All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	songliubraving@fb.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com
Cc: jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, axboe@fb.com, hare@suse.de, hch@lst.de,
	gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: ses: don't get power status of SES device slot on probe
Date: Wed,  5 Apr 2017 12:18:19 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491405499-5429-1-git-send-email-mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

The commit 08024885a2a3 ("ses: Add power_status to SES device slot")
introduced the 'power_status' attribute to enclosure components and
the associated callbacks.

There are 2 callbacks available to get the power status of a device:
1) ses_get_power_status() for 'struct enclosure_component_callbacks'
2) get_component_power_status() for the sysfs device attribute
(these are available for kernel-space and user-space, respectively.)

However, despite both methods being available to get power status
on demand, that commit also introduced a call to get power status
in ses_enclosure_data_process().

This dramatically increased the total probe time for SCSI devices
on larger configurations, because ses_enclosure_data_process() is
called several times during the SCSI devices probe and loops over
the component devices (but that is another problem, another patch).

That results in a tremendous continuous hammering of SCSI Receive
Diagnostics commands to the enclosure-services device, which does
delay the total probe time for the SCSI devices __significantly__:

  Originally, ~34 minutes on a system attached to ~170 disks:

    [ 9214.490703] mpt3sas version 13.100.00.00 loaded
    ...
    [11256.580231] scsi 17:0:177:0: qdepth(16), tagged(1), simple(0),
                   ordered(0), scsi_level(6), cmd_que(1)

  With this patch, it decreased to ~2.5 minutes -- a 13.6x faster

    [ 1002.992533] mpt3sas version 13.100.00.00 loaded
    ...
    [ 1151.978831] scsi 11:0:177:0: qdepth(16), tagged(1), simple(0),
                   ordered(0), scsi_level(6), cmd_que(1)

Back to the commit discussion.. on the ses_get_power_status() call
introduced in ses_enclosure_data_process(): impact of removing it.

That may possibly be in place to initialize the power status value
on device probe.  However, those 2 functions available to retrieve
that value _do_ automatically refresh/update it.  So the potential
benefit would be a direct access of the 'power_status' field which
does not use the callbacks...

But the only reader of 'struct enclosure_component::power_status'
is the get_component_power_status() callback for sysfs attribute,
and it _does_ check for and call the .get_power_status callback,
(which indeed is defined and implemented by that commit), so the
power status value is, again, automatically updated.

So, the remaining potential for a direct/non-callback access to
the power_status attribute would be out-of-tree modules -- well,
for those, if they are for whatever reason interested in values
that are set during device probe and not up-to-date by the time
they need it.. well, that would be curious.

Well, to handle that more properly, set the initial power state
value to '-1' (i.e., uninitialized) instead of '1' (power 'on'),
and check for it in that callback which may do an direct access
to the field value _if_ a callback function is not defined.

Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes: 08024885a2a3 ("ses: Add power_status to SES device slot")
---

v2:
 - remove module parameter.
 - better return values for -1/uninitalized power_status.
   (thanks: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>)

 drivers/misc/enclosure.c | 7 ++++++-
 drivers/scsi/ses.c       | 1 -
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/enclosure.c b/drivers/misc/enclosure.c
index 65fed7146e9b..d3fe3ea902d4 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/enclosure.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/enclosure.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct enclosure_device *
 	for (i = 0; i < components; i++) {
 		edev->component[i].number = -1;
 		edev->component[i].slot = -1;
-		edev->component[i].power_status = 1;
+		edev->component[i].power_status = -1;
 	}
 
 	mutex_lock(&container_list_lock);
@@ -594,6 +594,11 @@ static ssize_t get_component_power_status(struct device *cdev,
 
 	if (edev->cb->get_power_status)
 		edev->cb->get_power_status(edev, ecomp);
+
+	/* If still uninitialized, the callback failed or does not exist. */
+	if (ecomp->power_status == -1)
+		return (edev->cb->get_power_status) ? -EIO : -ENOTTY;
+
 	return snprintf(buf, 40, "%s\n", ecomp->power_status ? "on" : "off");
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ses.c b/drivers/scsi/ses.c
index 50adabbb5808..f1cdf32d7514 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ses.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ses.c
@@ -548,7 +548,6 @@ static void ses_enclosure_data_process(struct enclosure_device *edev,
 					ecomp = &edev->component[components++];
 
 				if (!IS_ERR(ecomp)) {
-					ses_get_power_status(edev, ecomp);
 					if (addl_desc_ptr)
 						ses_process_descriptor(
 							ecomp,
-- 
1.8.3.1

             reply	other threads:[~2017-04-05 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-05 15:18 Mauricio Faria de Oliveira [this message]
2017-04-05 15:32 ` [PATCH v2] scsi: ses: don't get power status of SES device slot on probe Dan Williams
2017-04-05 16:23 ` Song Liu
2017-04-05 17:22   ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2017-04-06 16:49 ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1491405499-5429-1-git-send-email-mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.