From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06AF72FF0 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id l7so20020081ioe.3 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 06:41:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sQdArRyBjeCllvT67yf8WyBbMum8p98YKqY8u225rEU=; b=UUaB71AgNQg2tBAL4EALfs0wXG/zSj2nWFCYTM8Iwh8abjlEIiuEJckmql6GPWjyGD DFi+cqopJfIN2wc28XKl5830iL9nGEFp4JyhU5uoqZ1pbMnjm2qSrpZGsCGIM5nwWPeZ D+geQLbU6F6hOzSQxernyI6LZRNscqOE6pskxh8BB9+cpg6eztRjV1Ir1ZtfSE8ewW9W E5u4fplgjUVqQuFhE4BRVybWWZeibnBYT0O9Ld5dmf1rBzwdXod+JQ94mUBD2SsGLvJe hXOIxq0RcnXDEdpcBtg8Sms66NHg+eij3TRELBXdH0/bYLgRBH9dlg+nMIH5zA2qF6xN zH+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sQdArRyBjeCllvT67yf8WyBbMum8p98YKqY8u225rEU=; b=Qpq2MysY53NVPd3TBE/1rdhepOilFvKilhLkD5stCX/VAdJ8LUGgfbXIF4xcOPQmd9 +rSlt105jAwIFAa+pf8woBafakYhMH7bKjAqoVWvWkn1dHEF6PlycTD3I5bBnIVrDbPS ZkXapuQiXo7Wg2hGOxqrgl2d0xD94qzmVJCfMwvM+zzTYplHaNpdbotK4Ac7iFf8Aaxw F9eQ9A4oZFIlhgVtscf8rkmLSKFunuoNn0IGbKwFPDvm4kElNYX2jBo62A9FY/1V82Jl Ftdz9K73wVsBsvS7XeZck0YZwuVZzfkZoG61sdXpkxhwoTfyW6C/J9IBysS/MOTEBpYi dXlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3ny/jEAmo2FWsYf4FCRZmmZ4QFRjSqJEVniv96djNnr/w1p6RHVvsAd7FBpqDdxK6g X-Received: by 10.107.133.86 with SMTP id h83mr5100604iod.230.1489585300274; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 06:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DCEB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.220.235]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y203sm1510777iod.11.2017.03.15.06.41.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 06:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1489585294.6396.104.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:41:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1489585158.6396.102.camel@intel.com> References: <2791e915-9e22-a01a-ccb5-c629d250edb2@phytec.de> <20170308105729.GA22401@linux.intel.com> <7d4a770f-25c6-5747-5a5c-370c822f2efb@mlbassoc.com> <20170308134349.GA16099@linux.intel.com> <20170314171147.GA28498@linux.intel.com> <1489513785.6396.83.camel@intel.com> <20170314180644.GA22000@linux.intel.com> <1489562674.6396.89.camel@intel.com> <20170315125810.GA28986@linux.intel.com> <1489585158.6396.102.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Gary Thomas , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Create more than one image with WIC X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:41:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:39 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:58 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote: > > Regarding do_rm_work. It should not touch rootfs directories, I believe. > > It does, and it should by default because a rootfs can be quite large. > If it's not going to be reused in another recipe, then it is worthwhile > to remove it. I should add that RM_WORK_EXCLUDE_ITEMS += "rootfs" can be used in image recipes which know that their rootfs is going to be needed elsewhere - it's just not the default. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.