From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5e: remove napi_hash_del() calls Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 06:20:29 -0800 Message-ID: <1479306029.8455.180.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1479304537.8455.167.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Saeed Mahameed , netdev To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:36098 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752968AbcKPOUb (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:20:31 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f66.google.com with SMTP id x23so14839789pgx.3 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 06:20:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1479304537.8455.167.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 05:55 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > > Calling napi_hash_del() after netif_napi_del() is pointless. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet > Cc: Saeed Mahameed > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) Hmmm... missing body. Will send a v2.