From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7348A821CF for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 01:16:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: make iset cookie predictable From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:11:24 -0800 Message-ID: <148835948457.28806.60862861470412098.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <148835947931.28806.15339584183213827869.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <148835947931.28806.15339584183213827869.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-ID: For testing changes to the iset cookie algorithm we need a value that is constant from run-to-run. Stop including dynamic data in the emulated region_offset values. Also, pick values that sort in a different order depending on whether the comparison is a memcmp() of two 8-byte arrays or subtraction of two 64-bit values. Signed-off-by: Dan Williams --- tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c index 45be8b55a663..798f17655433 100644 --- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c +++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 0+1; memdev->region_index = 4+1; memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0]; + memdev->region_offset = 1; memdev->address = 0; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 2; @@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 0+1; memdev->region_index = 5+1; memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0] + SPA0_SIZE/2; + memdev->region_offset = (1 << 8); memdev->address = 0; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 2; @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 1+1; memdev->region_index = 4+1; memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1]; + memdev->region_offset = (1 << 16); memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 4; @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 1+1; memdev->region_index = 5+1; memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + SPA1_SIZE/4; + memdev->region_offset = (1 << 24); memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 4; @@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 1+1; memdev->region_index = 6+1; memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 2*SPA1_SIZE/4; + memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 32); memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 4; @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 1+1; memdev->region_index = 7+1; memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 3*SPA1_SIZE/4; + memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 40); memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 4; @@ -1380,7 +1380,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 11+1; memdev->region_index = 9+1; memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[2]; + memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 48); memdev->address = 0; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 1; _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Williams Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: make iset cookie predictable Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:11:24 -0800 Message-ID: <148835948457.28806.60862861470412098.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <148835947931.28806.15339584183213827869.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <148835947931.28806.15339584183213827869.stgit-p8uTFz9XbKj2zm6wflaqv1nYeNYlB/vhral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org For testing changes to the iset cookie algorithm we need a value that is constant from run-to-run. Stop including dynamic data in the emulated region_offset values. Also, pick values that sort in a different order depending on whether the comparison is a memcmp() of two 8-byte arrays or subtraction of two 64-bit values. Signed-off-by: Dan Williams --- tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c index 45be8b55a663..798f17655433 100644 --- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c +++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 0+1; memdev->region_index = 4+1; memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0]; + memdev->region_offset = 1; memdev->address = 0; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 2; @@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 0+1; memdev->region_index = 5+1; memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0] + SPA0_SIZE/2; + memdev->region_offset = (1 << 8); memdev->address = 0; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 2; @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 1+1; memdev->region_index = 4+1; memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1]; + memdev->region_offset = (1 << 16); memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 4; @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 1+1; memdev->region_index = 5+1; memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + SPA1_SIZE/4; + memdev->region_offset = (1 << 24); memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 4; @@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 1+1; memdev->region_index = 6+1; memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 2*SPA1_SIZE/4; + memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 32); memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 4; @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 1+1; memdev->region_index = 7+1; memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 3*SPA1_SIZE/4; + memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 40); memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 4; @@ -1380,7 +1380,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t) memdev->range_index = 11+1; memdev->region_index = 9+1; memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE; - memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[2]; + memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 48); memdev->address = 0; memdev->interleave_index = 0; memdev->interleave_ways = 1;