From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH] features: declare the Credit2 scheduler as Supported. Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:21:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1477581711.24942.9.camel@citrix.com> References: <147644021476.15715.14173453351089636671.stgit@Palanthas> <6064e22e-5c72-0b5e-dcde-98252d9a1cc2@citrix.com> <1477383532.27407.27.camel@citrix.com> <6ff90896-8434-d970-283a-711fb77f0174@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0338485751490659454==" Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bzmVT-0001B0-Ga for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:22:15 +0000 In-Reply-To: <6ff90896-8434-d970-283a-711fb77f0174@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: George Dunlap , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Lars Kurth , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , Anshul Makkar , Ian Jackson , security@xenproject.org, Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============0338485751490659454== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5Bgoph1DZOafEAiO45oL" --=-5Bgoph1DZOafEAiO45oL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 16:01 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 25/10/16 09:18, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > All this being said, what's the next step? Is there anything more I > > should do, here in this thread? Should we wait for other people to > > weigh in? Should I resend this patch, with a non empty commit > > message? > > Containing what, a summary of this? >=20 > Well I think that in the absence of official rules, we have to make > things up as we go along. >=20 Fine with me. :-) > I think to get this enabled now requires someone to send a patch with > the justification (both from a support/reliability standpoint and > from a > security standpoint) in the commit message.=C2=A0=C2=A0If we get a REST > Maintainer's Ack and no objections, then it should go in (subject to > the > release coodinator, of course). >=20 Ok. > Do you want to send such a patch, or would you prefer it if I tried > to > write something up? >=20 I'd like to give it a try myself. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-5Bgoph1DZOafEAiO45oL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJYEhuPAAoJEBZCeImluHPuSAUQAKUZ+LheCtGIvS9cLkHnvbf+ rYH0aMApJM+Gqp4P3uMQ1mZ+V+3miapTMxC3DJ49Gs3GwA6xk0QFGCsS+I8xdssh uep9Iewlkpesn7d2THQKEanLTmPnVhU0CVnPP262qOFjLRVSBRpCbL1FAG56YHnH FYfyqRAV6LbAK3Xlv2PReTNuguvlt2Qr6S1RdTlGbwZPYgMn6OHfBuvCLYeoCQoR bSajuPt1OMwCHMD/c1E6+TQrns5Wz714pWVmhxeIa/kuy/mV2SnOiVG7rMEoVR5b xgazTgkhJV/EZvurJIj+/ubd1ScsTU4Mvscey+o9O/I0tT+ZW6W26VFapLQ0DHDO S/dpDF9YF5Qq31t4W00RvpQoskyzTP3O3bscMO6+5dLkeDdE54VqtITaV4OATF1Y 7vmX4997CKVW9qQOfyiSE3pv8wflY1eB0APcUiMLeoy5X/z1CwvZcDQEU3TVvMuS BA+YcCdyUF3fWPquUfhLEdj1QH2aiZBAUeb9Te3hwYOWXE9dj5RhQNny3JxaYe6U Oc3fSd55EKkh12OwMaKYf1zmVLQnO0ENmO0Ggc7xWMXJYMCwLPXJnUewJFDOV/cM I5fwf/fny3JBEPDB3H545uniG35qQrc1/pAmDs3zxBpyPBDoIevlhX5WIHyRI27X lwiwnV3E+uhJ52lXQwMS =A+XM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5Bgoph1DZOafEAiO45oL-- --===============0338485751490659454== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLnhlbi5v cmcveGVuLWRldmVsCg== --===============0338485751490659454==--