From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753163AbdBCX1F (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 18:27:05 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]:35809 "EHLO mail-pg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752825AbdBCX1E (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 18:27:04 -0500 From: Kees Cook To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Kees Cook , elena.reshetova@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, h.peter.anvin@intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, dwindsor@gmail.com, Hans Liljestrand , dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Subject: [PATCH 0/4] refcount_t followups... Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:26:48 -0800 Message-Id: <1486164412-7338-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, After doing some testing on the new refcount_t series, here are some changes to improve refcount_t for the paranoid case. ;) Since the new LKDTM tests depend on the new API, please add them to your series; it doesn't make sense for it to go through drivers-misc. The first patch (Kconfig fix) could be trivially folded into the initial refcount_t patch, too. Thanks! -Kees From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kees Cook Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:26:48 -0800 Message-Id: <1486164412-7338-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/4] refcount_t followups... To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Kees Cook , elena.reshetova@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, h.peter.anvin@intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, dwindsor@gmail.com, Hans Liljestrand , dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com List-ID: Hi, After doing some testing on the new refcount_t series, here are some changes to improve refcount_t for the paranoid case. ;) Since the new LKDTM tests depend on the new API, please add them to your series; it doesn't make sense for it to go through drivers-misc. The first patch (Kconfig fix) could be trivially folded into the initial refcount_t patch, too. Thanks! -Kees