From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: osstest-admin@xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [xen-4.6-testing bisection] complete test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 19:23:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491326625.18721.3.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58E21DBB020000780014BE92@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1308 bytes --]
On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 02:02 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 03.04.17 at 00:44, <osstest-admin@xenproject.org> wrote:
> > commit 7ff6d9fc19ef88d2ca3304a312c0e8a46b61f546
> > Author: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> > Date: Fri Mar 31 09:03:32 2017 +0200
> >
> > xen: sched: don't call hooks of the wrong scheduler via
> > VCPU2OP
>
> I must have completely screwed up on this backport, so I've simply
> reverted it for now. I didn't look closely yet whether this is some
> trivial oversight of mine, or whether perhaps it shouldn't have been
> backported that far back in the first place.
>
I had a look. The backport looks fine in itself to me.
If I'm not mistaken, this is not in staging-4.6:
f3d47501db2b7bb8dfd6a3c9710b7aff4b1fc55b
xen: fix a (latent) cpupool-related race during domain destroy
I can't be positive this is what's missing, but it's my best guess. :-)
I also haven't tried backporting it, but I'm happy to. Let me know if I
should.
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-04 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-02 22:44 [xen-4.6-testing bisection] complete test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 osstest service owner
2017-04-03 8:02 ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-04 17:23 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2017-04-05 6:54 ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05 16:53 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491326625.18721.3.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.