From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751388AbdDHFXQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Apr 2017 01:23:16 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:65151 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750725AbdDHFXH (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Apr 2017 01:23:07 -0400 Message-ID: <1491628927.4479.25.camel@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 13/13] futex: futex_lock_pi() vs PREEMPT_RT_FULL From: Mike Galbraith To: Darren Hart , Peter Zijlstra Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, xlpang@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2017 07:22:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170408022610.GC16143@fury> References: <20170322103547.756091212@infradead.org> <20170322104152.161341537@infradead.org> <20170408022610.GC16143@fury> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vZH1z2cxNMFDhg+32mJxEikryb7dCBf8Peae0ME7/vpSe8LlyKg Iz9C06TIEksGprdDggiCk2O/SnxdWL8fXm0K5KjO4eKIw+ag1aE9RJoKyPdpSbyxZDz2nxH YLL2lYkiuH4ziNw82cZN6meIbFGWWiJWVLNQJ9e6TqMUrBUSlXB+KHFliUZdVfMiriNkLUk ygqj8LLphhEalayZK4rOQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:J+oteXm3m8Y=:lJu67yc6tRzVphy8YBIrQe TGcl/OH6wn8CK67tKxuswvqivUbpUKqBtLRB7V4a2b2vGZjd1UzFO2OUtFN/cuznXaiGqSF0e PTpBLJADPjFsJ2oBX+kn2k9XdxUjojOg99Y4flnADzt1AWTAiO7+600G3GdyoHh4UIXi1psAG ly0vAhiYkdZqE24sV2CiToVhpKTWUQf0kS1UNq4oSYYsN8AnVXPzpv9Oob0WfZadjBRJNS/2w H00cVFVOT67Nc1yBVx45Gg/bH+JZFWkjwgZJbAUeQnfnkB/QI/y7Q2Xjc2Nk8J6SvE/3bonAW hXwzTTsOzB2JiWzoKQOIZoqtNHFnc0mHJyP0rQhwupgn6CMKxIcMdvCQoXIZPZZc/gdy1481c yacqbDG0rGZN1zqaZnEko0lnGPC6QJWbT+S8LPtTuUNXufKKO2tR518opcJ3Xvwk83UHHqFgH QyXu/quuCN39mdDcLYQhN28yCeRQVPRbg4F40jGaDky52LvzRP9Z19i4yeykE02P30P4wOaLB oEHvbiRUXqQYDm2MaJC9o4Ujo2Bx0rslTz6W385PywLhLzF+09ta6nogttJo0AtgON5s30Nax YW4jVPhBONzTZJD4L+ZDoHLYU5Bc1Xc630Z0SEJGhfhle7lErTNgLhc0XqMjFgu+GOPXA+AcJ zYXMifii+hrq+AeXpSsqpnUJNhfcS/KCdSS93GqE71x9Wxm+f9cUuTjV1TvrPIJvYYkx9bGK/ OyD9f2qnt2mRM/YfqiNw5oz55uw8Gc2mp2VO9po0M5nNbLRONiuOLyPIUCuASZPUjWrTdM9iJ 4rE8vpB Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 19:26 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > I would like to see more testing because... well... futexes. But, we don't have > a futex torture suite yet, but that is something I'm hoping to be looking into > in the near future. What testing we do have available has passed between my > futex selftests, the LTP suite, the pi_stress, and the RT runs by Sebastian. Ditto, tip-rt shows no signs of trouble.