From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751443AbdEBSsu (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2017 14:48:50 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:38033 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750770AbdEBSsr (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2017 14:48:47 -0400 From: Mimi Zohar To: linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Mimi Zohar , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , Dave Young Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ima: define a set of appraisal rules requiring file signatures Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 14:47:10 -0400 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1493750832-11981-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1493750832-11981-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-MML: disable x-cbid: 17050218-0004-0000-0000-000001FD5C75 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17050218-0005-0000-0000-000009F2368D Message-Id: <1493750832-11981-3-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-05-02_13:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1705020097 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The builtin "ima_appraise_tcb" policy should require file signatures for at least a few of the hooks (eg. kernel modules, firmware, and the kexec kernel image), but changing it would break the existing userspace/kernel ABI. This patch defines a new builtin policy named "secure_boot", which can be specified on the "ima_policy=" boot command line, independently or in conjunction with the "ima_appraise_tcb" policy, by specifing ima_policy="appraise_tcb | secure_boot". The new appraisal rules requiring file signatures will be added prior to the "ima_appraise_tcb" rules. Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar Changelog: - Reference secure boot in the new builtin policy name. (Thiago Bauermann) --- Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 +++++- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt index 06b95e28e5e2..4e15b6a67d2c 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ ima_policy= [IMA] The builtin policies to load during IMA setup. - Format: "tcb | appraise_tcb" + Format: "tcb | appraise_tcb | secure_boot" The "tcb" policy measures all programs exec'd, files mmap'd for exec, and all files opened with the read @@ -1489,6 +1489,10 @@ all files owned by root. (This is the equivalent of ima_appraise_tcb.) + The "secure_boot" policy appraises the integrity + of files (eg. kexec kernel image, kernel modules, + firmware, policy, etc) based on file signatures. + ima_tcb [IMA] Deprecated. Use ima_policy= instead. Load a policy which meets the needs of the Trusted Computing Base. This means IMA will measure all diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 0ddc41389a9c..3653c86c70df 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -153,6 +153,17 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = { #endif }; +static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = { + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = MODULE_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = FIRMWARE_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = POLICY_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, +}; + static LIST_HEAD(ima_default_rules); static LIST_HEAD(ima_policy_rules); static LIST_HEAD(ima_temp_rules); @@ -171,6 +182,7 @@ static int __init default_measure_policy_setup(char *str) __setup("ima_tcb", default_measure_policy_setup); static bool ima_use_appraise_tcb __initdata; +static bool ima_use_secure_boot __initdata; static int __init policy_setup(char *str) { char *p; @@ -182,6 +194,8 @@ static int __init policy_setup(char *str) ima_policy = DEFAULT_TCB; else if (strcmp(p, "appraise_tcb") == 0) ima_use_appraise_tcb = 1; + else if (strcmp(p, "secure_boot") == 0) + ima_use_secure_boot = 1; } return 1; @@ -410,12 +424,14 @@ void ima_update_policy_flag(void) */ void __init ima_init_policy(void) { - int i, measure_entries, appraise_entries; + int i, measure_entries, appraise_entries, secure_boot_entries; /* if !ima_policy set entries = 0 so we load NO default rules */ measure_entries = ima_policy ? ARRAY_SIZE(dont_measure_rules) : 0; appraise_entries = ima_use_appraise_tcb ? ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules) : 0; + secure_boot_entries = ima_use_secure_boot ? + ARRAY_SIZE(secure_boot_rules) : 0; for (i = 0; i < measure_entries; i++) list_add_tail(&dont_measure_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules); @@ -434,6 +450,14 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) break; } + /* + * Insert the appraise rules requiring file signatures, prior to + * any other appraise rules. + */ + for (i = 0; i < secure_boot_entries; i++) + list_add_tail(&secure_boot_rules[i].list, + &ima_default_rules); + for (i = 0; i < appraise_entries; i++) { list_add_tail(&default_appraise_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules); -- 2.7.4 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar) Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 14:47:10 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ima: define a set of appraisal rules requiring file signatures In-Reply-To: <1493750832-11981-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1493750832-11981-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <1493750832-11981-3-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org The builtin "ima_appraise_tcb" policy should require file signatures for at least a few of the hooks (eg. kernel modules, firmware, and the kexec kernel image), but changing it would break the existing userspace/kernel ABI. This patch defines a new builtin policy named "secure_boot", which can be specified on the "ima_policy=" boot command line, independently or in conjunction with the "ima_appraise_tcb" policy, by specifing ima_policy="appraise_tcb | secure_boot". The new appraisal rules requiring file signatures will be added prior to the "ima_appraise_tcb" rules. Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar Changelog: - Reference secure boot in the new builtin policy name. (Thiago Bauermann) --- Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 +++++- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt index 06b95e28e5e2..4e15b6a67d2c 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ ima_policy= [IMA] The builtin policies to load during IMA setup. - Format: "tcb | appraise_tcb" + Format: "tcb | appraise_tcb | secure_boot" The "tcb" policy measures all programs exec'd, files mmap'd for exec, and all files opened with the read @@ -1489,6 +1489,10 @@ all files owned by root. (This is the equivalent of ima_appraise_tcb.) + The "secure_boot" policy appraises the integrity + of files (eg. kexec kernel image, kernel modules, + firmware, policy, etc) based on file signatures. + ima_tcb [IMA] Deprecated. Use ima_policy= instead. Load a policy which meets the needs of the Trusted Computing Base. This means IMA will measure all diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 0ddc41389a9c..3653c86c70df 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -153,6 +153,17 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = { #endif }; +static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = { + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = MODULE_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = FIRMWARE_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = POLICY_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, +}; + static LIST_HEAD(ima_default_rules); static LIST_HEAD(ima_policy_rules); static LIST_HEAD(ima_temp_rules); @@ -171,6 +182,7 @@ static int __init default_measure_policy_setup(char *str) __setup("ima_tcb", default_measure_policy_setup); static bool ima_use_appraise_tcb __initdata; +static bool ima_use_secure_boot __initdata; static int __init policy_setup(char *str) { char *p; @@ -182,6 +194,8 @@ static int __init policy_setup(char *str) ima_policy = DEFAULT_TCB; else if (strcmp(p, "appraise_tcb") == 0) ima_use_appraise_tcb = 1; + else if (strcmp(p, "secure_boot") == 0) + ima_use_secure_boot = 1; } return 1; @@ -410,12 +424,14 @@ void ima_update_policy_flag(void) */ void __init ima_init_policy(void) { - int i, measure_entries, appraise_entries; + int i, measure_entries, appraise_entries, secure_boot_entries; /* if !ima_policy set entries = 0 so we load NO default rules */ measure_entries = ima_policy ? ARRAY_SIZE(dont_measure_rules) : 0; appraise_entries = ima_use_appraise_tcb ? ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules) : 0; + secure_boot_entries = ima_use_secure_boot ? + ARRAY_SIZE(secure_boot_rules) : 0; for (i = 0; i < measure_entries; i++) list_add_tail(&dont_measure_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules); @@ -434,6 +450,14 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) break; } + /* + * Insert the appraise rules requiring file signatures, prior to + * any other appraise rules. + */ + for (i = 0; i < secure_boot_entries; i++) + list_add_tail(&secure_boot_rules[i].list, + &ima_default_rules); + for (i = 0; i < appraise_entries; i++) { list_add_tail(&default_appraise_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules); -- 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info@ http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html