From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933144AbcLSRr6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:47:58 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:33356 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932252AbcLSRry (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:47:54 -0500 From: Olof Johansson To: mark.rutland@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.or, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: print timer value at init time Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:47:37 -0800 Message-Id: <1482169657-15773-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.0.rc3.29.gb552ff8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is useful to get an indication of how much time we spent in firmware. It's not guaranteed that the timer started at 0 on reset, so it's just an approximation, and might very well be invalid on some systems. But it's still a useful metric to have access to. Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson --- drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c index 02fef68..c26078b 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c @@ -521,6 +521,8 @@ arch_timer_detect_rate(void __iomem *cntbase, struct device_node *np) static void arch_timer_banner(unsigned type) { + unsigned long cnt = arch_timer_read_counter(); + pr_info("Architected %s%s%s timer(s) running at %lu.%02luMHz (%s%s%s).\n", type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER ? "cp15" : "", type == (ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER) ? " and " : "", @@ -534,6 +536,8 @@ static void arch_timer_banner(unsigned type) type & ARCH_MEM_TIMER ? arch_timer_mem_use_virtual ? "virt" : "phys" : ""); + pr_info("Initial timer value: 0x%lx: %ld.%02lds\n", + cnt, cnt/arch_timer_rate, (cnt/(arch_timer_rate/100)) % 100); } u32 arch_timer_get_rate(void) -- 2.8.0.rc3.29.gb552ff8 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:47:37 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: print timer value at init time Message-ID: <1482169657-15773-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org This is useful to get an indication of how much time we spent in firmware. It's not guaranteed that the timer started at 0 on reset, so it's just an approximation, and might very well be invalid on some systems. But it's still a useful metric to have access to. Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson --- drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c index 02fef68..c26078b 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c @@ -521,6 +521,8 @@ arch_timer_detect_rate(void __iomem *cntbase, struct device_node *np) static void arch_timer_banner(unsigned type) { + unsigned long cnt = arch_timer_read_counter(); + pr_info("Architected %s%s%s timer(s) running at %lu.%02luMHz (%s%s%s).\n", type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER ? "cp15" : "", type == (ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER) ? " and " : "", @@ -534,6 +536,8 @@ static void arch_timer_banner(unsigned type) type & ARCH_MEM_TIMER ? arch_timer_mem_use_virtual ? "virt" : "phys" : ""); + pr_info("Initial timer value: 0x%lx: %ld.%02lds\n", + cnt, cnt/arch_timer_rate, (cnt/(arch_timer_rate/100)) % 100); } u32 arch_timer_get_rate(void) -- 2.8.0.rc3.29.gb552ff8