From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Windsor <dave@progbits.org>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:41:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479318060.21171.31.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161116173243.GX3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 803 bytes --]
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 18:32 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:09:16PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 09:23 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > Right, but it's the continuing atomic_t use that concerns me...
> >
> > Can we remove inc_not_zero and dec_and_test functionality
> > from the atomic_t macros?
> >
> > It would require fixing all of the in tree code, and after
> > that people with out of tree code would have to switch to
> > refcount_t to make their code work again.
>
> People will just use (atomic_add_return(-1, &refcount) == 0) instead,
> or
> any other variant along those lines.
They could, but switching the variable type to refcount_t
seems like it would be the way of least resistance.
--
All Rights Reversed.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-10 20:24 [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 01/13] Add architecture independent hardened atomic base Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:41 ` [kernel-hardening] " David Windsor
2016-11-10 21:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 9:06 ` Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 02/13] percpu-refcount: leave atomic counter unprotected Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 03/13] kernel: identify wrapping atomic usage Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 21:58 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 8:49 ` [kernel-hardening] " Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-19 13:28 ` [kernel-hardening] " Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-19 21:39 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-21 20:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 04/13] mm: " Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 05/13] fs: " Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 06/13] net: " Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 07/13] net: atm: " Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 08/13] security: " Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 09/13] drivers: identify wrapping atomic usage (part 1/2) Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 21:48 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Deacon
2016-11-11 8:57 ` [kernel-hardening] " Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-11 12:35 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 10/13] drivers: identify wrapping atomic usage (part 2/2) Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 11/13] x86: identify wrapping atomic usage Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 12/13] x86: implementation for HARDENED_ATOMIC Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:40 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:04 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:32 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 22:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 23:07 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 23:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 9:32 ` [kernel-hardening] " Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-11 10:29 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 18:00 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-11 20:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 9:20 ` [kernel-hardening] " Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 13/13] lkdtm: add tests for atomic over-/underflow Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:37 ` [RFC v4 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 20:37 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 20:48 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-10 20:48 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Deacon
2016-11-10 21:01 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:01 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:23 ` David Windsor
2016-11-10 21:27 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:27 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:39 ` David Windsor
2016-11-10 21:39 ` David Windsor
2016-11-10 21:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:13 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:23 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:23 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-11-11 4:25 ` Rik van Riel
2016-11-10 22:27 ` Greg KH
2016-11-10 23:15 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 23:15 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 23:38 ` Greg KH
2016-11-10 23:38 ` Greg KH
2016-11-11 7:50 ` David Windsor
2016-11-11 17:43 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-11 17:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 18:04 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-11 20:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-14 20:31 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-15 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-15 16:50 ` Rik van Riel
2016-11-15 17:23 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-16 17:09 ` Rik van Riel
2016-11-16 17:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-16 17:41 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2016-11-16 17:34 ` Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-17 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-17 9:04 ` Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-17 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-17 9:36 ` Julia Lawall
2016-11-17 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-17 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-17 11:32 ` Julia Lawall
2016-11-17 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
2016-11-11 18:47 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-11 19:39 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-11 18:31 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-11 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-15 10:36 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-15 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-15 18:02 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-10 23:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 23:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 0:29 ` Colin Vidal
2016-11-11 12:41 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-11 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 14:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-11 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 23:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-13 11:03 ` Greg KH
2016-11-13 11:03 ` Greg KH
2016-11-10 20:56 ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 20:56 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-11-11 3:20 ` David Windsor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1479318060.21171.31.camel@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dave@progbits.org \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.