All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:04:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489143891-11596-9-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489143891-11596-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>

Currently we have functions to request/free all IRQs for a given PMU.
While this works today, this won't work for ACPI, where we don't know
the full set of IRQs up front, and need to request them separately.

To enable supporting ACPI, this patch splits out the cpu-local
request/free into new functions, allowing us to request/free individual
IRQs.

As this makes it possible/necessary to request a PPI once per cpu, an
additional check is added to detect mismatched PPIs. This shouldn't
matter for the DT / platform case, as we check this when parsing.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index a39cf55..5e5ea12 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -527,65 +527,81 @@ int perf_num_counters(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_num_counters);
 
-static void armpmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+static void armpmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int cpu)
 {
-	int cpu;
 	struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = armpmu->hw_events;
+	int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
 
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
-		int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
-		if (!irq)
-			continue;
+	if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs))
+		return;
 
-		if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
-			free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
-			break;
-		}
+	if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+		free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
+		cpumask_clear(&armpmu->active_irqs);
+		return;
+	}
 
-		if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs))
-			continue;
+	free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
+}
 
-		free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
-	}
+static void armpmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus)
+		armpmu_free_irq(armpmu, cpu);
 }
 
-static int armpmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+static int armpmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int cpu)
 {
-	int cpu, err;
+	int err = 0;
 	struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = armpmu->hw_events;
 	const irq_handler_t handler = armpmu_dispatch_irq;
+	int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
+	if (!irq)
+		return 0;
 
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
-		int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
-		if (!irq)
-			continue;
+	if (irq_is_percpu(irq) && cpumask_empty(&armpmu->active_irqs)) {
+		err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
+					 &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
+	} else if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+		int other_cpu = cpumask_first(&armpmu->active_irqs);
+		int other_irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, other_cpu);
 
-		if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
-			err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
-						 &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
-			if (err) {
-				pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
-					irq);
-			}
-
-			return err;
+		if (irq != other_irq) {
+			pr_warn("mismatched PPIs detected.\n");
+			err = -EINVAL;
 		}
-
+	} else {
 		err = request_irq(irq, handler,
 				  IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_NO_THREAD, "arm-pmu",
 				  per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
-		if (err) {
-			pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
-				irq);
-			return err;
-		}
+	}
 
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
+			irq);
+		return err;
 	}
 
+	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int armpmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+{
+	int cpu, err;
+
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
+		err = armpmu_request_irq(armpmu, cpu);
+		if (err)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 int armpmu_get_cpu_irq(struct arm_pmu *pmu, int cpu)
 {
 	struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-10 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-10 11:04 [PATCH 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 01/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 02/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: define armpmu_init_fn Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 03/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: fold init into alloc Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 04/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: factor out pmu registration Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 05/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: simplify cpu_pmu_request_irqs() Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 06/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: handle no platform_device Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 07/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 09/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 10/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split out platform device probe logic Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 11/14] arm64: add function to get a cpu's MADT GICC table Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 18:33   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 12/14] arm64: kill acpi_set_mailbox_entry() Mark Rutland
2017-03-21 18:00   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-21 18:15     ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-21 18:37       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-21 18:53         ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-22 11:38           ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 13/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 14/14] arm64: pmuv3: use arm_pmu " Mark Rutland
2017-03-14  6:00   ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-03-14 10:51     ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-14 12:12       ` Jayachandran C.
2017-03-17 10:24       ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-12  2:40       ` Hanjun Guo
2017-03-10 22:14 ` [PATCH 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Jeremy Linton
2017-03-14 11:49   ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-14 18:47     ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-14 22:06       ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-03-15  2:49         ` Hanjun Guo
2017-03-22 12:19       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-22 14:06         ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-03-22 23:23         ` Hanjun Guo
2017-03-15 15:34   ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-16 13:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-03-20 18:11   ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-03-22  9:16     ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-03-22 15:59       ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-03 10:41       ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-03 11:12         ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  9:32     ` Hanjun Guo
2017-03-24 21:36 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-03-28 11:31   ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-28 14:41     ` Jeremy Linton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1489143891-11596-9-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.