All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Trivedi <t.vivek@samsung.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: a.sahrawat@samsung.com, pankaj.m@samsung.com,
	Vivek Trivedi <t.vivek@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] fs: avoid iterate_supers to trigger call for sync on filesystem during mount
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 17:27:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486555078-10383-1-git-send-email-t.vivek@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CGME20170208115648epcas5p23f74eab3a9fb73571f233f91625722d6@epcas5p2.samsung.com

It has been observed that apps may block in sys_sync for long time if there
is parallel mount request for large size storage block device in a loaded
environment.

For example, sys_sync is reported to be hunged when a large size disk
(e.g. 4TB/8TB disks) is connected. sys_mount may take time for reading large
amount of metedata - free space accounting by reading bitmap during mount.
The larger the volume, the larger the size of the bitmaps read during mount.

During mount operation s_umount lock is taken by sys_mount. The lock is not
released till the mount is completed. The sync() process keeps on waiting till
s_umount is relased by sys_mount.

Scenario
        Process1                                                Process2
        sys_sync()                                              sys_mount()
        iterate_supers                                          do_mount()
        ...                                                     vfs_kern_mount()
                                                                mount_fs() (Filesystem_mount)
        ...                                                     mount_bdev()
                                                                sget()
                                                                alloc_super()
                                                                down_write_nested(&s->s_umount, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); => LOCK HELD by MOUNT
                                                                ...
        down_read(&sb->s_umount); => WAITING FOR LOCK           ...
        .                                                       ...
        .                                                       fill_super() -> time TAKING (as per filesystem)
        .                                                       up_write(&sb->s_umount); => LOCK RELEASE by mount process
        .
        . STUCKED TILL MOUNT is completed

Since, the superblock gets added to the list during the mount path alloc_super,
so the 'sb' is visible in the s_list. But the behaviour of waiting to sync() a
filesystem which is not active yet, seems ambigous here.

To avoid this issue, may be we should consider about having to check only
the ACTIVE filesystem for doing operations from the superblock list.
'sb' is valid and referencable as long as part of the s_list and MS_ACTIVE is
set after successful mount and cleared during the umount path from
generic_shutdown_super.

---
Fixed a typo and updated the condition in iterate_supers.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Trivedi <t.vivek@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@samsung.com>
---
 fs/super.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index b8b6a08..01711a4 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -587,6 +587,10 @@ void iterate_supers(void (*f)(struct super_block *, void *), void *arg)
 	list_for_each_entry(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) {
 		if (hlist_unhashed(&sb->s_instances))
 			continue;
+
+		if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE))
+			continue;
+
 		sb->s_count++;
 		spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
 
-- 
1.9.1

       reply	other threads:[~2017-02-08 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20170208115648epcas5p23f74eab3a9fb73571f233f91625722d6@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2017-02-08 11:57 ` Vivek Trivedi [this message]
2017-03-09 12:50   ` [PATCH RESEND] fs: avoid iterate_supers to trigger call for sync on filesystem during mount Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1486555078-10383-1-git-send-email-t.vivek@samsung.com \
    --to=t.vivek@samsung.com \
    --cc=a.sahrawat@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.m@samsung.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.