All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "osandov@osandov.com" <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: "hare@suse.com" <hare@suse.com>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"osandov@fb.com" <osandov@fb.com>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] blk-mq: Do not invoke queue operations on a dead queue
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 23:05:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492124731.2723.1.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170413230102.GA1550@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com>

On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 16:01 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 01:58:37PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > The blk-mq debugfs attributes are removed after blk_cleanup_queue()
> > has finished. Since running a queue after a queue has entered the
> > "dead" state is not allowed, disallow this. This patch avoids that
> > an attempt to run a dead queue triggers a kernel crash.
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
> > Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-mq-debugfs.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >=20
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> > index df9b688b877c..a1ce823578c7 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> > @@ -111,6 +111,14 @@ static ssize_t blk_queue_flags_store(struct file *=
file, const char __user *ubuf,
> >  	struct request_queue *q =3D file_inode(file)->i_private;
> >  	char op[16] =3D { }, *s;
> > =20
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The debugfs attributes are removed after blk_cleanup_queue() has
> > +	 * called blk_mq_free_queue(). Return if QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD has been set
> > +	 * to avoid triggering a use-after-free.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (blk_queue_dead(q))
> > +		return -ENOENT;
> > +
> >  	len =3D min(len, sizeof(op) - 1);
> >  	if (copy_from_user(op, ubuf, len))
> >  		return -EFAULT;
>=20
> Looking at this, I think we have similar issues with most of the other
> debugfs files. Should we move the debugfs cleanup earlier?

Hello Omar,

That's a good question. However, while I was debugging it was very convenie=
nt
to be able to access the queue state after it had reached the "dead" state.
Performing the cleanup earlier would be an alternative solution but would
make debugging a bit harder ...

Bart.=

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-13 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-11 20:58 [PATCH 0/6] blk-mq debugfs patches for kernel v4.12 Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 20:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-mq: Do not invoke queue operations on a dead queue Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 23:01   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-04-13 23:03     ` Omar Sandoval
2017-04-13 23:05     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-04-14  7:40       ` Omar Sandoval
2017-04-14 16:12         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-14 17:13           ` Omar Sandoval
2017-04-14 17:37             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 20:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: Move the "state" debugfs attribute one level down Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 23:01   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-04-11 20:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-mq: Make blk_flags_show() callers append a newline character Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 23:08   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-04-11 20:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-mq: Show operation, cmd_flags and rq_flags names Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 23:17   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-04-11 20:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-mq: Add blk_mq_ops.show_rq() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 23:21   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-04-14 16:03     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 20:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] scsi: Implement blk_mq_ops.show_rq() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 20:58   ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1492124731.2723.1.camel@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.