From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43145 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934033AbdC3U6P (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:58:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1490907435.11920.11.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] usb: document that URB transfer_buffer should be aligned From: Oliver Neukum To: Alan Stern , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: David Mosberger , Jaejoong Kim , Laurent Pinchart , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , GregKroah-Hartman , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jonathan Corbet , Wolfram Sang , John Youn , Roger Quadros , Linux Doc MailingList , Linux Media Mailing List , USB list Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:57:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Donnerstag, den 30.03.2017, 11:55 -0400 schrieb Alan Stern: > > I'm pretty sure that usb-storage does not do this, at least, not when > operating in its normal Bulk-Only-Transport mode.  It never tries to > read the results of an earlier transfer after carrying out a later > transfer to any part of the same buffer. The storage driver takes buffers as the block layer (or sg) provide them, does it not? Regards Oliver