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
-		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
 		  (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Sinan Kaya]

The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
active parameter.
3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.

acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
before the ACPI subsystem is started.

These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
 			continue;
 
 		if (used)
-			new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+			new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
 					PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
 		else
 			new_penalty = 0;
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
 void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
 {
 	if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
-		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
 		  (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Sinan Kaya]

The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
active parameter.
3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.

acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
before the ACPI subsystem is started.

These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
 			continue;
 
 		if (used)
-			new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+			new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
 					PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
 		else
 			new_penalty = 0;
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
 void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
 {
 	if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
-		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
 		  (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Sinan Kaya]

The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.

The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.

The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.

However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
penalties are calculated.

To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).

For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.

Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")
---
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
 		polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
 
 	mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
+	acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
 
 	/*
 	 * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index 4f37938..294b190 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
 
 static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
+static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
 
 /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             PCI Link Device Management
@@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
 {
 	int penalty = 0;
 
-	/*
-	* Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
-	* with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
-	* use for PCI IRQs.
-	*/
-	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
-		u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
-
-		if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
-			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
-		else
-			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
-	}
+	if (irq == sci_irq)
+		penalty += sci_penalty;
 
 	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
 		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
 
-	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
-	return penalty;
+	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
 }
 
 int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
@@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
 		    acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
 }
 
+void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
+{
+	sci_irq = irq;
+
+	if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
+	    polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
+		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
+	else
+		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
+}
+
 /*
  * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
  * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
 int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
 void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
 bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
+void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
 void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
 
 extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Sinan Kaya]

The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.

The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.

The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.

However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
penalties are calculated.

To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).

For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.

Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")
---
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
 		polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
 
 	mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
+	acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
 
 	/*
 	 * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index 4f37938..294b190 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
 
 static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
+static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
 
 /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             PCI Link Device Management
@@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
 {
 	int penalty = 0;
 
-	/*
-	* Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
-	* with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
-	* use for PCI IRQs.
-	*/
-	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
-		u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
-
-		if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
-			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
-		else
-			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
-	}
+	if (irq == sci_irq)
+		penalty += sci_penalty;
 
 	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
 		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
 
-	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
-	return penalty;
+	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
 }
 
 int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
@@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
 		    acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
 }
 
+void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
+{
+	sci_irq = irq;
+
+	if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
+	    polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
+		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
+	else
+		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
+}
+
 /*
  * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
  * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
 int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
 void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
 bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
+void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
 void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
 
 extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Sinan Kaya]

The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.

The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.

The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.

However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
penalties are calculated.

To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).

For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.

Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")
---
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
 		polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
 
 	mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
+	acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
 
 	/*
 	 * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index 4f37938..294b190 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
 
 static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
+static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
 
 /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             PCI Link Device Management
@@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
 {
 	int penalty = 0;
 
-	/*
-	* Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
-	* with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
-	* use for PCI IRQs.
-	*/
-	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
-		u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
-
-		if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
-			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
-		else
-			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
-	}
+	if (irq == sci_irq)
+		penalty += sci_penalty;
 
 	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
 		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
 
-	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
-	return penalty;
+	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
 }
 
 int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
@@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
 		    acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
 }
 
+void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
+{
+	sci_irq = irq;
+
+	if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
+	    polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
+		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
+	else
+		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
+}
+
 /*
  * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
  * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
 int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
 void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
 bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
+void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
 void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
 
 extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Sinan Kaya]

This reverts commit f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty
calculation") and commit 487cf917ed0d ("revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove
redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()"").

Now that we understand the real issue (SCI and ISA penalty getting
calculated before ACPI start), there is no need for special handling
for ISA interrupts.

Let's try to simplify the code one more time to share code.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/x86/pci/acpi.c         |  1 -
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 44 +++++---------------------------------------
 include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |  1 -
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index 3cd6983..b2a4e2a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
-	acpi_irq_penalty_init();
 	pcibios_enable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_enable;
 	pcibios_disable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_disable;
 	x86_init.pci.init_irq = x86_init_noop;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index 294b190..dd14d78 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
 		 * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
 		 * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
 		 */
-		if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
+		if ((link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq) &&
+				(link->irq.initialized == 1))
 			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
 
 		/*
@@ -501,45 +502,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
 		penalty += sci_penalty;
 
 	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
-		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
+		penalty += acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
 
-	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
-}
-
-int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
-{
-	struct acpi_pci_link *link;
-	int i;
-
-	/*
-	 * Update penalties to facilitate IRQ balancing.
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
-
-		/*
-		 * reflect the possible and active irqs in the penalty table --
-		 * useful for breaking ties.
-		 */
-		if (link->irq.possible_count) {
-			int penalty =
-			    PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
-			    link->irq.possible_count;
-
-			for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++) {
-				if (link->irq.possible[i] < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
-					acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.
-							 possible[i]] +=
-					    penalty;
-			}
-
-		} else if (link->irq.active &&
-				(link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)) {
-			acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
-			    PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return 0;
+	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
+	return penalty;
 }
 
 static int acpi_irq_balance = -1;	/* 0: static, 1: balance */
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
index 29c6912..797ae2e 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
 
 /* ACPI PCI Interrupt Link (pci_link.c) */
 
-int acpi_irq_penalty_init(void);
 int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_handle handle, int index, int *triggering,
 			       int *polarity, char **name);
 int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle handle);
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Sinan Kaya]

This reverts commit f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty
calculation") and commit 487cf917ed0d ("revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove
redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()"").

Now that we understand the real issue (SCI and ISA penalty getting
calculated before ACPI start), there is no need for special handling
for ISA interrupts.

Let's try to simplify the code one more time to share code.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/x86/pci/acpi.c         |  1 -
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 44 +++++---------------------------------------
 include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |  1 -
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index 3cd6983..b2a4e2a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
-	acpi_irq_penalty_init();
 	pcibios_enable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_enable;
 	pcibios_disable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_disable;
 	x86_init.pci.init_irq = x86_init_noop;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index 294b190..dd14d78 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
 		 * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
 		 * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
 		 */
-		if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
+		if ((link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq) &&
+				(link->irq.initialized == 1))
 			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
 
 		/*
@@ -501,45 +502,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
 		penalty += sci_penalty;
 
 	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
-		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
+		penalty += acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
 
-	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
-}
-
-int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
-{
-	struct acpi_pci_link *link;
-	int i;
-
-	/*
-	 * Update penalties to facilitate IRQ balancing.
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
-
-		/*
-		 * reflect the possible and active irqs in the penalty table --
-		 * useful for breaking ties.
-		 */
-		if (link->irq.possible_count) {
-			int penalty =
-			    PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
-			    link->irq.possible_count;
-
-			for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++) {
-				if (link->irq.possible[i] < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
-					acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.
-							 possible[i]] +=
-					    penalty;
-			}
-
-		} else if (link->irq.active &&
-				(link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)) {
-			acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
-			    PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return 0;
+	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
+	return penalty;
 }
 
 static int acpi_irq_balance = -1;	/* 0: static, 1: balance */
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
index 29c6912..797ae2e 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
 
 /* ACPI PCI Interrupt Link (pci_link.c) */
 
-int acpi_irq_penalty_init(void);
 int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_handle handle, int index, int *triggering,
 			       int *polarity, char **name);
 int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle handle);
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Sinan Kaya]

This reverts commit f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty
calculation") and commit 487cf917ed0d ("revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove
redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()"").

Now that we understand the real issue (SCI and ISA penalty getting
calculated before ACPI start), there is no need for special handling
for ISA interrupts.

Let's try to simplify the code one more time to share code.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/x86/pci/acpi.c         |  1 -
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 44 +++++---------------------------------------
 include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |  1 -
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index 3cd6983..b2a4e2a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
-	acpi_irq_penalty_init();
 	pcibios_enable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_enable;
 	pcibios_disable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_disable;
 	x86_init.pci.init_irq = x86_init_noop;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index 294b190..dd14d78 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
 		 * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
 		 * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
 		 */
-		if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
+		if ((link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq) &&
+				(link->irq.initialized == 1))
 			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
 
 		/*
@@ -501,45 +502,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
 		penalty += sci_penalty;
 
 	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
-		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
+		penalty += acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
 
-	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
-}
-
-int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
-{
-	struct acpi_pci_link *link;
-	int i;
-
-	/*
-	 * Update penalties to facilitate IRQ balancing.
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
-
-		/*
-		 * reflect the possible and active irqs in the penalty table --
-		 * useful for breaking ties.
-		 */
-		if (link->irq.possible_count) {
-			int penalty =
-			    PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
-			    link->irq.possible_count;
-
-			for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++) {
-				if (link->irq.possible[i] < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
-					acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.
-							 possible[i]] +=
-					    penalty;
-			}
-
-		} else if (link->irq.active &&
-				(link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)) {
-			acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
-			    PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return 0;
+	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
+	return penalty;
 }
 
 static int acpi_irq_balance = -1;	/* 0: static, 1: balance */
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
index 29c6912..797ae2e 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
 
 /* ACPI PCI Interrupt Link (pci_link.c) */
 
-int acpi_irq_penalty_init(void);
 int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_handle handle, int index, int *triggering,
 			       int *polarity, char **name);
 int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle handle);
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
> 1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
> 2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
> active parameter.
> 3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
> 4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.
>
> acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
> before the ACPI subsystem is started.
>
> These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>                         continue;
>
>                 if (used)
> -                       new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +                       new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>                                         PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
>                 else
>                         new_penalty = 0;
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>  {
>         if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
> -               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +

This looks slightly odd.  What about

+               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +=

>                   (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>  }
>

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
> 1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
> 2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
> active parameter.
> 3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
> 4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.
>
> acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
> before the ACPI subsystem is started.
>
> These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>                         continue;
>
>                 if (used)
> -                       new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +                       new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>                                         PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
>                 else
>                         new_penalty = 0;
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>  {
>         if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
> -               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +

This looks slightly odd.  What about

+               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +=

>                   (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>  }
>

Thanks,
Rafael

[PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
> 1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
> 2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
> active parameter.
> 3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
> 4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.
>
> acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
> before the ACPI subsystem is started.
>
> These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>                         continue;
>
>                 if (used)
> -                       new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +                       new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>                                         PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
>                 else
>                         new_penalty = 0;
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>  {
>         if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
> -               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +

This looks slightly odd.  What about

+               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +=

>                   (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>  }
>

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:02PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
> 1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
> 2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
> active parameter.
> 3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
> 4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.
> 
> acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
> before the ACPI subsystem is started.
> 
> These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.

I don't mind this patch, but the changelog doesn't tell me what's
broken and why we need this fix.  Apparently acpi_irq_get_penalty()
doesn't work before ACPI is initialized, but I don't see *why* it
wouldn't work.

However, I see one bug it *does* fix: we do not store the SCI penalty
in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]
only holds ISA IRQ penalties, and there's no guarantee that the SCI is
an ISA IRQ.  But prior to this patch, we added in the SCI penalty to
the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] entry when the SCI was an ISA IRQ, which
makes acpi_irq_get_penalty() return the wrong thing.  Consider:

  Initially     acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = 0.
  Assume        sci_interrupt = 9.
  Then          acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X.
  If we call    acpi_penalize_isa_irq(9, 1),
  it sets       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = X,
  and now       acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X + X.

I'd propose a changelog like this:

  We do not want to store the SCI penalty in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]
  table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] only holds ISA IRQ penalties and
  there's no guarantee that the SCI is an ISA IRQ.  We add in the SCI
  penalty as a special case in acpi_irq_get_penalty().

  But if we called acpi_penalize_isa_irq() or acpi_irq_penalty_update()
  for an SCI that happened to be an ISA IRQ, they stored the SCI
  penalty (part of the acpi_irq_get_penalty() return value) in
  acpi_isa_irq_penalty[].  Subsequent calls to acpi_irq_get_penalty()
  returned a penalty that included *two* SCI penalties.

If this actually fixes a worse problem related to ACPI initialization,
of course you should detail that.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (used)
> -			new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +			new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>  					PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
>  		else
>  			new_penalty = 0;
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>  {
>  	if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
> -		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>  		  (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:02PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
> 1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
> 2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
> active parameter.
> 3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
> 4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.
> 
> acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
> before the ACPI subsystem is started.
> 
> These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.

I don't mind this patch, but the changelog doesn't tell me what's
broken and why we need this fix.  Apparently acpi_irq_get_penalty()
doesn't work before ACPI is initialized, but I don't see *why* it
wouldn't work.

However, I see one bug it *does* fix: we do not store the SCI penalty
in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]
only holds ISA IRQ penalties, and there's no guarantee that the SCI is
an ISA IRQ.  But prior to this patch, we added in the SCI penalty to
the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] entry when the SCI was an ISA IRQ, which
makes acpi_irq_get_penalty() return the wrong thing.  Consider:

  Initially     acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = 0.
  Assume        sci_interrupt = 9.
  Then          acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X.
  If we call    acpi_penalize_isa_irq(9, 1),
  it sets       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = X,
  and now       acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X + X.

I'd propose a changelog like this:

  We do not want to store the SCI penalty in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]
  table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] only holds ISA IRQ penalties and
  there's no guarantee that the SCI is an ISA IRQ.  We add in the SCI
  penalty as a special case in acpi_irq_get_penalty().

  But if we called acpi_penalize_isa_irq() or acpi_irq_penalty_update()
  for an SCI that happened to be an ISA IRQ, they stored the SCI
  penalty (part of the acpi_irq_get_penalty() return value) in
  acpi_isa_irq_penalty[].  Subsequent calls to acpi_irq_get_penalty()
  returned a penalty that included *two* SCI penalties.

If this actually fixes a worse problem related to ACPI initialization,
of course you should detail that.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (used)
> -			new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +			new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>  					PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
>  		else
>  			new_penalty = 0;
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>  {
>  	if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
> -		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>  		  (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:03PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
> and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.
> 
> The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
> reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.
> 
> The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
> ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
> penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
> on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.
> 
> However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
> types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
> leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
> irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
> question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
> penalties are calculated.
> 
> To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
> It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
> PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
> otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
> for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
> these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
> one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).
> 
> For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
> penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.

I like this patch fine, except for the changelog.  I don't think it's
useful to describe this as a revert and give all the historical
details.  I think the important part is something like this:

  We previously used irq_get_trigger_type(irq) to help compute the
  penalty for the SCI, but that depends on the SCI having been
  registered already.  Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can
  tell us the SCI IRQ, trigger, and polarity so we can compute the
  penalty even before the SCI has been registered.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")

"commit" is redundant; it's sufficient to say:

  Fixes: 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")

In fact, I don't think you really need to include "commit" in the
reference to 9e5ed6d1fb87 above either.

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
>  		polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
>  
>  	mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> +	acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 4f37938..294b190 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
>  
>  static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
> +static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
>  
>  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                              PCI Link Device Management
> @@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
>  {
>  	int penalty = 0;
>  
> -	/*
> -	* Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> -	* with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> -	* use for PCI IRQs.
> -	*/
> -	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> -		u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> -
> -		if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> -		else
> -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> -	}
> +	if (irq == sci_irq)
> +		penalty += sci_penalty;
>  
>  	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
>  		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
>  
> -	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> -	return penalty;
> +	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
>  }
>  
>  int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> @@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
>  		    acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
>  }
>  
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> +	sci_irq = irq;
> +
> +	if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
> +	    polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> +	else
> +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
>   * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
>  int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
>  bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
>  void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>  
>  extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:03PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
> and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.
> 
> The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
> reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.
> 
> The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
> ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
> penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
> on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.
> 
> However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
> types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
> leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
> irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
> question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
> penalties are calculated.
> 
> To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
> It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
> PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
> otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
> for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
> these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
> one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).
> 
> For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
> penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.

I like this patch fine, except for the changelog.  I don't think it's
useful to describe this as a revert and give all the historical
details.  I think the important part is something like this:

  We previously used irq_get_trigger_type(irq) to help compute the
  penalty for the SCI, but that depends on the SCI having been
  registered already.  Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can
  tell us the SCI IRQ, trigger, and polarity so we can compute the
  penalty even before the SCI has been registered.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")

"commit" is redundant; it's sufficient to say:

  Fixes: 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")

In fact, I don't think you really need to include "commit" in the
reference to 9e5ed6d1fb87 above either.

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
>  		polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
>  
>  	mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> +	acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 4f37938..294b190 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
>  
>  static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
> +static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
>  
>  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                              PCI Link Device Management
> @@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
>  {
>  	int penalty = 0;
>  
> -	/*
> -	* Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> -	* with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> -	* use for PCI IRQs.
> -	*/
> -	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> -		u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> -
> -		if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> -		else
> -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> -	}
> +	if (irq == sci_irq)
> +		penalty += sci_penalty;
>  
>  	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
>  		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
>  
> -	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> -	return penalty;
> +	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
>  }
>  
>  int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> @@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
>  		    acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
>  }
>  
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> +	sci_irq = irq;
> +
> +	if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
> +	    polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> +	else
> +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
>   * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
>  int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
>  bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
>  void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>  
>  extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:04PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> This reverts commit f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty
> calculation") and commit 487cf917ed0d ("revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove
> redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()"").
> 
> Now that we understand the real issue (SCI and ISA penalty getting
> calculated before ACPI start), there is no need for special handling
> for ISA interrupts.
> 
> Let's try to simplify the code one more time to share code.

I'm sort of OK with this, but it's not exactly a revert of the above
(the commits you mention don't check "link->irq.initialized == 1".

Previously acpi_irq_penalty_init() looked at _PRS info ("possible"
IRQs), but now we won't.  Maybe that's good; I dunno.  But it should
be mentioned.

And I don't think it fixes a user-visible problem, so it doesn't need
to be applied immediately.  I'm not sure this is worth doing by
itself; maybe it should wait until we can do more cleanup and think
about all these issues together?

> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/pci/acpi.c         |  1 -
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 44 +++++---------------------------------------
>  include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |  1 -
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> index 3cd6983..b2a4e2a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
> -	acpi_irq_penalty_init();
>  	pcibios_enable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_enable;
>  	pcibios_disable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_disable;
>  	x86_init.pci.init_irq = x86_init_noop;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 294b190..dd14d78 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
>  		 * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
>  		 * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
>  		 */
> -		if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
> +		if ((link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq) &&
> +				(link->irq.initialized == 1))
>  			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -501,45 +502,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
>  		penalty += sci_penalty;
>  
>  	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> -		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
> +		penalty += acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
>  
> -	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> -}
> -
> -int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> -{
> -	struct acpi_pci_link *link;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Update penalties to facilitate IRQ balancing.
> -	 */
> -	list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * reflect the possible and active irqs in the penalty table --
> -		 * useful for breaking ties.
> -		 */
> -		if (link->irq.possible_count) {
> -			int penalty =
> -			    PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
> -			    link->irq.possible_count;
> -
> -			for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++) {
> -				if (link->irq.possible[i] < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> -					acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.
> -							 possible[i]] +=
> -					    penalty;
> -			}
> -
> -		} else if (link->irq.active &&
> -				(link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)) {
> -			acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
> -			    PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> +	return penalty;
>  }
>  
>  static int acpi_irq_balance = -1;	/* 0: static, 1: balance */
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> index 29c6912..797ae2e 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
>  
>  /* ACPI PCI Interrupt Link (pci_link.c) */
>  
> -int acpi_irq_penalty_init(void);
>  int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_handle handle, int index, int *triggering,
>  			       int *polarity, char **name);
>  int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle handle);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:04PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> This reverts commit f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty
> calculation") and commit 487cf917ed0d ("revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove
> redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()"").
> 
> Now that we understand the real issue (SCI and ISA penalty getting
> calculated before ACPI start), there is no need for special handling
> for ISA interrupts.
> 
> Let's try to simplify the code one more time to share code.

I'm sort of OK with this, but it's not exactly a revert of the above
(the commits you mention don't check "link->irq.initialized == 1".

Previously acpi_irq_penalty_init() looked at _PRS info ("possible"
IRQs), but now we won't.  Maybe that's good; I dunno.  But it should
be mentioned.

And I don't think it fixes a user-visible problem, so it doesn't need
to be applied immediately.  I'm not sure this is worth doing by
itself; maybe it should wait until we can do more cleanup and think
about all these issues together?

> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/pci/acpi.c         |  1 -
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 44 +++++---------------------------------------
>  include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |  1 -
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> index 3cd6983..b2a4e2a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
> -	acpi_irq_penalty_init();
>  	pcibios_enable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_enable;
>  	pcibios_disable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_disable;
>  	x86_init.pci.init_irq = x86_init_noop;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 294b190..dd14d78 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
>  		 * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
>  		 * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
>  		 */
> -		if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
> +		if ((link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq) &&
> +				(link->irq.initialized == 1))
>  			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -501,45 +502,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
>  		penalty += sci_penalty;
>  
>  	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> -		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
> +		penalty += acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
>  
> -	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> -}
> -
> -int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> -{
> -	struct acpi_pci_link *link;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Update penalties to facilitate IRQ balancing.
> -	 */
> -	list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * reflect the possible and active irqs in the penalty table --
> -		 * useful for breaking ties.
> -		 */
> -		if (link->irq.possible_count) {
> -			int penalty =
> -			    PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
> -			    link->irq.possible_count;
> -
> -			for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++) {
> -				if (link->irq.possible[i] < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> -					acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.
> -							 possible[i]] +=
> -					    penalty;
> -			}
> -
> -		} else if (link->irq.active &&
> -				(link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)) {
> -			acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
> -			    PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> +	return penalty;
>  }
>  
>  static int acpi_irq_balance = -1;	/* 0: static, 1: balance */
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> index 29c6912..797ae2e 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
>  
>  /* ACPI PCI Interrupt Link (pci_link.c) */
>  
> -int acpi_irq_penalty_init(void);
>  int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_handle handle, int index, int *triggering,
>  			       int *polarity, char **name);
>  int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle handle);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/20/2016 7:31 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> Let's try to simplify the code one more time to share code.
> I'm sort of OK with this, but it's not exactly a revert of the above
> (the commits you mention don't check "link->irq.initialized == 1".

I can split the initialized bit. If I remove it from this commit, it can
break the git bisect. That's why, I folded it into this review. I
briefly mentioned about it in the cover letter. It might not be quiet
clear.

> 
> Previously acpi_irq_penalty_init() looked at _PRS info ("possible"
> IRQs), but now we won't.  Maybe that's good; I dunno.  But it should
> be mentioned.

I'm directing all IRQs to  acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty function. 
acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty checks for the possible values here from
_PRS.

/*
 * penalize the IRQs PCI might use, but not as severely.
 */
for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++)
	if (link->irq.possible[i] == irq)
		penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
			link->irq.possible_count;

> 
> And I don't think it fixes a user-visible problem, so it doesn't need
> to be applied immediately.  I'm not sure this is worth doing by
> itself; maybe it should wait until we can do more cleanup and think
> about all these issues together?
> 

It does fix the PCI_USING penalty assignment. 

                if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
                         penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;


If we drop this patch, then we need
[PATCH V3 1/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2547605

as somebody needs to increment the penalty with PCI_USING when IRQ is assigned
for a given ISA IRQ.

We might as well take [PATCH V4 1/3], [PATCH V4 2/3] and [PATCH V3 1/3]
for this regression.


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/20/2016 7:31 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> Let's try to simplify the code one more time to share code.
> I'm sort of OK with this, but it's not exactly a revert of the above
> (the commits you mention don't check "link->irq.initialized == 1".

I can split the initialized bit. If I remove it from this commit, it can
break the git bisect. That's why, I folded it into this review. I
briefly mentioned about it in the cover letter. It might not be quiet
clear.

> 
> Previously acpi_irq_penalty_init() looked at _PRS info ("possible"
> IRQs), but now we won't.  Maybe that's good; I dunno.  But it should
> be mentioned.

I'm directing all IRQs to  acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty function. 
acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty checks for the possible values here from
_PRS.

/*
 * penalize the IRQs PCI might use, but not as severely.
 */
for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++)
	if (link->irq.possible[i] == irq)
		penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
			link->irq.possible_count;

> 
> And I don't think it fixes a user-visible problem, so it doesn't need
> to be applied immediately.  I'm not sure this is worth doing by
> itself; maybe it should wait until we can do more cleanup and think
> about all these issues together?
> 

It does fix the PCI_USING penalty assignment. 

                if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
                         penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;


If we drop this patch, then we need
[PATCH V3 1/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2547605

as somebody needs to increment the penalty with PCI_USING when IRQ is assigned
for a given ISA IRQ.

We might as well take [PATCH V4 1/3], [PATCH V4 2/3] and [PATCH V3 1/3]
for this regression.


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 08:39:30PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:02PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
> > 1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
> > 2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
> > active parameter.
> > 3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
> > 4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.
> > 
> > acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
> > before the ACPI subsystem is started.
> > 
> > These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.
> 
> I don't mind this patch, but the changelog doesn't tell me what's
> broken and why we need this fix.  Apparently acpi_irq_get_penalty()
> doesn't work before ACPI is initialized, but I don't see *why* it
> wouldn't work.
> 
> However, I see one bug it *does* fix: we do not store the SCI penalty
> in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]
> only holds ISA IRQ penalties, and there's no guarantee that the SCI is
> an ISA IRQ.  But prior to this patch, we added in the SCI penalty to
> the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] entry when the SCI was an ISA IRQ, which
> makes acpi_irq_get_penalty() return the wrong thing.  Consider:
> 
>   Initially     acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = 0.
>   Assume        sci_interrupt = 9.
>   Then          acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X.
>   If we call    acpi_penalize_isa_irq(9, 1),
>   it sets       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = X,
>   and now       acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X + X.

Oops, I forgot the penalty we *intended* to add with
acpi_penalize_isa_irq().  It's really like this, where X is the SCI
penalty and Y is the part added by acpi_penalize_isa_irq():

  Initially     acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = 0.
  Assume        sci_interrupt = 9.
  Then          acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X.
  If we call    acpi_penalize_isa_irq(9, 1),
  it sets       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = X + Y,
  and now       acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X + X + Y.

At the end, acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) *should* return X + Y, but instead
it returns X + X + Y, i.e., the SCI penalty is included twice.

[PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 08:39:30PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:02PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
> > 1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
> > 2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
> > active parameter.
> > 3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
> > 4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.
> > 
> > acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
> > before the ACPI subsystem is started.
> > 
> > These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.
> 
> I don't mind this patch, but the changelog doesn't tell me what's
> broken and why we need this fix.  Apparently acpi_irq_get_penalty()
> doesn't work before ACPI is initialized, but I don't see *why* it
> wouldn't work.
> 
> However, I see one bug it *does* fix: we do not store the SCI penalty
> in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]
> only holds ISA IRQ penalties, and there's no guarantee that the SCI is
> an ISA IRQ.  But prior to this patch, we added in the SCI penalty to
> the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] entry when the SCI was an ISA IRQ, which
> makes acpi_irq_get_penalty() return the wrong thing.  Consider:
> 
>   Initially     acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = 0.
>   Assume        sci_interrupt = 9.
>   Then          acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X.
>   If we call    acpi_penalize_isa_irq(9, 1),
>   it sets       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = X,
>   and now       acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X + X.

Oops, I forgot the penalty we *intended* to add with
acpi_penalize_isa_irq().  It's really like this, where X is the SCI
penalty and Y is the part added by acpi_penalize_isa_irq():

  Initially     acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = 0.
  Assume        sci_interrupt = 9.
  Then          acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X.
  If we call    acpi_penalize_isa_irq(9, 1),
  it sets       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[9] = X + Y,
  and now       acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) returns X + X + Y.

At the end, acpi_irq_get_penalty(9) *should* return X + Y, but instead
it returns X + X + Y, i.e., the SCI penalty is included twice.

Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 08:58:14PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:03PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
> > and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.
> > 
> > The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> > refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> > by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
> > reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.
> > 
> > The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
> > ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
> > penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
> > on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.
> > 
> > However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
> > types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
> > leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
> > irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
> > question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
> > penalties are calculated.
> > 
> > To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
> > It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
> > PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
> > otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
> > for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
> > these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
> > one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).
> > 
> > For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
> > penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.
> 
> I like this patch fine, except for the changelog.  I don't think it's
> useful to describe this as a revert and give all the historical
> details.  I think the important part is something like this:
> 
>   We previously used irq_get_trigger_type(irq) to help compute the
>   penalty for the SCI, but that depends on the SCI having been
>   registered already.  Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can
>   tell us the SCI IRQ, trigger, and polarity so we can compute the
>   penalty even before the SCI has been registered.

Thanks for the pointer [1] to the issues around
acpi_penalize_sci_irq() being called before kmalloc() is available.
That begs the question of exactly *why* we need
acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so early -- I doubt we actually need to handle
SCIs that early, and obviously we don't need to look up penalties that
early (because we only look them up when enabling interrupt links,
which happens much later).

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=145580159209240&w=2)

> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Wait a minute, I still have a question here: what about other ACPI
arches (ia64, arm64)?  Don't they need to call acpi_penalize_sci_irq()
somewhere?

> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
> >  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> >  include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
> >  		polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
> >  
> >  	mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> > +	acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > index 4f37938..294b190 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
> >  
> >  static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
> > +static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
> >  
> >  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                              PCI Link Device Management
> > @@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> >  {
> >  	int penalty = 0;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	* Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> > -	* with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> > -	* use for PCI IRQs.
> > -	*/
> > -	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> > -		u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> > -
> > -		if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> > -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> > -		else
> > -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> > -	}
> > +	if (irq == sci_irq)
> > +		penalty += sci_penalty;
> >  
> >  	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> >  		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
> >  
> > -	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> > -	return penalty;
> > +	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> >  }
> >  
> >  int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> > @@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
> >  		    acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> >  }
> >  
> > +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> > +{
> > +	sci_irq = irq;
> > +
> > +	if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
> > +	    polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> > +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> > +	else
> > +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
> >   * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
> >  int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
> >  bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> > +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
> >  void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  
> >  extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 08:58:14PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:03PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
> > and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.
> > 
> > The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> > refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> > by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
> > reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.
> > 
> > The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
> > ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
> > penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
> > on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.
> > 
> > However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
> > types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
> > leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
> > irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
> > question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
> > penalties are calculated.
> > 
> > To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
> > It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
> > PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
> > otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
> > for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
> > these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
> > one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).
> > 
> > For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
> > penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.
> 
> I like this patch fine, except for the changelog.  I don't think it's
> useful to describe this as a revert and give all the historical
> details.  I think the important part is something like this:
> 
>   We previously used irq_get_trigger_type(irq) to help compute the
>   penalty for the SCI, but that depends on the SCI having been
>   registered already.  Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can
>   tell us the SCI IRQ, trigger, and polarity so we can compute the
>   penalty even before the SCI has been registered.

Thanks for the pointer [1] to the issues around
acpi_penalize_sci_irq() being called before kmalloc() is available.
That begs the question of exactly *why* we need
acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so early -- I doubt we actually need to handle
SCIs that early, and obviously we don't need to look up penalties that
early (because we only look them up when enabling interrupt links,
which happens much later).

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=145580159209240&w=2)

> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Wait a minute, I still have a question here: what about other ACPI
arches (ia64, arm64)?  Don't they need to call acpi_penalize_sci_irq()
somewhere?

> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
> >  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> >  include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
> >  		polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
> >  
> >  	mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> > +	acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > index 4f37938..294b190 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
> >  
> >  static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
> > +static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
> >  
> >  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                              PCI Link Device Management
> > @@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> >  {
> >  	int penalty = 0;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	* Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> > -	* with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> > -	* use for PCI IRQs.
> > -	*/
> > -	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> > -		u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> > -
> > -		if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> > -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> > -		else
> > -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> > -	}
> > +	if (irq == sci_irq)
> > +		penalty += sci_penalty;
> >  
> >  	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> >  		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
> >  
> > -	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> > -	return penalty;
> > +	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> >  }
> >  
> >  int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> > @@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
> >  		    acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> >  }
> >  
> > +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> > +{
> > +	sci_irq = irq;
> > +
> > +	if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
> > +	    polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> > +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> > +	else
> > +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
> >   * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
> >  int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
> >  bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> > +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
> >  void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  
> >  extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/21/2016 7:45 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=145580159209240&w=2)
> 
>> > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Wait a minute, I still have a question here: what about other ACPI
> arches (ia64, arm64)?  Don't they need to call acpi_penalize_sci_irq()
> somewhere?
> 

ACPI ARM64 architecture implements reduced ACPI profile which doesn't
have GED object. Instead, ARM64 architecture uses onchip peripherals
for similar functionality. If there is a need to signal interrupts,
this is done by ACPI Notify in ASL or if absolutely needed using
ACPI Generic Event Device (GED).

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/21/2016 7:45 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=145580159209240&w=2)
> 
>> > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Wait a minute, I still have a question here: what about other ACPI
> arches (ia64, arm64)?  Don't they need to call acpi_penalize_sci_irq()
> somewhere?
> 

ACPI ARM64 architecture implements reduced ACPI profile which doesn't
have GED object. Instead, ARM64 architecture uses onchip peripherals
for similar functionality. If there is a need to signal interrupts,
this is done by ACPI Notify in ASL or if absolutely needed using
ACPI Generic Event Device (GED).

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 09:13:06AM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 10/21/2016 7:45 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=145580159209240&w=2)
> > 
> >> > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Wait a minute, I still have a question here: what about other ACPI
> > arches (ia64, arm64)?  Don't they need to call acpi_penalize_sci_irq()
> > somewhere?
> > 
> 
> ACPI ARM64 architecture implements reduced ACPI profile which doesn't
> have GED object. Instead, ARM64 architecture uses onchip peripherals
> for similar functionality. If there is a need to signal interrupts,
> this is done by ACPI Notify in ASL or if absolutely needed using
> ACPI Generic Event Device (GED).

OK.  I guess ia64 never did call acpi_penalize_sci_irq(), so while it
could be added someday to unify things, we don't need to add it now.
Same for arm64.

So I'd like it if you updated the changelog, but I'm OK with the
patch:

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

[PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 09:13:06AM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 10/21/2016 7:45 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=145580159209240&w=2)
> > 
> >> > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Wait a minute, I still have a question here: what about other ACPI
> > arches (ia64, arm64)?  Don't they need to call acpi_penalize_sci_irq()
> > somewhere?
> > 
> 
> ACPI ARM64 architecture implements reduced ACPI profile which doesn't
> have GED object. Instead, ARM64 architecture uses onchip peripherals
> for similar functionality. If there is a need to signal interrupts,
> this is done by ACPI Notify in ASL or if absolutely needed using
> ACPI Generic Event Device (GED).

OK.  I guess ia64 never did call acpi_penalize_sci_irq(), so while it
could be added someday to unify things, we don't need to add it now.
Same for arm64.

So I'd like it if you updated the changelog, but I'm OK with the
patch:

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 08:58:14PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:03PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
> > and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.
> > 
> > The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> > refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> > by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
> > reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.
> > 
> > The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
> > ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
> > penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
> > on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.
> > 
> > However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
> > types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
> > leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
> > irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
> > question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
> > penalties are calculated.
> > 
> > To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
> > It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
> > PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
> > otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
> > for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
> > these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
> > one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).
> > 
> > For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
> > penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.
> 
> I like this patch fine, except for the changelog.  I don't think it's
> useful to describe this as a revert and give all the historical
> details.  I think the important part is something like this:
> 
>   We previously used irq_get_trigger_type(irq) to help compute the
>   penalty for the SCI, but that depends on the SCI having been
>   registered already.  Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can
>   tell us the SCI IRQ, trigger, and polarity so we can compute the
>   penalty even before the SCI has been registered.

I think this is actually the critical patch that fixes the regression
reported by Ondrej, so the changelog really should include details
about the regression, e.g., something like this:

  ACPI: pci_link: Penalize SCI correctly

  Ondrej reported that IRQs stopped working in v4.7 on several
  platforms.  A typical scenario, from Ondrej's VT82C694X/694X, is:

    ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
    ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 1 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15)
    ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA]
    8139too 0000:00:0f.0: PCI INT A: no GSI

  We're using PIC routing, so acpi_irq_balance == 0, and LNKA is already
  active at IRQ 11.  In that case, acpi_pci_link_allocate() only tries
  to use the active IRQ (IRQ 11) which also happens to be the SCI.

  We should penalize the SCI by PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING, but
  irq_get_trigger_type(11) returns something other than
  IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW, so we penalize it by PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
  instead, which makes acpi_pci_link_allocate() assume the IRQ isn't
  available and give up.

  Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can tell us the SCI IRQ,
  trigger, and polarity directly and we don't have to depend on
  irq_get_trigger_type().

  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201609251512.05657.linux@rainbow-software.org
  Reported-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>

I don't understand what's broken about using irq_get_trigger_type().
The SCI is registered in the following path, which is certainly before
we try to enable LNKA for the 8139too device:

  acpi_init                                           # subsys_initcall
    acpi_bus_init
      acpi_enable_subsystem
	acpi_ev_install_xrupt_handlers
	  acpi_ev_install_sci_handler
	    acpi_os_install_interrupt_handler(sci_interrupt, ...)
	      acpi_gsi_to_irq
		acpi_register_gsi
		  irq_create_fwspec_mapping
		    irqd_set_trigger_type

In any event, I think this patch to add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() is
fine.

> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> > Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> > Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> > Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")
> 
> "commit" is redundant; it's sufficient to say:
> 
>   Fixes: 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> 
> In fact, I don't think you really need to include "commit" in the
> reference to 9e5ed6d1fb87 above either.
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
> >  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> >  include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
> >  		polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
> >  
> >  	mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> > +	acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > index 4f37938..294b190 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
> >  
> >  static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
> > +static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
> >  
> >  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                              PCI Link Device Management
> > @@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> >  {
> >  	int penalty = 0;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	* Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> > -	* with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> > -	* use for PCI IRQs.
> > -	*/
> > -	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> > -		u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> > -
> > -		if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> > -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> > -		else
> > -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> > -	}
> > +	if (irq == sci_irq)
> > +		penalty += sci_penalty;
> >  
> >  	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> >  		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
> >  
> > -	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> > -	return penalty;
> > +	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> >  }
> >  
> >  int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> > @@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
> >  		    acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> >  }
> >  
> > +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> > +{
> > +	sci_irq = irq;
> > +
> > +	if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
> > +	    polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> > +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> > +	else
> > +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
> >   * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
> >  int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
> >  bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> > +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
> >  void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  
> >  extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 08:58:14PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:21:03PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
> > and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.
> > 
> > The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> > refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> > by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
> > reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.
> > 
> > The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
> > ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
> > penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
> > on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.
> > 
> > However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
> > types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
> > leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
> > irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
> > question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
> > penalties are calculated.
> > 
> > To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
> > It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
> > PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
> > otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
> > for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
> > these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
> > one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).
> > 
> > For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
> > penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.
> 
> I like this patch fine, except for the changelog.  I don't think it's
> useful to describe this as a revert and give all the historical
> details.  I think the important part is something like this:
> 
>   We previously used irq_get_trigger_type(irq) to help compute the
>   penalty for the SCI, but that depends on the SCI having been
>   registered already.  Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can
>   tell us the SCI IRQ, trigger, and polarity so we can compute the
>   penalty even before the SCI has been registered.

I think this is actually the critical patch that fixes the regression
reported by Ondrej, so the changelog really should include details
about the regression, e.g., something like this:

  ACPI: pci_link: Penalize SCI correctly

  Ondrej reported that IRQs stopped working in v4.7 on several
  platforms.  A typical scenario, from Ondrej's VT82C694X/694X, is:

    ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
    ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 1 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15)
    ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA]
    8139too 0000:00:0f.0: PCI INT A: no GSI

  We're using PIC routing, so acpi_irq_balance == 0, and LNKA is already
  active at IRQ 11.  In that case, acpi_pci_link_allocate() only tries
  to use the active IRQ (IRQ 11) which also happens to be the SCI.

  We should penalize the SCI by PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING, but
  irq_get_trigger_type(11) returns something other than
  IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW, so we penalize it by PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
  instead, which makes acpi_pci_link_allocate() assume the IRQ isn't
  available and give up.

  Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can tell us the SCI IRQ,
  trigger, and polarity directly and we don't have to depend on
  irq_get_trigger_type().

  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201609251512.05657.linux at rainbow-software.org
  Reported-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>

I don't understand what's broken about using irq_get_trigger_type().
The SCI is registered in the following path, which is certainly before
we try to enable LNKA for the 8139too device:

  acpi_init                                           # subsys_initcall
    acpi_bus_init
      acpi_enable_subsystem
	acpi_ev_install_xrupt_handlers
	  acpi_ev_install_sci_handler
	    acpi_os_install_interrupt_handler(sci_interrupt, ...)
	      acpi_gsi_to_irq
		acpi_register_gsi
		  irq_create_fwspec_mapping
		    irqd_set_trigger_type

In any event, I think this patch to add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() is
fine.

> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> > Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> > Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> > Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")
> 
> "commit" is redundant; it's sufficient to say:
> 
>   Fixes: 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> 
> In fact, I don't think you really need to include "commit" in the
> reference to 9e5ed6d1fb87 above either.
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
> >  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> >  include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
> >  		polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
> >  
> >  	mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> > +	acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > index 4f37938..294b190 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
> >  
> >  static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
> > +static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
> >  
> >  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                              PCI Link Device Management
> > @@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> >  {
> >  	int penalty = 0;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	* Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> > -	* with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> > -	* use for PCI IRQs.
> > -	*/
> > -	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> > -		u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> > -
> > -		if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> > -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> > -		else
> > -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> > -	}
> > +	if (irq == sci_irq)
> > +		penalty += sci_penalty;
> >  
> >  	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> >  		return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
> >  
> > -	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> > -	return penalty;
> > +	return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> >  }
> >  
> >  int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> > @@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
> >  		    acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> >  }
> >  
> > +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> > +{
> > +	sci_irq = irq;
> > +
> > +	if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
> > +	    polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> > +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> > +	else
> > +		sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
> >   * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
> >  int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
> >  bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> > +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
> >  void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  
> >  extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 07:58:57PM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 7:31 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> ...
> > And I don't think it fixes a user-visible problem, so it doesn't need
> > to be applied immediately.  I'm not sure this is worth doing by
> > itself; maybe it should wait until we can do more cleanup and think
> > about all these issues together?
> 
> It does fix the PCI_USING penalty assignment. 
> 
>                 if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
>                          penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> 
> 
> If we drop this patch, then we need
> [PATCH V3 1/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts
> 
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2547605
> 
> as somebody needs to increment the penalty with PCI_USING when IRQ is assigned
> for a given ISA IRQ.
> 
> We might as well take [PATCH V4 1/3], [PATCH V4 2/3] and [PATCH V3 1/3]
> for this regression.

It sounds like either V3 1/3 or V4 3/3 will fix the regression.  The
V3 1/3 patch is much smaller and essentially makes this piece look
like it did in v4.6.

The V4 3/3 patch removes acpi_irq_penalty_init() and compensates by
using acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() for ISA IRQs again.  But
acpi_irq_penalty_init() added PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE for _CRS, and
only if there was no _PRS, while acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() always
adds PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING for _CRS, regardless of whether _PRS
exists.

Since V4 3/3 is so much bigger and makes this quite subtle change in
how _CRS is handled, I like V3 1/3 better.

Are we all set to go now?  I think I've acked the patches you
mentioned.

Bjorn

[PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 07:58:57PM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 7:31 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> ...
> > And I don't think it fixes a user-visible problem, so it doesn't need
> > to be applied immediately.  I'm not sure this is worth doing by
> > itself; maybe it should wait until we can do more cleanup and think
> > about all these issues together?
> 
> It does fix the PCI_USING penalty assignment. 
> 
>                 if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
>                          penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> 
> 
> If we drop this patch, then we need
> [PATCH V3 1/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts
> 
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2547605
> 
> as somebody needs to increment the penalty with PCI_USING when IRQ is assigned
> for a given ISA IRQ.
> 
> We might as well take [PATCH V4 1/3], [PATCH V4 2/3] and [PATCH V3 1/3]
> for this regression.

It sounds like either V3 1/3 or V4 3/3 will fix the regression.  The
V3 1/3 patch is much smaller and essentially makes this piece look
like it did in v4.6.

The V4 3/3 patch removes acpi_irq_penalty_init() and compensates by
using acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() for ISA IRQs again.  But
acpi_irq_penalty_init() added PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE for _CRS, and
only if there was no _PRS, while acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() always
adds PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING for _CRS, regardless of whether _PRS
exists.

Since V4 3/3 is so much bigger and makes this quite subtle change in
how _CRS is handled, I like V3 1/3 better.

Are we all set to go now?  I think I've acked the patches you
mentioned.

Bjorn

Re: [V4, 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Jonathan Liu]

On 20 October 2016 at 09:21, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
> 1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
> 2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
> active parameter.
> 3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
> 4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.
>
> acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
> before the ACPI subsystem is started.
>
> These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>                         continue;
>
>                 if (used)
> -                       new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +                       new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>                                         PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
>                 else
>                         new_penalty = 0;
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>  {
>         if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
> -               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>                   (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>  }
>

This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
kernel log:
ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off

Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>

[V4, 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Jonathan Liu]

On 20 October 2016 at 09:21, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
> 1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
> 2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
> active parameter.
> 3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
> 4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.
>
> acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
> before the ACPI subsystem is started.
>
> These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>                         continue;
>
>                 if (used)
> -                       new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +                       new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>                                         PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
>                 else
>                         new_penalty = 0;
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>  {
>         if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
> -               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
>                   (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>  }
>

This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
kernel log:
ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off

Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>

Re: [V4,2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Jonathan Liu]

On 20 October 2016 at 09:21, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
> and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.
>
> The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
> reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.
>
> The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
> ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
> penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
> on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.
>
> However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
> types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
> leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
> irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
> question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
> penalties are calculated.
>
> To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
> It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
> PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
> otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
> for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
> these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
> one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).
>
> For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
> penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.
>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
>                 polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
>
>         mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> +       acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
>
>         /*
>          * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 4f37938..294b190 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
>
>  static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
> +static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
>
>  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                              PCI Link Device Management
> @@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
>  {
>         int penalty = 0;
>
> -       /*
> -       * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> -       * with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> -       * use for PCI IRQs.
> -       */
> -       if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> -               u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> -
> -               if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> -                       penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> -               else
> -                       penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> -       }
> +       if (irq == sci_irq)
> +               penalty += sci_penalty;
>
>         if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
>                 return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
>
> -       penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> -       return penalty;
> +       return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
>  }
>
>  int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> @@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
>                     acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
>  }
>
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> +       sci_irq = irq;
> +
> +       if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
> +           polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> +               sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> +       else
> +               sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
>   * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
>  int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
>  bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
>  void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>
>  extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);

This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
kernel log:
ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off

Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>

[V4,2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Jonathan Liu]

On 20 October 2016 at 09:21, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
> and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in one go.
>
> The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> by the time get_penalty function is called. That change is partially
> reverted here, specifically for the SCI IRQ alone.
>
> The SCI penalize function was finally dropped by commit 9e5ed6d1fb87
> ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") that replaced the old SCI
> penalty API with penalty calculation carried out dynamically and based
> on the acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt value.
>
> However, that new algorithm relies on the accurate setting of IRQ
> types and that doesn't happen early enough on some platforms which
> leads to incorrect penalty assignments for PCI IRQs.  In those cases,
> irq_get_trigger_type() returns incorrect values for the IRQs in
> question, because they have not been registered yet by the time the
> penalties are calculated.
>
> To fix this problem, we only need to fix the penalty for the SCI interrupt.
> It seems better to add a single "sci_penalty" variable, set it to
> PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING if it's level/low or PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
> otherwise, and add "sci_penalty" in when appropriate.  That should fix it
> for *any* SCI IRQ, not just those less than 256, and we don't have to add
> these extra penalty table entries that are all unused (except possibly for
> one entry if we have an SCI in the 16-255 range).
>
> For this reason, revert commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI
> penalize function") completely to restore the correct behavior.
>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
>                 polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
>
>         mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> +       acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
>
>         /*
>          * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 4f37938..294b190 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_link {
>
>  static LIST_HEAD(acpi_link_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_link_lock);
> +static int sci_irq = -1, sci_penalty;
>
>  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                              PCI Link Device Management
> @@ -496,25 +497,13 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
>  {
>         int penalty = 0;
>
> -       /*
> -       * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> -       * with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> -       * use for PCI IRQs.
> -       */
> -       if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> -               u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> -
> -               if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> -                       penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> -               else
> -                       penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> -       }
> +       if (irq == sci_irq)
> +               penalty += sci_penalty;
>
>         if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
>                 return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
>
> -       penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> -       return penalty;
> +       return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
>  }
>
>  int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> @@ -881,6 +870,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
>                     acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
>  }
>
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> +       sci_irq = irq;
> +
> +       if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
> +           polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> +               sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> +       else
> +               sci_penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
>   * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index c5eaf2f..67d1d3e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
>  int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
>  bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
>  void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>
>  extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);

This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
kernel log:
ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off

Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>

Re: [V4,3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Jonathan Liu]

On 20 October 2016 at 09:21, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> This reverts commit f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty
> calculation") and commit 487cf917ed0d ("revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove
> redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()"").
>
> Now that we understand the real issue (SCI and ISA penalty getting
> calculated before ACPI start), there is no need for special handling
> for ISA interrupts.
>
> Let's try to simplify the code one more time to share code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/pci/acpi.c         |  1 -
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 44 +++++---------------------------------------
>  include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |  1 -
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> index 3cd6983..b2a4e2a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
>                 return -ENODEV;
>
>         printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
> -       acpi_irq_penalty_init();
>         pcibios_enable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_enable;
>         pcibios_disable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_disable;
>         x86_init.pci.init_irq = x86_init_noop;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 294b190..dd14d78 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
>                  * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
>                  * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
>                  */
> -               if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
> +               if ((link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq) &&
> +                               (link->irq.initialized == 1))
>                         penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>
>                 /*
> @@ -501,45 +502,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
>                 penalty += sci_penalty;
>
>         if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> -               return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
> +               penalty += acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
>
> -       return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> -}
> -
> -int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> -{
> -       struct acpi_pci_link *link;
> -       int i;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Update penalties to facilitate IRQ balancing.
> -        */
> -       list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
> -
> -               /*
> -                * reflect the possible and active irqs in the penalty table --
> -                * useful for breaking ties.
> -                */
> -               if (link->irq.possible_count) {
> -                       int penalty =
> -                           PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
> -                           link->irq.possible_count;
> -
> -                       for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++) {
> -                               if (link->irq.possible[i] < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> -                                       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.
> -                                                        possible[i]] +=
> -                                           penalty;
> -                       }
> -
> -               } else if (link->irq.active &&
> -                               (link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)) {
> -                       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
> -                           PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE;
> -               }
> -       }
> -
> -       return 0;
> +       penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> +       return penalty;
>  }
>
>  static int acpi_irq_balance = -1;      /* 0: static, 1: balance */
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> index 29c6912..797ae2e 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
>
>  /* ACPI PCI Interrupt Link (pci_link.c) */
>
> -int acpi_irq_penalty_init(void);
>  int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_handle handle, int index, int *triggering,
>                                int *polarity, char **name);
>  int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle handle);

This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
kernel log:
ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off

Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>

[V4,3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Jonathan Liu]

On 20 October 2016 at 09:21, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> This reverts commit f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty
> calculation") and commit 487cf917ed0d ("revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove
> redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()"").
>
> Now that we understand the real issue (SCI and ISA penalty getting
> calculated before ACPI start), there is no need for special handling
> for ISA interrupts.
>
> Let's try to simplify the code one more time to share code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/pci/acpi.c         |  1 -
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 44 +++++---------------------------------------
>  include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |  1 -
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> index 3cd6983..b2a4e2a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
>                 return -ENODEV;
>
>         printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
> -       acpi_irq_penalty_init();
>         pcibios_enable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_enable;
>         pcibios_disable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_disable;
>         x86_init.pci.init_irq = x86_init_noop;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 294b190..dd14d78 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
>                  * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
>                  * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
>                  */
> -               if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
> +               if ((link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq) &&
> +                               (link->irq.initialized == 1))
>                         penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>
>                 /*
> @@ -501,45 +502,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
>                 penalty += sci_penalty;
>
>         if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> -               return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
> +               penalty += acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
>
> -       return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> -}
> -
> -int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> -{
> -       struct acpi_pci_link *link;
> -       int i;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Update penalties to facilitate IRQ balancing.
> -        */
> -       list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
> -
> -               /*
> -                * reflect the possible and active irqs in the penalty table --
> -                * useful for breaking ties.
> -                */
> -               if (link->irq.possible_count) {
> -                       int penalty =
> -                           PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
> -                           link->irq.possible_count;
> -
> -                       for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++) {
> -                               if (link->irq.possible[i] < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> -                                       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.
> -                                                        possible[i]] +=
> -                                           penalty;
> -                       }
> -
> -               } else if (link->irq.active &&
> -                               (link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)) {
> -                       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
> -                           PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE;
> -               }
> -       }
> -
> -       return 0;
> +       penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> +       return penalty;
>  }
>
>  static int acpi_irq_balance = -1;      /* 0: static, 1: balance */
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> index 29c6912..797ae2e 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
>
>  /* ACPI PCI Interrupt Link (pci_link.c) */
>
> -int acpi_irq_penalty_init(void);
>  int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_handle handle, int index, int *triggering,
>                                int *polarity, char **name);
>  int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle handle);

This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
kernel log:
ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off

Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/20/2016 9:39 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.
> I don't mind this patch, but the changelog doesn't tell me what's
> broken and why we need this fix.  Apparently acpi_irq_get_penalty()
> doesn't work before ACPI is initialized, but I don't see *why* it
> wouldn't work.

I'll update the commit message as you suggested. The code doesn't work
if we apply PATCH V4 2/3 + PATCH V4 3/3 without PATCH V4 1/3 since
the caller is going to end up calling get_penalty function while ACPI
is not initialized. This happened during the debug of this regression.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/20/2016 9:39 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.
> I don't mind this patch, but the changelog doesn't tell me what's
> broken and why we need this fix.  Apparently acpi_irq_get_penalty()
> doesn't work before ACPI is initialized, but I don't see *why* it
> wouldn't work.

I'll update the commit message as you suggested. The code doesn't work
if we apply PATCH V4 2/3 + PATCH V4 3/3 without PATCH V4 1/3 since
the caller is going to end up calling get_penalty function while ACPI
is not initialized. This happened during the debug of this regression.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/20/2016 5:39 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>> >  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>> >  {
>> >         if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
>> > -               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
>> > +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
> This looks slightly odd.  What about
> 
> +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +=
> 
>> >                   (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>> >  }

Makes sense.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/20/2016 5:39 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>> >  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>> >  {
>> >         if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
>> > -               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
>> > +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
> This looks slightly odd.  What about
> 
> +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +=
> 
>> >                   (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>> >  }

Makes sense.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/20/2016 5:39 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>> >  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>> >  {
>> >         if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
>> > -               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
>> > +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
> This looks slightly odd.  What about
> 
> +               acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +=
> 
>> >                   (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>> >  }

Makes sense.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/21/2016 12:13 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Wait a minute, I still have a question here: what about other ACPI
>> > arches (ia64, arm64)?  Don't they need to call acpi_penalize_sci_irq()
>> > somewhere?
>> > 
> ACPI ARM64 architecture implements reduced ACPI profile which doesn't
> have GED object.

I actually wanted to mean that ARM64 architecture doesn't have *GPE* object
implemented on ACPI reduced profile.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/21/2016 12:13 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Wait a minute, I still have a question here: what about other ACPI
>> > arches (ia64, arm64)?  Don't they need to call acpi_penalize_sci_irq()
>> > somewhere?
>> > 
> ACPI ARM64 architecture implements reduced ACPI profile which doesn't
> have GED object.

I actually wanted to mean that ARM64 architecture doesn't have *GPE* object
implemented on ACPI reduced profile.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/20/2016 9:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I like this patch fine, except for the changelog.  I don't think it's
> useful to describe this as a revert and give all the historical
> details.  I think the important part is something like this:
> 
>   We previously used irq_get_trigger_type(irq) to help compute the
>   penalty for the SCI, but that depends on the SCI having been
>   registered already.  Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can
>   tell us the SCI IRQ, trigger, and polarity so we can compute the
>   penalty even before the SCI has been registered.

OK, will replace with this and also change the commit summary as

"ACPI,PCI,IRQ: save SCI IRQ details for runtime penalty calculation"
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
>> > Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
>> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>> > Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
>> > Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")
> "commit" is redundant; it's sufficient to say:

OK. I have been fighting with checkpatch. Checkpatch doesn't like a commit
summary without "commit 12 char SHA"
> 
>   Fixes: 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> 
> In fact, I don't think you really need to include "commit" in the
> reference to 9e5ed6d1fb87 above either.
> 


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/20/2016 9:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I like this patch fine, except for the changelog.  I don't think it's
> useful to describe this as a revert and give all the historical
> details.  I think the important part is something like this:
> 
>   We previously used irq_get_trigger_type(irq) to help compute the
>   penalty for the SCI, but that depends on the SCI having been
>   registered already.  Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can
>   tell us the SCI IRQ, trigger, and polarity so we can compute the
>   penalty even before the SCI has been registered.

OK, will replace with this and also change the commit summary as

"ACPI,PCI,IRQ: save SCI IRQ details for runtime penalty calculation"
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
>> > Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
>> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>> > Fixes: commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
>> > Fixes: commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function")
> "commit" is redundant; it's sufficient to say:

OK. I have been fighting with checkpatch. Checkpatch doesn't like a commit
summary without "commit 12 char SHA"
> 
>   Fixes: 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> 
> In fact, I don't think you really need to include "commit" in the
> reference to 9e5ed6d1fb87 above either.
> 


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/22/2016 7:59 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Since V4 3/3 is so much bigger and makes this quite subtle change in
> how _CRS is handled, I like V3 1/3 better.
> 

OK

> Are we all set to go now?  I think I've acked the patches you
> mentioned.

Yes, I'll post a follow up with your recommendations. 

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/22/2016 7:59 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Since V4 3/3 is so much bigger and makes this quite subtle change in
> how _CRS is handled, I like V3 1/3 better.
> 

OK

> Are we all set to go now?  I think I've acked the patches you
> mentioned.

Yes, I'll post a follow up with your recommendations. 

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [V4, 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Sinan Kaya]

Thanks,

On 10/22/2016 11:48 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
> 32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
> adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
> kernel log:
> ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off
> 
> Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>

I'm hoping that you can retest V5 so that Rafael can pull in your tested-by into
the commit message.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[V4, 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Sinan Kaya]

Thanks,

On 10/22/2016 11:48 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
> 32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
> adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
> kernel log:
> ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off
> 
> Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>

I'm hoping that you can retest V5 so that Rafael can pull in your tested-by into
the commit message.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [V4, 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Jonathan Liu]

On 24 October 2016 at 15:17, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> On 10/22/2016 11:48 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>> This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
>> 32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
>> adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
>> kernel log:
>> ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off
>>
>> Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
>
> I'm hoping that you can retest V5 so that Rafael can pull in your tested-by into
> the commit message.
>
> --
> Sinan Kaya
> Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Sure. Please CC me when you submit V5.

Regards,
Jonathan

[V4, 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages

[Jonathan Liu]

On 24 October 2016 at 15:17, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> On 10/22/2016 11:48 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>> This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
>> 32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
>> adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
>> kernel log:
>> ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off
>>
>> Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
>
> I'm hoping that you can retest V5 so that Rafael can pull in your tested-by into
> the commit message.
>
> --
> Sinan Kaya
> Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Sure. Please CC me when you submit V5.

Regards,
Jonathan