From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibmvscsis: Do not send aborted task response Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 16:36:49 +0000 Message-ID: <1491583008.2559.12.camel@sandisk.com> References: <1491580154-30489-1-git-send-email-bryantly@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0c80c6e3-168a-d8bd-d7b4-e727723bcf18@sandisk.com> <5297a130-5349-1796-2fe4-2336daa346ab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from esa1.hgst.iphmx.com ([68.232.141.245]:1414 "EHLO esa1.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934248AbdDGQgy (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2017 12:36:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5297a130-5349-1796-2fe4-2336daa346ab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "bryantly@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "nab@linux-iscsi.org" Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "target-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "seroyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com" On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 11:12 -0500, Bryant G. Ly wrote: > So from this stack trace it looks like the ibmvscsis driver is sending an > extra response through send_messages even though an abort was issued. =20 > IBMi, reported this issue internally when they were testing the driver, > because their client didn't like getting a response back for the aborted = op. > They are only expecting a TMR from the abort request, NOT the aborted op.= =20 Hello Bryant, What is the root cause of this behavior? Why is it that the behavior of the ibmvscsi_tgt contradicts what has been implemented in the LIO core? Sorry but the patch at the start of this thread looks to me like an attempt to paper over the problem instead of addressing the root cause. Thanks, Bart.=