All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com,
	he.chen@linux.intel.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com,
	Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
	mengxu@cis.upenn.edu, jbeulich@suse.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: [PATCH v10 17/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement set value callback functions.
Date: Sat,  1 Apr 2017 21:53:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491054836-30488-18-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491054836-30488-1-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>

This patch implements L3 CDP set value related callback functions.

With this patch, 'psr-cat-cbm-set' command can work for L3 CDP.

Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
---
v10:
    - remove 'l3_cdp_get_old_val' and use 'l3_cdp_get_val' to replace it.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - remove 'l3_cdp_set_new_val'.
    - modify 'insert_val_to_array' flow to handle multiple COSs case.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - remove 'l3_cdp_compare_val' and implement a generic function
      'comapre_val'.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - remove 'l3_cdp_fits_cos_max'.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - introduce macro 'PSR_MAX_COS_NUM'.
    - introduce a new member in 'feat_props', 'type[PSR_MAX_COS_NUM]' to record
      all 'cbm_type' the feature has.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - modify 'gather_val_array' flow to handle multiple COSs case.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - modify 'find_cos' flow and implement 'compare_val' to handle multiple
      COSs case.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - modify 'fits_cos_max' flow to handle multiple COSs case.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - changes about 'props'.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - remove cast in 'l3_cdp_write_msr'.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - implement 'compare_val' function to compare if feature values are what
      we expect in finding flow.
    - implement 'restore_default_val' function to restore feature's COS values
      to default if the feature has multiple COSs. It is called when the COS
      ID is reduced to 0.
v9:
    - add comment to explain why CDP uses 2 COSs.
      (suggested by Wei Liu)
    - use 'cat_default_val'.
      (suggested by Wei Liu)
    - remove 'l3_cdp_get_cos_num' because we can directly get cos_num from
      feat_node now.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - remove cos checking because it has been moved to common function.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - l3_cdp_set_new_val parameter 'm' is changed to 'new_val'.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - directly use get_cdp_data(feat, 0) and get_cdp_code(feat, 0) to get
      default value.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - modify 'l3_cdp_write_msr' flow to write value into register according
      to input type.
    - changes about 'uint64_t' to 'uint32_t'.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
v8:
    - modify 'l3_cdp_write_msr' type to 'void'.
v5:
    - remove type check in callback function.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - modify return value of callback functions because we do not need them
      to return number of entries the feature uses. In caller, we call
      'get_cos_num' to get the number of entries the feature uses.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - remove 'l3_cdp_get_cos_max_from_type'.
    - rename 'l3_cdp_exceeds_cos_max' to 'l3_cdp_fits_cos_max'.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
v4:
    - create this patch to make codes easier to understand.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
---
 xen/arch/x86/psr.c | 226 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 183 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
index aced012..bfa1777 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
@@ -51,6 +51,14 @@
 
 #define PSR_ASSOC_REG_SHIFT 32
 
+/*
+ * Every PSR feature uses some COS registers for each COS ID, e.g. CDP uses 2
+ * COS registers (DATA and CODE) for one COS ID, but CAT uses 1 COS register.
+ * We use below macro as the max number of COS registers used by all features.
+ * So far, it is 2 which means CDP's COS registers number.
+ */
+#define PSR_MAX_COS_NUM 2
+
 enum psr_feat_type {
     PSR_SOCKET_L3_CAT,
     PSR_SOCKET_L3_CDP,
@@ -94,6 +102,13 @@ struct feat_node {
         unsigned int cos_max;
         unsigned int cbm_len;
 
+        /*
+         * An array to save all 'enum cbm_type' values of the feature. It is
+         * used with cos_num together to get/write a feature's COS registers
+         * values one by one.
+         */
+        enum cbm_type type[PSR_MAX_COS_NUM];
+
         /* get_feat_info is used to get feature HW info. */
         bool (*get_feat_info)(const struct feat_node *feat,
                               uint32_t data[], unsigned int array_len);
@@ -104,7 +119,7 @@ struct feat_node {
 
         /* write_msr is used to write out feature MSR register. */
         void (*write_msr)(unsigned int cos, uint32_t val,
-                          struct feat_node *feat);
+                          enum cbm_type type, struct feat_node *feat);
     } *props;
 
     uint32_t cos_reg_val[MAX_COS_REG_CNT];
@@ -292,6 +307,8 @@ static void cat_init_feature(const struct cpuid_leaf *regs,
         /* cos=0 is reserved as default cbm(all bits within cbm_len are 1). */
         feat->cos_reg_val[0] = cat_default_val(feat->props->cbm_len);
 
+        feat->props->type[0] = PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3;
+
         /*
          * To handle cpu offline and then online case, we need restore MSRs to
          * default values.
@@ -320,6 +337,9 @@ static void cat_init_feature(const struct cpuid_leaf *regs,
         get_cdp_code(feat, 0) = cat_default_val(feat->props->cbm_len);
         get_cdp_data(feat, 0) = cat_default_val(feat->props->cbm_len);
 
+        feat->props->type[0] = PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA;
+        feat->props->type[1] = PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_CODE;
+
         /*
          * To handle cpu offline and then online case, we need restore MSRs to
          * default values.
@@ -373,7 +393,7 @@ static void cat_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos,
 
 /* L3 CAT ops */
 static void l3_cat_write_msr(unsigned int cos, uint32_t val,
-                             struct feat_node *feat)
+                             enum cbm_type type, struct feat_node *feat)
 {
     if ( feat->cos_reg_val[cos] != val )
     {
@@ -410,10 +430,28 @@ static void l3_cdp_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos,
         *val = get_cdp_code(feat, cos);
 }
 
+static void l3_cdp_write_msr(unsigned int cos, uint32_t val,
+                             enum cbm_type type, struct feat_node *feat)
+{
+    /* Data */
+    if ( type == PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA && get_cdp_data(feat, cos) != val )
+    {
+        get_cdp_data(feat, cos) = val;
+        wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PSR_L3_MASK_DATA(cos), val);
+    }
+    /* Code */
+    if ( type == PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_CODE && get_cdp_code(feat, cos) != val )
+    {
+        get_cdp_code(feat, cos) = val;
+        wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PSR_L3_MASK_CODE(cos), val);
+    }
+}
+
 static struct feat_props l3_cdp_props = {
     .cos_num = 2,
     .get_feat_info = l3_cdp_get_feat_info,
     .get_val = l3_cdp_get_val,
+    .write_msr = l3_cdp_write_msr,
 };
 
 static void __init parse_psr_bool(char *s, char *value, char *feature,
@@ -741,7 +779,7 @@ static int gather_val_array(uint32_t val[],
                             const struct psr_socket_info *info,
                             unsigned int old_cos)
 {
-    unsigned int i;
+    unsigned int i, j;
 
     if ( !val )
         return -EINVAL;
@@ -764,8 +802,13 @@ static int gather_val_array(uint32_t val[],
         if ( cos > feat->props->cos_max )
             cos = 0;
 
-        /* Value getting order is same as feature array. */
-        feat->props->get_val(feat, cos, 0, &val[0]);
+        /*
+         * Value getting order is same as feature array.
+         * For CDP, it has two COS values to get. We get them in this order:
+         * DATA is first, CODE is second.
+         */
+        for ( j = 0; j < feat->props->cos_num; j++ )
+            feat->props->get_val(feat, cos, feat->props->type[j], &val[j]);
 
         array_len -= feat->props->cos_num;
 
@@ -812,12 +855,66 @@ static int insert_val_to_array(uint32_t val[],
     if ( !psr_check_cbm(feat->props->cbm_len, new_val) )
         return -EINVAL;
 
-    /* Value setting position is same as feature array. */
-    val[0] = new_val;
+    /*
+     * Value setting position is same as feature array.
+     * Different features may have different setting behaviors, e.g. CDP
+     * has two values (DATA/CODE) which need us to save input value to
+     * different position in the array according to type.
+     */
+    for ( i = 0; i < feat->props->cos_num; i++ )
+    {
+        if ( type == feat->props->type[i] )
+            val[i] = new_val;
+    }
 
     return 0;
 }
 
+static int compare_val(const uint32_t val[],
+                       const struct feat_node *feat,
+                       unsigned int cos)
+{
+    int rc = 0;
+    unsigned int i;
+
+    for ( i = 0; i < feat->props->cos_num; i++ )
+    {
+        uint32_t feat_val = 0;
+
+        rc = 0;
+
+        /* If cos is bigger than cos_max, we need compare default value. */
+        if ( cos > feat->props->cos_max )
+        {
+            /*
+             * COS ID 0 always stores the default value so input 0 to get
+             * default value.
+             */
+            feat->props->get_val(feat, 0, feat->props->type[i], &feat_val);
+
+            /*
+             * If cos is bigger than feature's cos_max, the val should be
+             * default value. Otherwise, it fails to find a COS ID. So we
+             * have to exit find flow.
+             */
+            if ( val[i] != feat_val )
+                return -EINVAL;
+
+            rc = 1;
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        /* For CDP, DATA is the first item in val[], CODE is the second. */
+        feat->props->get_val(feat, cos, feat->props->type[i], &feat_val);
+        if ( val[i] != feat_val )
+            break;
+
+        rc = 1;
+    }
+
+    return rc;
+}
+
 static int find_cos(const uint32_t val[], unsigned int array_len,
                     enum psr_feat_type feat_type,
                     const struct psr_socket_info *info,
@@ -840,7 +937,7 @@ static int find_cos(const uint32_t val[], unsigned int array_len,
     for ( cos = 0; cos <= cos_max; cos++ )
     {
         const uint32_t *val_ptr = val;
-        bool found = false;
+        int rc = 0;
 
         if ( cos && !ref[cos] )
             continue;
@@ -851,43 +948,21 @@ static int find_cos(const uint32_t val[], unsigned int array_len,
          */
         for ( i = 0; i < PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT; i++ )
         {
-            uint32_t default_val = 0;
-
             feat = info->features[i];
             if ( !feat )
                 continue;
 
             /*
-             * COS ID 0 always stores the default value so input 0 to get
-             * default value.
-             */
-            feat->props->get_val(feat, 0, 0, &default_val);
-
-            /*
              * Compare value according to feature array order.
              * We must follow this order because value array is assembled
              * as this order.
              */
-            if ( cos > feat->props->cos_max )
-            {
-                /*
-                 * If cos is bigger than feature's cos_max, the val should be
-                 * default value. Otherwise, it fails to find a COS ID. So we
-                 * have to exit find flow.
-                 */
-                if ( val[0] != default_val )
-                    return -EINVAL;
-
-                found = true;
-            }
-            else
-            {
-                if ( val[0] == feat->cos_reg_val[cos] )
-                    found = true;
-            }
+            rc = compare_val(val, feat, cos);
+            if ( rc < 0 )
+                return rc;
 
             /* If fail to match, go to next cos to compare. */
-            if ( !found )
+            if ( !rc )
                 break;
 
             val_ptr += feat->props->cos_num;
@@ -896,7 +971,7 @@ static int find_cos(const uint32_t val[], unsigned int array_len,
         }
 
         /* For this COS ID all entries in the values array do match. Use it. */
-        if ( found )
+        if ( rc )
             return cos;
     }
 
@@ -908,7 +983,7 @@ static bool fits_cos_max(const uint32_t val[],
                          const struct psr_socket_info *info,
                          unsigned int cos)
 {
-    unsigned int i;
+    unsigned int i, j;
 
     for ( i = 0; i < PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT; i++ )
     {
@@ -922,9 +997,14 @@ static bool fits_cos_max(const uint32_t val[],
 
         if ( cos > feat->props->cos_max )
         {
-            feat->props->get_val(feat, 0, 0, &default_val);
-            if ( val[0] != default_val )
-                return false;
+            /* For CDP, DATA is the first item in val[], CODE is the second. */
+            for ( j = 0; j < feat->props->cos_num; j++ )
+            {
+                feat->props->get_val(feat, 0, feat->props->type[j],
+                                     &default_val);
+                if ( val[j] != default_val )
+                    return false;
+            }
         }
 
         array_len -= feat->props->cos_num;
@@ -994,6 +1074,7 @@ struct cos_write_info
     unsigned int cos;
     struct feat_node *feature;
     uint32_t val;
+    enum cbm_type type;
 };
 
 static void do_write_psr_msr(void *data)
@@ -1005,11 +1086,12 @@ static void do_write_psr_msr(void *data)
     if ( cos > feat->props->cos_max )
         return;
 
-    feat->props->write_msr(cos, info->val, feat);
+    feat->props->write_msr(cos, info->val, info->type, feat);
 }
 
 static int write_psr_msr(unsigned int socket, unsigned int cos,
-                         uint32_t val, enum psr_feat_type feat_type)
+                         uint32_t val, enum cbm_type type,
+                         enum psr_feat_type feat_type)
 {
     struct psr_socket_info *info = get_socket_info(socket);
     struct cos_write_info data =
@@ -1017,6 +1099,7 @@ static int write_psr_msr(unsigned int socket, unsigned int cos,
         .cos = cos,
         .feature = info->features[feat_type],
         .val = val,
+        .type = type,
     };
 
     if ( socket == cpu_to_socket(smp_processor_id()) )
@@ -1033,6 +1116,40 @@ static int write_psr_msr(unsigned int socket, unsigned int cos,
     return 0;
 }
 
+static void restore_default_val(unsigned int socket, unsigned int cos,
+                                enum psr_feat_type feat_type)
+{
+    unsigned int i, j;
+    uint32_t default_val;
+    const struct psr_socket_info *info = get_socket_info(socket);
+
+    for ( i = 0; i < PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT; i++ )
+    {
+        const struct feat_node *feat = info->features[i];
+        /*
+         * There are four judgements:
+         * 1. Input 'feat_type' is valid so we have to get feature according to
+         *    it. If current feature type (i) does not match 'feat_type', we
+         *    need skip it, so continue to check next feature.
+         * 2. Input 'feat_type' is 'PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT' which means we should
+         *    handle all features in this case. So, go to next loop.
+         * 3. Do not need restore the COS value back to default if cos_num is 1,
+         *    e.g. L3 CAT. Because next value setting will overwrite it.
+         * 4. 'feat' we got is NULL, continue.
+         */
+        if ( ( feat_type != PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT && feat_type != i ) ||
+             !feat || feat->props->cos_num == 1 )
+            continue;
+
+        for ( j = 0; j < feat->props->cos_num; j++ )
+        {
+            feat->props->get_val(feat, 0, feat->props->type[j], &default_val);
+            write_psr_msr(socket, cos, default_val,
+                          feat->props->type[j], i);
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 /* The whole set process is protected by domctl_lock. */
 int psr_set_val(struct domain *d, unsigned int socket,
                 uint32_t val, enum cbm_type type)
@@ -1125,7 +1242,7 @@ int psr_set_val(struct domain *d, unsigned int socket,
          * Step 4:
          * Write all features MSRs according to the COS ID.
          */
-        ret = write_psr_msr(socket, cos, val, feat_type);
+        ret = write_psr_msr(socket, cos, val, type, feat_type);
         if ( ret )
             goto unlock_free_array;
     }
@@ -1139,10 +1256,26 @@ int psr_set_val(struct domain *d, unsigned int socket,
     ASSERT(!cos || ref[cos]);
     ASSERT(!old_cos || ref[old_cos]);
     ref[old_cos]--;
-    spin_unlock(&info->ref_lock);
 
     /*
      * Step 6:
+     * For features,  e.g. CDP, which cos_num is more than 1, we have to
+     * restore the old_cos value back to default when ref[old_cos] is 0.
+     * Otherwise, user will see wrong values when this COS ID is reused. E.g.
+     * user wants to set DATA to 0x3ff for a new domain. He hopes to see the
+     * DATA is set to 0x3ff and CODE should be the default value, 0x7ff. But
+     * if the COS ID picked for this action is the one that has been used by
+     * other domain and the CODE has been set to 0x1ff. Then, user will see
+     * DATA: 0x3ff, CODE: 0x1ff. So, we have to restore COS values for features
+     * using multiple COSs.
+     */
+    if ( old_cos && !ref[old_cos] )
+        restore_default_val(socket, old_cos, feat_type);
+
+    spin_unlock(&info->ref_lock);
+
+    /*
+     * Step 7:
      * Save the COS ID into current domain's psr_cos_ids[] so that we can know
      * which COS the domain is using on the socket. One domain can only use
      * one COS ID at same time on each socket.
@@ -1183,6 +1316,13 @@ static void psr_free_cos(struct domain *d)
         spin_lock(&info->ref_lock);
         ASSERT(!cos || info->cos_ref[cos]);
         info->cos_ref[cos]--;
+        /*
+         * The 'cos_ref[cos]' of 'd' is 0 now so we need restore corresponding
+         * COS registers to default value. Because this case happens when a
+         * domain is destroied, we need restore all features.
+         */
+        if ( !info->cos_ref[cos] )
+            restore_default_val(socket, cos, PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT);
         spin_unlock(&info->ref_lock);
     }
 
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-01 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-01 13:53 [PATCH v10 00/25] Enable L2 Cache Allocation Technology & Refactor psr.c Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 01/25] docs: create Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) and Code and Data Prioritization (CDP) feature document Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 02/25] x86: refactor psr: remove L3 CAT/CDP codes Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 03/25] x86: refactor psr: implement main data structures Yi Sun
2017-04-03 15:50   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05  3:12     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-05  8:20       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05  8:45         ` Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 04/25] x86: move cpuid_count_leaf from cpuid.c to processor.h Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 05/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2017-04-05 15:10   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-06  5:49     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-06  8:32       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-06  9:22         ` Yi Sun
2017-04-06  9:34           ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-06 10:02             ` Yi Sun
2017-04-06 14:02               ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-07  5:17                 ` Yi Sun
2017-04-07  8:48                   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-07  9:08                     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-07  9:46                       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-10  3:27                         ` Yi Sun
2017-04-10 12:43                           ` Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 06/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement Domain init/free and schedule flows Yi Sun
2017-04-05 15:23   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-06  6:01     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-06  8:34       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 07/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-04-05 15:37   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-06  6:05     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-06  8:36       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-06 11:16         ` Yi Sun
2017-04-06 14:04           ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-07  5:39             ` Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 08/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-04-05 15:51   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-06  6:10     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-06  8:40       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-06 11:13         ` Yi Sun
2017-04-06 14:08           ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-07  5:40             ` Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 09/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement framework Yi Sun
2017-04-11 15:01   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-12  5:53     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-12  9:09       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-12 12:23         ` Yi Sun
2017-04-12 12:42           ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-13  8:11             ` Yi Sun
2017-04-13  9:41               ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-13 10:49                 ` Yi Sun
2017-04-13 10:58                   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-13 11:11                     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-13 11:26                       ` Yi Sun
2017-04-13 11:31                       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-13 11:44                         ` Yi Sun
2017-04-13 11:50                           ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-18 10:55                             ` Yi Sun
2017-04-18 11:46                               ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-19  8:22                                 ` Yi Sun
2017-04-19  9:00                                   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-20  2:14                                     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-20  9:43                                       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-20 13:02                                         ` Lars Kurth
2017-04-20 13:21                                           ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-20 16:52                                             ` Lars Kurth
2017-04-21  6:11                                               ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-21  1:13                                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-04-21  6:18                                       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-24  6:40                                         ` Yi Sun
2017-04-24  6:55                                           ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-25  7:15                                             ` Yi Sun
2017-04-25  8:24                                               ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-25  8:40                                                 ` Yi Sun
2017-04-20  5:38   ` [PATCH] dom_ids array implementation Yi Sun
2017-04-26 10:04     ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-27  2:38       ` Yi Sun
2017-04-27  6:48         ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-27  9:30           ` Yi Sun
2017-04-27  9:39             ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-27 12:03               ` Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 10/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: assemble features value array Yi Sun
2017-04-11 15:11   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-12  5:55     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-12  9:13       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-12 12:26         ` Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 11/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos finding flow Yi Sun
2017-04-11 15:17   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 12/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos id picking flow Yi Sun
2017-04-11 15:20   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 13/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement write msr flow Yi Sun
2017-04-11 15:25   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-12  6:04     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 14/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 15/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 16/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-04-11 15:39   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-12  6:05     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-12  9:14       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-01 13:53 ` Yi Sun [this message]
2017-04-11 16:03   ` [PATCH v10 17/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement set value callback functions Jan Beulich
2017-04-12  6:14     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 18/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2017-04-12 15:18   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-13  8:12     ` Yi Sun
2017-04-13  8:16       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 19/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 20/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 21/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement set " Yi Sun
2017-04-12 15:23   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 22/25] tools: L2 CAT: support get HW info for L2 CAT Yi Sun
2017-04-12 15:24   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 23/25] tools: L2 CAT: support show cbm " Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 24/25] tools: L2 CAT: support set " Yi Sun
2017-04-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v10 25/25] docs: add L2 CAT description in docs Yi Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1491054836-30488-18-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=he.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.