From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f49.google.com (mail-it0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E20477D6F for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a140so38251243ita.0 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 23:37:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9nknJfLRmsvqL3Tw7Hk3DTqNyX50WKintkvMHHC7D2E=; b=HsS6iBgWel7NX/jaW80JVbCGzcbPmqYawTb6WjoqPGyRDj4ito0HDtMj5FTLovEtH9 GVvRxy0nGUGFk/aWNm29g/qiQ9z7VzDGmT0MDlDUVe+VxsUtAAR08ZUr2BeHDtyrgDOc Jl6VN8f9pdlGJGnYuz+NU0bcVs7bCczR4UyfCM1Bf0DJ0goRbzj8Y3BDa4qwpB9t6Pfl 1AfgI/02l+1Ea+OivRv1DJX//nRhXhHjoKxY4YDDfxE8LQKx5f3kKVgZDGJ8U5s5oyTN 2VBvxy9O8eJwY8CJqDiOauZyCWWUW/aBUjhQ6WRbrZMAVDoZgXWefUSpwVRXAL57psHV 7I1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9nknJfLRmsvqL3Tw7Hk3DTqNyX50WKintkvMHHC7D2E=; b=S7MthSazsp4PL+hpNeGJz4tW4PhojGJgNY77iKgslrnCrwLk5ADWDS93WmCDKRCBRx lMSbssC2JFOWTvLPmW3Ss8/MsHdAd5RTlpjyp5/A6AqTuvtUWYR1r6f1HpS+NptO6s75 h+TOs+gLMce2HuMdiYJBKJlYS2ouojq1/uRoBagZu54hM1HdHDX/eDiDxZZlVOSUDRp0 ffoB9s7PGnoB7E0HQUzFcPfBJu1m5OPRoGNLoqIFzPGPhvDTA82PAuBCBRcON7jJysXC q99siSJ5diTBLSMlD7v+KrVGCTT3nr5jUnNDQFx0dHnptVbRjCMH87QqmU1/T3WH3HhU T3/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3NVmb+QFvXnJ5PBQeUdLSkfFbMLiHeRhzCHbaqekkfpx2i+BTp Che0AW2iXTcDAbr4 X-Received: by 10.36.29.83 with SMTP id 80mr30929103itj.2.1491547073296; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 23:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8EAD9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.234.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u124sm1079931ita.27.2017.04.06.23.37.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Apr 2017 23:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1491547069.10884.55.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Paul Eggleton Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:37:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9a743ad396af642fc20961e38fb7f6c5752f2446.1491514854.git.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> References: <9a743ad396af642fc20961e38fb7f6c5752f2446.1491514854.git.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] lib/bb/siggen: add collapsed mode to compare_sigfiles() X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 06:37:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 09:52 +1200, Paul Eggleton wrote: > If we just want to drill down to the actual differences then we don't > need to see certain things in the output, e.g. basehash changing or the > signature of dependent tasks. This will be used for comparing signatures > within buildhistory-diff in OE-Core; the default mode as used by > bitbake-diffsigs and bitbake -S printdiff remains unchanged for the > moment. This sounds interesting. The bitbake-diffsigs output I got for the yocto-compat-layer had such useless "basehash changed" comments. Should we add a mode parameter to bitbake-diffsigs that allows choosing this collapsed mode? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.