From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933002AbdBVPqm (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:46:42 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:54840 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932631AbdBVPqe (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:46:34 -0500 Message-ID: <1487778361.4487.32.camel@gmx.de> Subject: Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration From: Mike Galbraith To: Alex Shi , Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , "rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com" Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:46:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6bf692e9-402f-a076-749b-c2efb77cf95b@linaro.org> References: <1487768197.27533.5.camel@gmx.de> <20170222131218.GS6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <08cafc1b-3e0f-ab48-da45-8ba591379635@linaro.org> <1487775823.4487.23.camel@gmx.de> <6bf692e9-402f-a076-749b-c2efb77cf95b@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qyXzPUZUOSNkrxIdnTWiCX0g4MnwwpeDTFg6D0oxP2G4aZ57MVc JIO7nZ2jF7E4CZL1HD5f82hlqkg7NTYmUIYTotJaMxEol7+58dmeP4luKzAbECpZMO1gKaD dZF9FrnZ4+yMlqBQn0qPmGA2YKL+DjX7LuL8UBtc48lZTKEWgjr/01nFYZZcqIXaMpYx4UG EZfkYkkHLdtfgZXkQdWOg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:n57JjffspOM=:0VR4v2N0gtldwD1ozRFjyl yva0zi3wlBkUKBvZFjhhlDN9hyoR+1S4Ue5FQkQO0N6bmV6S5SMKsrUqXuikGpckye4f9cEAS Q62V0Sh+AY8AdRrInJ7iQjsQtAQK6J9P5cnhO01U7xZ4wJ/h5wrBKroiaBiwHz7VcaB+AbrRO SBoRC/x2Dej+Zn+piz4l9fvm+1JhQxtIBUi+tvofSo9lCk5/apSoWI/Ag3WkxpfVuGCagAo7F +/12j7nySE3GbONa2a6Vr5l0+9OKOpDGQPjsP/ahMlTdFelKP4n89TyjjPClThGY14uYcrqTc rnb+tkldPY0uAeauFZda6l9j/m7FtgTtttJufn/lho4A9V+DKPQtm/8m9SyPjUWLiV/eSLx0d YQ08KBUhbh4+navpYcZf7yus/IfXDsgBCjP9bZql6B1M6DhVmhXmdYDoy6kJAvKfW482PatjH AQqIg2xYYtMqTqmXFZrnaU5zBgH6EK28qEfG5SjAxBh0k1ngo+gAWHRp0BL6PEOV8ylPXnfgx uiPHYD9ALPjpEACrcQJFP2CD43xy4IiEFGodBMAk4oqBNunDjKYuEitI46jNpQTGF/BUgDwVD s7pMVrCwpqcmK77Bwh5FfdIVLWAX27LWKiBSs9+rLZt7glVmeLTxYhi5unzvPzXbxVEbNEubZ Dgako3TZ50M+jOywxvupYnACZ9844+khQH1LgpnX5UeEK9J5UDh4jN82l5gIIHPQaPc/EmAqo VJ69c4Aypp3hf1zhDf8/pnVoZnTTyTi7Rd1BJWyQt4/8Opqyp3NLB5LqxkkilbGoLC1HRSnRy iYEGEXn Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 23:36 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > Sorry. Mike. > What you mean of 'took the zero added cycles option'? :) #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL ... #endif I waved my magic ifdef wand, and poof, they disappeared :) -Mike