From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot0-f179.google.com (mail-ot0-f179.google.com [74.125.82.179]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE2F71A9D for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 73so94752751otj.0 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 06:51:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cyb2mmDQoggy0hGl9GF+kMsrT6y73Cr+mK735i25IT4=; b=rjNBe/JIoUDB/wYHj5WmpyrnYREYegfu6XS89BX24Xwto31TDO0bmU8lrIanJrNeMq jBj8V0YGS4q0Go/QySjhe4qFMBKFbftHc9UpkmnMFVyBn5uOmJjH88FjNR9U4rn/9TXL p2EuOcc8yl0/PDC1tatmMfZ1iqvh74xIHJxwMB8zm3rQcArE2HllHR4MQOfc94YcKwHp ugccFuZP7gbx/UXEN5uvuYs1CG0WH5v6SxZyk23Z50VeH6faJgIDz3R10K2nOsTexaPL 2yp4CXw2TSjhDodcx09euHXgFAJ5t8+Tv9tg21WVrQjiDgSXO1WxeSXYfd2ol7cZ2lfj nc+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cyb2mmDQoggy0hGl9GF+kMsrT6y73Cr+mK735i25IT4=; b=UqQhAx+Vyphf285TahytatSYcHWwHJB98Ke+PNE6jWikZHvjE4ur1rLPAZO6T2KE8i lPM9Vl3pztRlcZNMqGOtPoOUo+wMvMrakr0yELhy9I//+oNYmzQ8FLn7mOM/DfLy9V+9 oAFB7i+hIc20OVUSLYM5Kjlxu6LtkZMbs6XDsDuBYYvpwJ/FqgQJFwJccb74c9W3+Gdm jWCNRGm6VCLa0EH4vTk+JlFieVaU6uQiW4Wmh1edUZkZS/uFWQnjecg/FtJd9N3taAhF IvhIAnA1+VQWUNW382mDJCKKLaEdE/H0onWsWOHb1y1j/ebae6yevqcCLW4xh62vZ7l+ s2Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kcPNwtM3mhjMY+RYmeohO7Uer8MW2rl5tWnTigDsR0fIrHg0ixw7vqFcD0S21Quf7k X-Received: by 10.107.164.147 with SMTP id d19mr27243255ioj.79.1487083879481; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 06:51:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8E015.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.224.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 197sm419738ita.14.2017.02.14.06.51.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 06:51:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1487083875.13854.331.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:51:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: how to select for non-volatile /var/log? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 09:31 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i recall, once upon a time, a discussion of how to best support a > non-volatile /var/log directory: > > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/90151/ A more recent, but also still unmerged patch for this functionality is here: https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/90839/ -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.