From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Soft lockup in inet_put_port on 4.6
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:36:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481233016.11849.1@smtp.office365.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481231024.1911284.813071977.72AF4DEE@webmail.messagingengine.com>
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<hannes@stressinduktion.org> wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, at 00:06, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> We are seeing a fair number of machines getting into softlockup in
>> 4.6
>> kernel. As near as I can tell this is happening on the spinlock in
>> bind hash bucket. When inet_csk_get_port exits and does
>> spinunlock_bh
>> the TCP timer runs and we hit lockup in inet_put_port (presumably on
>> same lock). It seems like the locked isn't properly be unlocked
>> somewhere but I don't readily see it.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>
> Likewise we received reports that pretty much look the same on our
> heavily patched kernel. Did you have a chance to investigate or
> reproduce the problem?
>
> I am wondering if you would be able to take a complete thread stack
> dump
> if you can reproduce this to check if one of the user space processes
> is
> looping inside finding a free port?
We can reproduce the problem at will, still trying to run down the
problem. I'll try and find one of the boxes that dumped a core and get
a bt of everybody. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-08 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-06 23:06 Soft lockup in inet_put_port on 4.6 Tom Herbert
2016-12-08 21:03 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-08 21:36 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2016-12-09 0:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-09 1:01 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-10 1:59 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-10 3:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-10 4:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-12 18:05 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-12 18:44 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-12 21:23 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-12 22:24 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-13 20:51 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-13 23:03 ` Craig Gallek
2016-12-13 23:32 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-15 18:53 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-15 22:39 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-15 23:25 ` Craig Gallek
2016-12-16 0:07 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-16 14:54 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-16 15:21 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-16 22:08 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-16 22:18 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-16 22:50 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-17 11:08 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-17 13:26 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-20 1:56 ` David Miller
2016-12-20 2:07 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-20 2:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-20 3:40 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-20 4:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-20 4:59 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1481233016.11849.1@smtp.office365.com \
--to=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.