All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: Simulating disk failure with a writeback cache
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:00:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1482181240.24490.9@smtp.office365.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161219205514.dntaogt3vjos37w2@kmo-pixel>

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Kent Overstreet 
<kent.overstreet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:27:34AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>  Oh sorry for some reason I only saw this reply but not your 
>> previous one
>>  about seeing the last version of the file.  Yeah that's kind of 
>> annoying,
>>  I'll make a note to fix the test to do a wipefs before doing the 
>> log replay.
>>  Does using wipefs work as well as dd'ing the first bit of the disk 
>> for you?
>>  Thanks,
> 
> That worked for the short test, but it won't work in general - the 
> issue is that
> in bcache/bcachefs, btree nodes are also log structured, so if we 
> just blow away
> the journal we'll still find btree node entries from the future (and 
> it'll
> complain loudly on finding btree node entries far in the future of 
> the most
> recent journal entry).
> 
> For the bug I'm hunting now I'm gonna see if I can reproduce it with 
> a small
> enough filesystem that I can just dd over the entire device between 
> replays.

Ok that works fine in the short term for you, but ideally you wouldn't 
have to fix the test every time you wanted to run it on bcachefs.  Do 
you have a suggestion of how to make this generic enough to support you 
as well without dd'ing the whole drive?  Thanks,

Josef


  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-19 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-15  2:26 Simulating disk failure with a writeback cache Kent Overstreet
2016-12-15  4:15 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-18 20:12   ` Kent Overstreet
2016-12-18 20:38     ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-18 20:46       ` Kent Overstreet
2016-12-18 21:19         ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-19  2:51           ` Kent Overstreet
2016-12-19  3:07             ` Kent Overstreet
2016-12-19 12:58               ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-19 15:27               ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-19 20:55                 ` Kent Overstreet
2016-12-19 21:00                   ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2016-12-19 21:53                     ` Kent Overstreet
2016-12-20  1:01                       ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-20  1:30                         ` Kent Overstreet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1482181240.24490.9@smtp.office365.com \
    --to=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.