From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751842AbdAVSZd (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:25:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:32924 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751740AbdAVSZX (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:25:23 -0500 Message-ID: <1485109520.4467.82.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [btrfs/rt] lockdep false positive From: Mike Galbraith To: LKML , linux-rt-users Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 19:25:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1485107114.4467.73.camel@gmail.com> References: <1485074793.4467.49.camel@gmail.com> <1485107114.4467.73.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > +> > > /* > +> > > * Allow read-after-read or read-after-write recursion of the > +> > > * same lock class for RT rwlocks. > +> > > */ > +> > > if (read == 3 && (prev->read == 3 || prev->read == 0)) Pff, shoulda left it reader vs reader.. but it's gotta be wrong anyway.