From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com (mail-it0-f50.google.com [209.85.214.50]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7C3731C7 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id x75so9435136itb.0 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:37:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YdRfsL3Xixs7u5IWwX8xMy48U901r7yqbjbAtqVmYFo=; b=DHW4iN3BTY8G7D3yG61zjPFtH3x32M4biduXKcDVHmVibiEORrwk9szTTisBj7foBd 5NMmwWJpJ760RBjwi1AjiqAY+N8oLwLtp1kGQ/xFKFoUNqvk/tXEwLqcaY9yA9+su+QK b+8I8D6cxIdkQ6Va6CiXu6s42xqI07ROrRMuvu9S+2YtiHdtMPL0xIO+KOuSwwQYAe3w GEykBTVJwyR/F6nhaz5sFMd2iFVrJjxYWV2FwtENFm3x2Yk3D6zSoIeOiOB23bKjK7c9 xstjCjOqmxqEu9XVIrPNyfLOvbL0rBCztA7Ppexi+n4JKuzcWeFgOIAY/9dfSJFPimzD uRYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YdRfsL3Xixs7u5IWwX8xMy48U901r7yqbjbAtqVmYFo=; b=VdB8MdzLuWNroAb+2QbPxo+Iup+3dFuPhjNWj6iNUHEDXAicBvGg7glNtixwd1sqmP 8Xom/zRqHFUFp9zSjg1kAsSIPzjJIUVdyugOxr73b4DJwAexfg/iS6vhGAZL0UTrI4Pe 7sWqZmCZWs9uYv8e6/UQ1tU89qeThG3ld7cHx4VNoOo2QQ0cAelVCG5Cyn7eMDsJvQmB CzufX5ZcR0gP6SysgSa25aHv5Fo5uaTAYpBUxSarfCDbzc18vABMCCn4EMllnSJ/70mY GJbii/r+iCzaeSpeaznSHU3dig/4gQLe7ozSGE0iQr+gaVw03N7BsVBDcofZQeoW5+7b mFwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nZgYMATDU3kpjOWApdq4af8PWaKy1KTyYgv6/qZG+BSGQ5dNkOgzDTGlOFcAeIdK7k X-Received: by 10.107.47.195 with SMTP id v64mr21055036iov.85.1487000223961; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:37:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DB6A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.219.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 188sm1870567itm.12.2017.02.13.07.37.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:37:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1487000220.13854.243.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Martin Jansa Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:37:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170213153245.GC3280@jama> References: <1486999455.13854.241.camel@intel.com> <20170213153245.GC3280@jama> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Does recipe specific sysrooot (or whatelse in current oe) break native dependencies? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:37:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 16:32 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 04:24:15PM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 15:36 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > > > > > > I think it's feature which was already there, but almost never > > > triggered (even in test-dependencies.sh tests), but with RSS it fails > > > reliably. > > > > > > > > > See: > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-July/124435.html > > > > That's not quite the same, if I understand it correctly. In that email, > > Richard was talking about "dependencies of that target are not needed > > and not installed" and used "quilt-native" and "compiler/toolchain" as > > example. In other words, if recipe foo DEPENDS on bar for getting foo > > compiled, that dependency on bar gets ignored when installing "foo" into > > the recipe specific sysroot because it shouldn't be needed anymore. > > I'm not sure if it's the same or not, but back then I got very rarely > missing dependency on wayland-native or qtwayland-native, now with RSS I > got 20-30 recipes failing because of missing dependency on > wayland-native, qtwayland-native or qtbase-native to stage the scanner, > moc and other native tools in recipe-sysroot-native. > > And Andreas issues look similar to that. I'm sure Andreas can clarify, but "kdoctools which depends on gettext-native" sounds like a runtime-dependency to me (but I'm just guessing that kdoctools wraps gettext, I don't really know). -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.