From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Revert "i2c: mux: pca954x: Add ACPI support for pca954x" Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:47:18 +0300 Message-ID: <1490532438.708.10.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20170321191310.32957-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <01b7c79e-c52f-8e87-59a8-2eb17a72d733@axentia.se> <1490187942.19767.161.camel@linux.intel.com> <7d5fba14-d3f1-dfaa-ac7d-5001ccf370a1@axentia.se> <20170323100403.GA9307@amd> <1490271392.19767.186.camel@linux.intel.com> <077d184d-1af5-fcdb-59c9-ff3255906be0@axentia.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:59613 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751309AbdCZMrY (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2017 08:47:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <077d184d-1af5-fcdb-59c9-ff3255906be0@axentia.se> Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Rosin , Pavel Machek Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , Tin Huynh , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 11:21 +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-03-23 13:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 12:21 +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: > > > So, I'm still seeking guidance on how to handle these two patches. > > > > I have no strong opinion, but IDs might collide in the future if > > PCAxxxx > > will be assigned to something else and the patch will go stable@ > > (yeah, > > OTOH it's quite unlikely). > > > > So, we may postpone any stable@ back porting up to some real issue > > appears. Regarding second one, it's not important at all (could be > > even > > dropped). Consider it as example how to use _DSD and PRP0001 in ACPI > > case for DT-enabled drivers. > > Ok, I have added 1/2 to my i2c-mux for-current branch and will drop > 2/2 unless someone pipes up. Fair enough. Thanks! -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy