All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andreslc@google.com, pfeiner@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/8] kvm: x86: mmu: Lockless access tracking for Intel CPUs without EPT A bits.
Date: Tue,  6 Dec 2016 16:46:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481071577-40250-8-git-send-email-junaids@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481071577-40250-1-git-send-email-junaids@google.com>

This change implements lockless access tracking for Intel CPUs without EPT
A bits. This is achieved by marking the PTEs as not-present (but not
completely clearing them) when clear_flush_young() is called after marking
the pages as accessed. When an EPT Violation is generated as a result of
the VM accessing those pages, the PTEs are restored to their original values.

Signed-off-by: Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   3 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h      |   9 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c              | 274 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              |  26 ++--
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |   2 +-
 5 files changed, 237 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 5a10eb7..da1d4b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1056,7 +1056,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
 void kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
 void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask,
-		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask, u64 p_mask);
+		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask, u64 p_mask,
+		u64 acc_track_mask);
 
 void kvm_mmu_reset_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm,
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
index 45ee6d9..9d228a8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
@@ -438,11 +438,14 @@ enum vmcs_field {
 #define VMX_EPT_IPAT_BIT    			(1ull << 6)
 #define VMX_EPT_ACCESS_BIT			(1ull << 8)
 #define VMX_EPT_DIRTY_BIT			(1ull << 9)
+#define VMX_EPT_RWX_MASK                        (VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK |       \
+						 VMX_EPT_WRITABLE_MASK |       \
+						 VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK)
+#define VMX_EPT_MT_MASK				(7ull << VMX_EPT_MT_EPTE_SHIFT)
 
 /* The mask to use to trigger an EPT Misconfiguration in order to track MMIO */
-#define VMX_EPT_MISCONFIG_WX_VALUE           (VMX_EPT_WRITABLE_MASK |       \
-                                              VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK)
-
+#define VMX_EPT_MISCONFIG_WX_VALUE		(VMX_EPT_WRITABLE_MASK |       \
+						 VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK)
 
 #define VMX_EPT_IDENTITY_PAGETABLE_ADDR		0xfffbc000ul
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 3f66fd3..6ba6220 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 #include <linux/srcu.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/kern_levels.h>
 
 #include <asm/page.h>
 #include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
@@ -129,6 +130,10 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
 #define ACC_USER_MASK    PT_USER_MASK
 #define ACC_ALL          (ACC_EXEC_MASK | ACC_WRITE_MASK | ACC_USER_MASK)
 
+/* The mask for the R/X bits in EPT PTEs */
+#define PT64_EPT_READABLE_MASK			0x1ull
+#define PT64_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK		0x4ull
+
 #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
 
 #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
@@ -178,6 +183,25 @@ static u64 __read_mostly shadow_dirty_mask;
 static u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmio_mask;
 static u64 __read_mostly shadow_present_mask;
 
+/*
+ * The mask/value to distinguish a PTE that has been marked not-present for
+ * access tracking purposes.
+ * The mask would be either 0 if access tracking is disabled, or
+ * SPTE_SPECIAL_MASK|VMX_EPT_RWX_MASK if access tracking is enabled.
+ */
+static u64 __read_mostly shadow_acc_track_mask;
+static const u64 shadow_acc_track_value = SPTE_SPECIAL_MASK;
+
+/*
+ * The mask/shift to use for saving the original R/X bits when marking the PTE
+ * as not-present for access tracking purposes. We do not save the W bit as the
+ * PTEs being access tracked also need to be dirty tracked, so the W bit will be
+ * restored only when a write is attempted to the page.
+ */
+static const u64 shadow_acc_track_saved_bits_mask = PT64_EPT_READABLE_MASK |
+						    PT64_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK;
+static const u64 shadow_acc_track_saved_bits_shift = PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT;
+
 static void mmu_spte_set(u64 *sptep, u64 spte);
 static void mmu_free_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
@@ -187,6 +211,12 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask(u64 mmio_mask)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask);
 
+static inline bool is_access_track_spte(u64 spte)
+{
+	return shadow_acc_track_mask != 0 &&
+	       (spte & shadow_acc_track_mask) == shadow_acc_track_value;
+}
+
 /*
  * the low bit of the generation number is always presumed to be zero.
  * This disables mmio caching during memslot updates.  The concept is
@@ -284,7 +314,8 @@ static bool check_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 spte)
 }
 
 void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask,
-		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask, u64 p_mask)
+		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask, u64 p_mask,
+		u64 acc_track_mask)
 {
 	shadow_user_mask = user_mask;
 	shadow_accessed_mask = accessed_mask;
@@ -292,9 +323,23 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask,
 	shadow_nx_mask = nx_mask;
 	shadow_x_mask = x_mask;
 	shadow_present_mask = p_mask;
+	shadow_acc_track_mask = acc_track_mask;
+	WARN_ON(shadow_accessed_mask != 0 && shadow_acc_track_mask != 0);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes);
 
+void kvm_mmu_clear_all_pte_masks(void)
+{
+	shadow_user_mask = 0;
+	shadow_accessed_mask = 0;
+	shadow_dirty_mask = 0;
+	shadow_nx_mask = 0;
+	shadow_x_mask = 0;
+	shadow_mmio_mask = 0;
+	shadow_present_mask = 0;
+	shadow_acc_track_mask = 0;
+}
+
 static int is_cpuid_PSE36(void)
 {
 	return 1;
@@ -307,7 +352,7 @@ static int is_nx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 static int is_shadow_present_pte(u64 pte)
 {
-	return (pte & 0xFFFFFFFFull) && !is_mmio_spte(pte);
+	return (pte != 0) && !is_mmio_spte(pte);
 }
 
 static int is_large_pte(u64 pte)
@@ -490,23 +535,20 @@ static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte)
 	if (spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte))
 		return true;
 
-	if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
-		return false;
-
 	if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte))
 		return false;
 
-	if ((spte & shadow_accessed_mask) &&
-	      (!is_writable_pte(spte) || (spte & shadow_dirty_mask)))
-		return false;
+	if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
+		return is_access_track_spte(spte);
 
-	return true;
+	return (spte & shadow_accessed_mask) == 0 ||
+		(is_writable_pte(spte) && (spte & shadow_dirty_mask) == 0);
 }
 
 static bool is_accessed_spte(u64 spte)
 {
 	return shadow_accessed_mask ? spte & shadow_accessed_mask
-				    : true;
+				    : !is_access_track_spte(spte);
 }
 
 static bool is_dirty_spte(u64 spte)
@@ -650,6 +692,65 @@ static u64 mmu_spte_get_lockless(u64 *sptep)
 	return __get_spte_lockless(sptep);
 }
 
+static u64 mark_spte_for_access_track(u64 spte)
+{
+	if (shadow_accessed_mask != 0)
+		return spte & ~shadow_accessed_mask;
+
+	if (shadow_acc_track_mask == 0 || is_access_track_spte(spte))
+		return spte;
+
+	/*
+	 * Verify that the write-protection that we do below will be fixable
+	 * via the fast page fault path. Currently, that is always the case, at
+	 * least when using EPT (which is when access tracking would be used).
+	 */
+	WARN_ONCE((spte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK) &&
+		  !spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte),
+		  "kvm: Writable SPTE is not locklessly dirty-trackable\n");
+
+	WARN_ONCE(spte & (shadow_acc_track_saved_bits_mask <<
+			  shadow_acc_track_saved_bits_shift),
+		  "kvm: Access Tracking saved bit locations are not zero\n");
+
+	spte |= (spte & shadow_acc_track_saved_bits_mask) <<
+		shadow_acc_track_saved_bits_shift;
+	spte &= ~shadow_acc_track_mask;
+	spte |= shadow_acc_track_value;
+
+	return spte;
+}
+
+/* Returns the Accessed status of the PTE and resets it at the same time. */
+static bool mmu_spte_age(u64 *sptep)
+{
+	u64 spte = mmu_spte_get_lockless(sptep);
+
+	if (spte & shadow_accessed_mask) {
+		clear_bit((ffs(shadow_accessed_mask) - 1),
+			  (unsigned long *)sptep);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	if (shadow_accessed_mask == 0) {
+		if (is_access_track_spte(spte))
+			return false;
+
+		/*
+		 * Capture the dirty status of the page, so that it doesn't get
+		 * lost when the SPTE is marked for access tracking.
+		 */
+		if (is_writable_pte(spte))
+			kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte_to_pfn(spte));
+
+		spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(spte);
+		mmu_spte_update_no_track(sptep, spte);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static void walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	/*
@@ -1434,7 +1535,7 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 restart:
 	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep) {
 		rmap_printk("kvm_set_pte_rmapp: spte %p %llx gfn %llx (%d)\n",
-			     sptep, *sptep, gfn, level);
+			    sptep, *sptep, gfn, level);
 
 		need_flush = 1;
 
@@ -1447,7 +1548,8 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 
 			new_spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
 			new_spte &= ~SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
-			new_spte &= ~shadow_accessed_mask;
+
+			new_spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(new_spte);
 
 			mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(sptep);
 			mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);
@@ -1609,15 +1711,8 @@ static int kvm_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 	struct rmap_iterator uninitialized_var(iter);
 	int young = 0;
 
-	BUG_ON(!shadow_accessed_mask);
-
-	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep) {
-		if (*sptep & shadow_accessed_mask) {
-			young = 1;
-			clear_bit((ffs(shadow_accessed_mask) - 1),
-				 (unsigned long *)sptep);
-		}
-	}
+	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
+		young |= mmu_spte_age(sptep);
 
 	trace_kvm_age_page(gfn, level, slot, young);
 	return young;
@@ -1631,11 +1726,11 @@ static int kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 	struct rmap_iterator iter;
 
 	/*
-	 * If there's no access bit in the secondary pte set by the
-	 * hardware it's up to gup-fast/gup to set the access bit in
-	 * the primary pte or in the page structure.
+	 * If there's no access bit in the secondary pte set by the hardware and
+	 * fast access tracking is also not enabled, it's up to gup-fast/gup to
+	 * set the access bit in the primary pte or in the page structure.
 	 */
-	if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
+	if (!shadow_accessed_mask && !shadow_acc_track_mask)
 		goto out;
 
 	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
@@ -1670,7 +1765,7 @@ int kvm_age_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 	 * This has some overhead, but not as much as the cost of swapping
 	 * out actively used pages or breaking up actively used hugepages.
 	 */
-	if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
+	if (!shadow_accessed_mask && !shadow_acc_track_mask)
 		return kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, start, end, 0,
 					    kvm_unmap_rmapp);
 
@@ -2593,6 +2688,9 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
 		spte |= shadow_dirty_mask;
 	}
 
+	if (speculative)
+		spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(spte);
+
 set_pte:
 	if (mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte))
 		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
@@ -2646,7 +2744,7 @@ static bool mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, unsigned pte_access,
 	pgprintk("%s: setting spte %llx\n", __func__, *sptep);
 	pgprintk("instantiating %s PTE (%s) at %llx (%llx) addr %p\n",
 		 is_large_pte(*sptep)? "2MB" : "4kB",
-		 *sptep & PT_PRESENT_MASK ?"RW":"R", gfn,
+		 *sptep & PT_WRITABLE_MASK ? "RW" : "R", gfn,
 		 *sptep, sptep);
 	if (!was_rmapped && is_large_pte(*sptep))
 		++vcpu->kvm->stat.lpages;
@@ -2879,16 +2977,28 @@ static bool page_fault_can_be_fast(u32 error_code)
 	if (unlikely(error_code & PFERR_RSVD_MASK))
 		return false;
 
-	/*
-	 * #PF can be fast only if the shadow page table is present and it
-	 * is caused by write-protect, that means we just need change the
-	 * W bit of the spte which can be done out of mmu-lock.
-	 */
-	if (!(error_code & PFERR_PRESENT_MASK) ||
-	      !(error_code & PFERR_WRITE_MASK))
+	/* See if the page fault is due to an NX violation */
+	if (unlikely(((error_code & (PFERR_FETCH_MASK | PFERR_PRESENT_MASK))
+		      == (PFERR_FETCH_MASK | PFERR_PRESENT_MASK))))
 		return false;
 
-	return true;
+	/*
+	 * #PF can be fast if:
+	 * 1. The shadow page table entry is not present, which could mean that
+	 *    the fault is potentially caused by access tracking (if enabled).
+	 * 2. The shadow page table entry is present and the fault
+	 *    is caused by write-protect, that means we just need change the W
+	 *    bit of the spte which can be done out of mmu-lock.
+	 *
+	 * However, if access tracking is disabled we know that a non-present
+	 * page must be a genuine page fault where we have to create a new SPTE.
+	 * So, if access tracking is disabled, we return true only for write
+	 * accesses to a present page.
+	 */
+
+	return shadow_acc_track_mask != 0 ||
+	       ((error_code & (PFERR_WRITE_MASK | PFERR_PRESENT_MASK))
+		== (PFERR_WRITE_MASK | PFERR_PRESENT_MASK));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2897,17 +3007,26 @@ static bool page_fault_can_be_fast(u32 error_code)
  */
 static bool
 fast_pf_fix_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
-			u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
+			u64 *sptep, u64 old_spte,
+			bool remove_write_prot, bool remove_acc_track)
 {
 	gfn_t gfn;
+	u64 new_spte = old_spte;
 
 	WARN_ON(!sp->role.direct);
 
-	/*
-	 * The gfn of direct spte is stable since it is calculated
-	 * by sp->gfn.
-	 */
-	gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, sptep - sp->spt);
+	if (remove_acc_track) {
+		u64 saved_bits = (old_spte >> shadow_acc_track_saved_bits_shift)
+				 & shadow_acc_track_saved_bits_mask;
+
+		new_spte &= ~shadow_acc_track_mask;
+		new_spte &= ~(shadow_acc_track_saved_bits_mask <<
+			      shadow_acc_track_saved_bits_shift);
+		new_spte |= saved_bits;
+	}
+
+	if (remove_write_prot)
+		new_spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
 
 	/*
 	 * Theoretically we could also set dirty bit (and flush TLB) here in
@@ -2921,10 +3040,17 @@ fast_pf_fix_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	 *
 	 * Compare with set_spte where instead shadow_dirty_mask is set.
 	 */
-	if (cmpxchg64(sptep, spte, spte | PT_WRITABLE_MASK) != spte)
+	if (cmpxchg64(sptep, old_spte, new_spte) != old_spte)
 		return false;
 
-	kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(vcpu, gfn);
+	if (remove_write_prot) {
+		/*
+		 * The gfn of direct spte is stable since it is
+		 * calculated by sp->gfn.
+		 */
+		gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, sptep - sp->spt);
+		kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(vcpu, gfn);
+	}
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -2955,35 +3081,55 @@ static bool fast_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, int level,
 			break;
 
 	do {
-		/*
-		 * If the mapping has been changed, let the vcpu fault on the
-		 * same address again.
-		 */
-		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte)) {
-			fault_handled = true;
-			break;
-		}
+		bool remove_write_prot = false;
+		bool remove_acc_track;
 
 		sp = page_header(__pa(iterator.sptep));
 		if (!is_last_spte(spte, sp->role.level))
 			break;
 
 		/*
-		 * Check if it is a spurious fault caused by TLB lazily flushed.
+		 * Check whether the memory access that caused the fault would
+		 * still cause it if it were to be performed right now. If not,
+		 * then this is a spurious fault caused by TLB lazily flushed,
+		 * or some other CPU has already fixed the PTE after the
+		 * current CPU took the fault.
 		 *
 		 * Need not check the access of upper level table entries since
 		 * they are always ACC_ALL.
 		 */
-		if (is_writable_pte(spte)) {
-			fault_handled = true;
-			break;
+
+		if (error_code & PFERR_FETCH_MASK) {
+			if ((spte & (shadow_x_mask | shadow_nx_mask))
+			    == shadow_x_mask) {
+				fault_handled = true;
+				break;
+			}
+		} else if (error_code & PFERR_WRITE_MASK) {
+			if (is_writable_pte(spte)) {
+				fault_handled = true;
+				break;
+			}
+
+			/*
+			 * Currently, to simplify the code, write-protection can
+			 * be removed in the fast path only if the SPTE was
+			 * write-protected for dirty-logging.
+			 */
+			remove_write_prot =
+				spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte);
+		} else {
+			/* Fault was on Read access */
+			if (spte & PT_PRESENT_MASK) {
+				fault_handled = true;
+				break;
+			}
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * Currently, to simplify the code, only the spte
-		 * write-protected by dirty-log can be fast fixed.
-		 */
-		if (!spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte))
+		remove_acc_track = is_access_track_spte(spte);
+
+		/* Verify that the fault can be handled in the fast path */
+		if (!remove_acc_track && !remove_write_prot)
 			break;
 
 		/*
@@ -2997,7 +3143,7 @@ static bool fast_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, int level,
 		 *
 		 * See the comments in kvm_arch_commit_memory_region().
 		 */
-		if (sp->role.level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
+		if (sp->role.level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL && remove_write_prot)
 			break;
 
 		/*
@@ -3006,7 +3152,9 @@ static bool fast_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, int level,
 		 * Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt to get more detail.
 		 */
 		fault_handled = fast_pf_fix_direct_spte(vcpu, sp,
-							iterator.sptep, spte);
+							iterator.sptep, spte,
+							remove_write_prot,
+							remove_acc_track);
 		if (fault_handled)
 			break;
 
@@ -5095,6 +5243,8 @@ static void mmu_destroy_caches(void)
 
 int kvm_mmu_module_init(void)
 {
+	kvm_mmu_clear_all_pte_masks();
+
 	pte_list_desc_cache = kmem_cache_create("pte_list_desc",
 					    sizeof(struct pte_list_desc),
 					    0, 0, NULL);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 6a01e755..50fc078 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -6318,6 +6318,19 @@ static void wakeup_handler(void)
 	spin_unlock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, cpu));
 }
 
+void vmx_enable_tdp(void)
+{
+	kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK,
+		enable_ept_ad_bits ? VMX_EPT_ACCESS_BIT : 0ull,
+		enable_ept_ad_bits ? VMX_EPT_DIRTY_BIT : 0ull,
+		0ull, VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK,
+		cpu_has_vmx_ept_execute_only() ? 0ull : VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK,
+		enable_ept_ad_bits ? 0ull : SPTE_SPECIAL_MASK | VMX_EPT_RWX_MASK);
+
+	ept_set_mmio_spte_mask();
+	kvm_enable_tdp();
+}
+
 static __init int hardware_setup(void)
 {
 	int r = -ENOMEM, i, msr;
@@ -6443,16 +6456,9 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
 	/* SELF-IPI */
 	vmx_disable_intercept_msr_x2apic(0x83f, MSR_TYPE_W, true);
 
-	if (enable_ept) {
-		kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK,
-			(enable_ept_ad_bits) ? VMX_EPT_ACCESS_BIT : 0ull,
-			(enable_ept_ad_bits) ? VMX_EPT_DIRTY_BIT : 0ull,
-			0ull, VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK,
-			cpu_has_vmx_ept_execute_only() ?
-				      0ull : VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK);
-		ept_set_mmio_spte_mask();
-		kvm_enable_tdp();
-	} else
+	if (enable_ept)
+		vmx_enable_tdp();
+	else
 		kvm_disable_tdp();
 
 	update_ple_window_actual_max();
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index ec59301..c15418d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5955,7 +5955,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
 
 	kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(PT_USER_MASK, PT_ACCESSED_MASK,
 			PT_DIRTY_MASK, PT64_NX_MASK, 0,
-			PT_PRESENT_MASK);
+			PT_PRESENT_MASK, 0);
 	kvm_timer_init();
 
 	perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);
-- 
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-07  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-27  2:19 [PATCH 0/4] Lockless Access Tracking for Intel CPUs without EPT A bits Junaid Shahid
2016-10-27  2:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] kvm: x86: mmu: Use symbolic constants for EPT Violation Exit Qualifications Junaid Shahid
2016-11-02 18:03   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-02 21:40     ` Junaid Shahid
2016-10-27  2:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm: x86: mmu: Rename spte_is_locklessly_modifiable() Junaid Shahid
2016-10-27  2:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] kvm: x86: mmu: Fast Page Fault path retries Junaid Shahid
2016-10-27  2:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] kvm: x86: mmu: Lockless access tracking for Intel CPUs without EPT A bits Junaid Shahid
2016-11-02 18:01   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-02 21:42     ` Junaid Shahid
2016-11-08 23:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Lockless Access Tracking " Junaid Shahid
2016-11-08 23:00   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] kvm: x86: mmu: Use symbolic constants for EPT Violation Exit Qualifications Junaid Shahid
2016-11-21 13:06     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-08 23:00   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] kvm: x86: mmu: Rename spte_is_locklessly_modifiable() Junaid Shahid
2016-11-21 13:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-08 23:00   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] kvm: x86: mmu: Fast Page Fault path retries Junaid Shahid
2016-11-21 13:13     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-08 23:00   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] kvm: x86: mmu: Lockless access tracking for Intel CPUs without EPT A bits Junaid Shahid
2016-11-21 14:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-24  3:50       ` Junaid Shahid
2016-11-25  9:45         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-29  2:43           ` Junaid Shahid
2016-11-29  8:09             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-30  0:59               ` Junaid Shahid
2016-11-30 11:09                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-01 22:54       ` Junaid Shahid
2016-12-02  8:33         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-05 22:57           ` Junaid Shahid
2016-11-08 23:00   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] kvm: x86: mmu: Update documentation for fast page fault mechanism Junaid Shahid
2016-12-07  0:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Lockless Access Tracking for Intel CPUs without EPT A bits Junaid Shahid
2016-12-07  0:46   ` [PATCH v3 1/8] kvm: x86: mmu: Use symbolic constants for EPT Violation Exit Qualifications Junaid Shahid
2016-12-15  6:50     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-12-15 23:06       ` Junaid Shahid
2016-12-07  0:46   ` [PATCH v3 2/8] kvm: x86: mmu: Rename spte_is_locklessly_modifiable() Junaid Shahid
2016-12-15  6:51     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-12-07  0:46   ` [PATCH v3 3/8] kvm: x86: mmu: Fast Page Fault path retries Junaid Shahid
2016-12-15  7:20     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-12-15 23:36       ` Junaid Shahid
2016-12-16 13:13         ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-12-17  0:36           ` Junaid Shahid
2016-12-07  0:46   ` [PATCH v3 4/8] kvm: x86: mmu: Refactor accessed/dirty checks in mmu_spte_update/clear Junaid Shahid
2016-12-07  0:46   ` [PATCH v3 5/8] kvm: x86: mmu: Introduce a no-tracking version of mmu_spte_update Junaid Shahid
2016-12-07  0:46   ` [PATCH v3 6/8] kvm: x86: mmu: Do not use bit 63 for tracking special SPTEs Junaid Shahid
2016-12-07  0:46   ` Junaid Shahid [this message]
2016-12-14 16:28     ` [PATCH v3 7/8] kvm: x86: mmu: Lockless access tracking for Intel CPUs without EPT A bits Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-14 22:36       ` Junaid Shahid
2016-12-14 23:35         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-16 13:04     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-12-16 15:23       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-17  0:01         ` Junaid Shahid
2016-12-21  9:49         ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-12-21 18:00           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-17  2:04       ` Junaid Shahid
2016-12-17 14:19         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-20  3:36           ` Junaid Shahid
2016-12-20  9:01             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-07  0:46   ` [PATCH v3 8/8] kvm: x86: mmu: Update documentation for fast page fault mechanism Junaid Shahid

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1481071577-40250-8-git-send-email-junaids@google.com \
    --to=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=andreslc@google.com \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfeiner@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.