From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] pwm: lpss: clean up series Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:41:24 +0200 Message-ID: <1481733684.9552.3.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20161024144325.130353-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:48550 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756082AbcLNQlp (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:41:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161024144325.130353-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Mika Westerberg On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 17:43 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There are clean ups and switch to new atomic API (would be considered > as an > improvement). > > The series tested on various Intel platforms, such as Edison and > Minnowboard > MAX. It's already two months and no single comment, no movement somewhere. What should we do to get this pushed? > > And the part I like most is -2 lines statistics! > > Andy Shevchenko (3): >   pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit >   pwm: lpss: Allow duty cycle to be 0 >   pwm: lpss: Switch to new atomic API > > Mika Westerberg (1): >   pwm: lpss: Do not export board infos for different PWM types > >  drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss-pci.c      |  20 +++---- >  drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss-platform.c |  10 ++-- >  drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c          | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- > ----------- >  drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h          |  14 ++--- >  4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy