On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 15:34 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 13:55 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 28/02/17 11:52, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > +static inline bool_t same_node(unsigned int cpua, unsigned int
> > > cpub)
> > 
> > s/bool_t/bool/g
> > 
> Oh.. Yes, you're right. Sorry!
> 
Actually, I don't feel comfortable doing this either, not in this
patch, at least. This patch purely about code motion, and I want it to
stay that way.

What I can and will do, is to prepare a separate patch sanitizing
bool_t-s.

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)