All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, hubiaoyong <hubiaoyong@gmail.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hby2003@163.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator/core.c: remove the else statement
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:28:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492532921.8661.42.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170418154947.tuom2jg5hwcpzje2@sirena.org.uk>

On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 16:49 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:39:34PM +0800, hubiaoyong wrote:
> > in the function regulator_ena_gpio_free, the if branch contains
> > the return statement, so remove the else statement.
> 
> Why is it a benefit to make this change?

In general, reducing source code indentation is a good thing.

The logic today is:

	/* Free the GPIO only in case of no use */
	list_for_each_entry_safe(pin, n, &regulator_ena_gpio_list, list) {
		if (pin->gpiod == rdev->ena_pin->gpiod) {
			if (pin->request_count <= 1) {
				pin->request_count = 0;
				gpiod_put(pin->gpiod);
				list_del(&pin->list);
				kfree(pin);
				rdev->ena_pin = NULL;
				return;
			} else {
				pin->request_count--;
			}
		}
	}

Perhaps it's better written as:

	/* Free the GPIO only in case of no use */
	list_for_each_entry_safe(pin, n, &regulator_ena_gpio_list, list) {
		if (pin->gpiod != rdev->ena_pin->gpiod)
			continue;
		if (pin->request_count <= 1) {
			pin->request_count = 0;
			gpiod_put(pin->gpiod);
			list_del(&pin->list);
			kfree(pin);
			rdev->ena_pin = NULL;
			return;
		}
		pin->request_count--;
	}

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-18 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-18 15:39 [PATCH] regulator/core.c: remove the else statement hubiaoyong
2017-04-18 15:49 ` Mark Brown
2017-04-18 16:28   ` Joe Perches [this message]
     [not found]     ` <CAJPOojYT0Mk-+_Enmtz6C1ZRGDmMcnQLMAOXvGwKAs+bM67tMg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-04-19 16:26       ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1492532921.8661.42.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=hby2003@163.com \
    --cc=hubiaoyong@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.