From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751910AbdDCFS2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 01:18:28 -0400 Received: from LGEAMRELO13.lge.com ([156.147.23.53]:35610 "EHLO lgeamrelo13.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751141AbdDCFRm (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 01:17:42 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.151 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org X-Original-SENDERIP: 165.244.249.23 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.223.161 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org From: Minchan Kim To: Andrew Morton CC: , Sergey Senozhatsky , , Minchan Kim Subject: [PATCH 3/5] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:17:31 +0900 Message-ID: <1491196653-7388-4-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1491196653-7388-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> References: <1491196653-7388-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on LGEKRMHUB07/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2017/04/03 14:17:38, Serialize by Router on LGEKRMHUB07/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2017/04/03 14:17:38, Serialize complete at 2017/04/03 14:17:38 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org With this clean-up phase, I want to use zram's wrapper function to lock table access which is more consistent with other zram's functions. Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim --- drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c index 7938f4b98b01..71b0a584bc85 100644 --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c @@ -415,24 +415,39 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(io_stat); static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(mm_stat); static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(debug_stat); + +static void zram_slot_lock(struct zram *zram, u32 index) +{ + struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta; + + bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); +} + +static void zram_slot_unlock(struct zram *zram, u32 index) +{ + struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta; + + bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); +} + static bool zram_special_page_read(struct zram *zram, u32 index, struct page *page, unsigned int offset, unsigned int len) { struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta; - bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_lock(zram, index); if (unlikely(!meta->table[index].handle) || zram_test_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_SAME)) { void *mem; - bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_unlock(zram, index); mem = kmap_atomic(page); zram_fill_page(mem + offset, len, meta->table[index].element); kunmap_atomic(mem); return true; } - bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_unlock(zram, index); return false; } @@ -448,11 +463,11 @@ static bool zram_special_page_write(struct zram *zram, u32 index, kunmap_atomic(mem); /* Free memory associated with this sector now. */ - bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_lock(zram, index); zram_free_page(zram, index); zram_set_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_SAME); zram_set_element(meta, index, element); - bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_unlock(zram, index); atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.same_pages); return true; @@ -559,7 +574,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index) if (zram_special_page_read(zram, index, page, 0, PAGE_SIZE)) return 0; - bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_lock(zram, index); handle = meta->table[index].handle; size = zram_get_obj_size(meta, index); @@ -578,7 +593,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index) zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp); } zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, handle); - bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_unlock(zram, index); /* Should NEVER happen. Return bio error if it does. */ if (unlikely(ret)) @@ -731,11 +746,11 @@ static int __zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, * Free memory associated with this sector * before overwriting unused sectors. */ - bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_lock(zram, index); zram_free_page(zram, index); meta->table[index].handle = handle; zram_set_obj_size(meta, index, comp_len); - bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_unlock(zram, index); /* Update stats */ atomic64_add(comp_len, &zram->stats.compr_data_size); @@ -793,7 +808,6 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, u32 index, int offset, struct bio *bio) { size_t n = bio->bi_iter.bi_size; - struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta; /* * zram manages data in physical block size units. Because logical block @@ -814,9 +828,9 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, u32 index, } while (n >= PAGE_SIZE) { - bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_lock(zram, index); zram_free_page(zram, index); - bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_unlock(zram, index); atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free); index++; n -= PAGE_SIZE; @@ -925,9 +939,9 @@ static void zram_slot_free_notify(struct block_device *bdev, zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; meta = zram->meta; - bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_lock(zram, index); zram_free_page(zram, index); - bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + zram_slot_unlock(zram, index); atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free); } -- 2.7.4