From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751744AbdAVSsU (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:48:20 -0500 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:44662 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751338AbdAVSsP (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:48:15 -0500 Message-ID: <1485110892.2504.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC v3 5/5] tpm2: expose resource manager via a device link /dev/tpms From: James Bottomley To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, open list Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:48:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1485107342.2504.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20170116131215.28930-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20170116131215.28930-6-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <1484751663.2717.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20170119104922.vhgz4rxw6yzdrxqt@intel.com> <1484828380.3140.11.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20170120133914.2wk43nteh2hh7n3c@intel.com> <20170120210522.glx4y4oui36oimld@intel.com> <1485107342.2504.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2017-01-22 at 09:49 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 23:05 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > 'tabrm4' branch has been now rebased. It's now on top of master > > branch that contains Stefan's latest patch (min body length check) > > that I've reviewed and tested. It also contains your updated > > /dev/tpms patch. > > > > I guess the 5 commits that are there now are such that we have > > fairly good consensus, don't we? If so, can I add your reviewed-by > > and tested-by to my commits and vice versa? > > We're still failing my test_transients. This is the full python of > the test case: > > > def test_transients(self): > k = self.open_transients() > self.c.flush_context(k[0]) > self.c.change_auth(self.c.SRK, k[1], None, pwd1) > ... > > It's failing at self.c.flush_context(k[0]) with TPM_RC_VALUE. It's > the same problem Ken complained about: TPM2_FlushContext doesn't have > a declared handle area so we don't translate the handle being sent > down. We have to fix this either by intercepting the flush and > manually translating the context, or by being dangerously clever and > marking flush as a command which takes one handle. This is what the dangerously clever fix looks like. With this and a few other changes, my smoke tests now pass. James --- diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c index f54226d..d5517f1 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c @@ -1053,9 +1053,16 @@ int tpm2_auto_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip) goto out; } - for (i = 0; i < nr_commands; i++) - chip->cc_attrs_tbl[i] = be32_to_cpup( - (u32 *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 9 + 4 * i]); + for (i = 0; i < nr_commands; i++) { + u32 attr = be32_to_cpup((u32 *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + + 9 + 4 * i]); + if ((attr & GENMASK(15,0)) == TPM2_CC_FLUSH_CONTEXT) + /* Warning: dangerous cleverness here. + * Mark flush as taking a handle argument so + * it gets correctly translated */ + attr |= 1 << TPM2_CC_ATTR_CHANDLES; + chip->cc_attrs_tbl[i] = attr; + } chip->nr_commands = nr_commands; tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);